"Max Pyziur" wrote:
I've put in a test ip address in /etc/hosts.deny like so:
dovecot: 166.84.1.2
Maybe
imap: 166.84.1.2
imaps: 166.84.1.2
pop3: 166.84.1.2
pop3s: 166.84.1.2
Joseph Tam
Hi!
I wrote a little something about how to prevent delivery to mailboxes
over quota while still being in the SMTP dialogue:
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
(Postfix/Dovecot-2.2)
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 Mü
On 04/11/2013 10:39 PM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
> How to lock dovecot-uidlist file before reading by an external program?
> [perl script]
I have been too "sending happy".
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir
The dovecot-uidlist file doesn't need to be locked for reading.
How to lock dovecot-uidlist file before reading by an external program?
[perl script]
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, lists-dovecot wrote:
[... snip ...]
I've put in a test ip address in /etc/hosts.deny like so:
dovecot: 166.84.1.2
And then I execute the following from 166.84.1.2 to port 110:
bash-3.2$ telnet SiteWhereImConfiguringDovecot 110
Trying SiteWhereImConfiguringDovecot...
C
On 11.4.2013, at 15.31, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I'm curious and have questions about the new Object Storage Plugin (OSP), and
> how it can be leveraged by an SMB like us.
I'll give some more complete answers and examples and such within a few days..
Or probably better if I write down some scen
On 11.4.2013, at 18.29, Pigi wrote:
> Sorry for top posting, but I have no additional info on this.
> BTW I need to refresh the question as I have tried squat, and I'm biting the
> dust with the already known problems
> ( "Corrupted squat uidlist file" or "Panic: file squat-trie.c:" ).
>
> Is
> On 5.4.2013, at 18.19, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>> So my question relates to the second part of the configuration examples
>> in the links above:
>>
>> service tcpwrap {
>> unix_listener login/tcpwrap {
>>group = $default_login_user
>>mode = 0600
>>user = $default_login_user
>> }
>> }
>
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 15:41 +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:57:45PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > Perhaps [MASTER_AUTH_MAX_DATA_SIZE] could be configurable?
>
> I tried to add a configuration option for that, but dovecot design
> makes a good job at separating mast
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:57:45PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Perhaps [MASTER_AUTH_MAX_DATA_SIZE] could be configurable?
I tried to add a configuration option for that, but dovecot design
makes a good job at separating master and login structures, hence
The Right Way is not obvious. Anu sugg
Sorry for top posting, but I have no additional info on this.
BTW I need to refresh the question as I have tried squat, and I'm biting the
dust with the already known problems
( "Corrupted squat uidlist file" or "Panic: file squat-trie.c:" ).
Is there some pointer on where/how to find assist on
Am 11.04.2013 15:00, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
>> I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
>> user. I thought this would be possible by creating a global acl file (here
>> "global-acl") like:
>
> Sorry, t
On 2013-04-11 9:55 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Would the plugin support the ability to use two different storage
'namespaces', e.g., one for primary email storage (stored on S3's
'Standard' storage tier), and one for 'older or 'archived' emails
stored on the much cheaper 'Glacier' system/tier?
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:35:32 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.4.2013, at 16.24, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> >> The MTA can work as it used to, if it can just set a group-read permission
> >> to the files. So your read-only user would belong to that read-only-group.
> >> I'm not sure
On 2013-04-11 8:31 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Third - I'm a little confused by the Amazon S3 pricing page,
Specifically, the 'Request Pricing' shown here:
http://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/
Also...
Would the plugin support the ability to use two different storage
'namespaces', e.g., one for
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:22:50 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Those errors come from your script. I don't see anything in the quota
> warning change that could have changed a behavior in your script.
> Maybe your script changed also around the same time?
>
yeah, sorry. there was indeed a change at
On 11.4.2013, at 16.24, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>> The MTA can work as it used to, if it can just set a group-read permission
>> to the files. So your read-only user would belong to that read-only-group.
>> I'm not sure how Postfix assigns permissions, but if it can't do that you
>> cou
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:15:23 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.4.2013, at 16.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:00:22 +0300
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> >> On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >>
> >>> I try to configure dovecot to make al
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:00:22 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
> > user. I thought this would be possible by creating a global acl file (here
> > "global-acl") li
On 11.4.2013, at 16.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:00:22 +0300
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>>
>>> I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
>>> user. I thought this would be
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:08:31 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.04.2013 15:05, schrieb Stephan von Krawczynski:
> > Let me explain some more details, that seem important to understand:
> >
> > I cannot use acl files per folder/mailbox because the MTA creates folders
> > dynamically (re-ord
Am 11.04.2013 15:05, schrieb Stephan von Krawczynski:
> Let me explain some more details, that seem important to understand:
>
> I cannot use acl files per folder/mailbox because the MTA creates folders
> dynamically (re-orders mails in folders)
why does the MTA that?
normally the MTA should o
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:00:22 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
> > user. I thought this would be possible by creating a global acl file (here
> > "global-acl") li
Let me explain some more details, that seem important to understand:
I cannot use acl files per folder/mailbox because the MTA creates folders
dynamically (re-orders mails in folders). So I really would need some idea to
tell dovecot to let a certain user access his mailbox/folders read-only, no
m
On 11.4.2013, at 15.19, Dave Gattis wrote:
> Where can I find unaltered distribution config files (/etc/dovecot/ and
> /etc/dovecot/config.d/) for Dovecot 2.1.7? I upgraded from version 1 and had
> to butcher them to get it working. Now that I understand it better, I'd like
> to do it right.
On 11.4.2013, at 15.07, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
> user. I thought this would be possible by creating a global acl file (here
> "global-acl") like:
Sorry, there is still no "default ACLs" feature in Dovecot. The
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:54:01PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > This is for pam_saml. The webmail sends a signed SAML assertion as the
> > password, and the PAM module validates it.
> The pam_saml could easily be changed to use AUTHENTICATE PLAIN instead.
pam_saml is not the component that cho
Hi Timo,
I'm curious and have questions about the new Object Storage Plugin
(OSP), and how it can be leveraged by an SMB like us.
First, am I reading this right where it could be used as a kind of
'live/realtime backup' solution, where everything is stored *both*
locally and in the cloud, wi
Where can I find unaltered distribution config files (/etc/dovecot/ and
/etc/dovecot/config.d/) for Dovecot 2.1.7? I upgraded from version 1
and had to butcher them to get it working. Now that I understand it
better, I'd like to do it right.
--
Dave
On 2013-04-11 5:00 AM, HylkeB wrote:
I see now, took some time for me to sink in. Is there any way on the server
to disable the pop3 protocol, so all email users cant accidently use pop3
and delete all their old emails?
I suppose i would have to do something like the following on the server:
Hello all,
I try to configure dovecot to make all imap accesses read-only for a certain
user. I thought this would be possible by creating a global acl file (here
"global-acl") like:
user= lr
and
plugin {
acl = vfile:/etc/dovecot/global-acls:cache_secs=300
}
But that seems to be ignored. Wh
On 04/04/2013 03:56, Christian Balzer wrote:
2. Despite the fact that it will be trivial for anybody to determine that
OEM A is now hosted with us, a SAN SSL makes all the SANs visible in one
go, something they probably don't want.
But someone smart enough to be able to look at a certificate,
On 11.4.2013, at 14.58, m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
>> By this I think you don't mean special authentication mechanisms, or even
>> AUTHENTICATE PLAIN mechanism, but you mean that someone is using LOGIN
>> command in such a kludgy way that the password field is over 1024
>> bytes lon
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> By this I think you don't mean special authentication mechanisms, or even
> AUTHENTICATE PLAIN mechanism, but you mean that someone is using LOGIN
> command in such a kludgy way that the password field is over 1024
> bytes long?
This is for pam_saml. The webmail sends a s
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 08:28 +, Mark Zealey wrote:
> I ran into an issue yesterday (dovecot 2.0) whereby when we dsync messages
> from a local machine (sdbox) to a remote (Maildir) which have different
> pop3_uidl_formats configured, the uidl format is not preserved. There doesn't
> seem to
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 11:04 +0200, David Obando wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the answer.
> Do I understand you right that currently it's not possible to manage
> both system users and virtual users in a dovecot 2 and lmtp setup?
If you have only a single domain, set auth_username_format=%Ln and
co
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:09:18PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Which is probably a few seconds, so I don't see this as much of a problem.
Ok, thanks.
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
| Groupe Exploitation et Infrastructure
On 11.4.2013, at 13.07, Thomas Hummel wrote:
>> It doesn't matter if new connections arrive during the final dsync,
>> because they are using the new format already. dsync merges changes, it
>> doesn't destroy any changes.
>
> It doesn't destroy changes but the user may see an incorrect state fo
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:21:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Not if you kick the users out at the correct time:
>
> - dsync
> - switch user to new format
> - kick users
> - final dsync
>
> It doesn't matter if new connections arrive during the final dsync,
> because they are using the ne
On 11.4.2013, at 11.41, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Here are a few unintegrated patches, just tested against 2.2rc7:
>
> 1) NetBSD's getmntinfo uses struct statvfs while other BSD use struct statfs
> http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/patch-ak
>
> 2) NetBSD 5.x net_getunixcred() support. Build on N
On 11.4.2013, at 9.06, Oli Schacher wrote:
>> * Running dsync no longer triggers quota warnings.
>
> Not sure if you saw my last post about this change.. it works but
> now maillog always shows these empty error messages after executing the
> quota script:
>
> Apr 11 07:55:08 fumailsynctes
Hi,
thanks for the answer.
Do I understand you right that currently it's not possible to manage
both system users and virtual users in a dovecot 2 and lmtp setup?
You were talking about "adding a generic passdb/userdb {
auth_username_format } setting". Are there any plans to do so?
What are your
>> Well, receiving ALL mails again, might not be too handy, but 14 days
>> is a quite short time. So can i change the pop3 settings so old
>> emails are stored for e.g. 3 months instead of 14 days? And just
>> curious, where can i disable the configuration that pop3 deletes
>> received me
Hi
Here are a few unintegrated patches, just tested against 2.2rc7:
1) NetBSD's getmntinfo uses struct statvfs while other BSD use struct statfs
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/patch-ak
2) NetBSD 5.x net_getunixcred() support. Build on NetBSD, but not tested
(I am testing on NetBSD 6.0):
http:/
Hi there,
I ran into an issue yesterday (dovecot 2.0) whereby when we dsync messages from
a local machine (sdbox) to a remote (Maildir) which have different
pop3_uidl_formats configured, the uidl format is not preserved. There doesn't
seem to be any way to force this in the code, although I sus
45 matches
Mail list logo
