Re: [Dovecot] Please help to make decision

2013-03-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
> On 25/03/2013 18:47, Thierry de Montaudry wrote: >> This is just my experience, it might not be the best, but with the >> (limited) budget we had, we finally came up with a solutions that can >> handle the load and got us away from SAN systems which could never >> handle the IOs for mail access.

Re: [Dovecot] Please help to make decision

2013-03-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/28/2013 3:34 PM, Ed W wrote: > I believe a variation on that theme is also to "double" each machine > using DRBD so that machines are arranged in pairs. One can fail and the > other will take over the load. ie each pair of machines mirrors the > storage for the other. With this arrangement onl

Re: [Dovecot] 3 node setup without cluster filesystem

2013-03-28 Thread Kui Zhang
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Parthey < daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > Michael wrote: > > short version: Is there any 3 host (two MX and one frontend IMAP) that > > can use a shared (iSCSI) ext4 volume? > > No. iSCSI exports a block device from one host to another sin

Re: [Dovecot] 3 node setup without cluster filesystem

2013-03-28 Thread Daniel Parthey
Michael wrote: > short version: Is there any 3 host (two MX and one frontend IMAP) that > can use a shared (iSCSI) ext4 volume? No. iSCSI exports a block device from one host to another single host. > Long version: > I am running a very complex setup right now with two MX, two > proxies(lmtp/imap

[Dovecot] 3 node setup without cluster filesystem

2013-03-28 Thread Michael
Hi everyone, short version: Is there any 3 host (two MX and one frontend IMAP) that can use a shared (iSCSI) ext4 volume? Long version: I am running a very complex setup right now with two MX, two proxies(lmtp/imap)/imap-frontends and two backends mounting an ocfs2 volume. I would like to reduc

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 & LEMONADE extensions

2013-03-28 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 3/28/2013 11:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.3.2013, at 22.44, Ed W wrote: Also there's a good chance that Dovecot v2.3 will have an SMTP submission server with BURL support (that will simply forward the mail to a real SMTP server). A few weeks back I gave this a look and I made a func

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 & LEMONADE extensions

2013-03-28 Thread Ed W
On 28/03/2013 22:10, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.3.2013, at 22.44, Ed W wrote: My understanding is that you will need an SMTP server which supports such a feature. Apple patch Postfix to support this using the BURL extension, however, for whatever reason the patch has not been picked up by Po

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 & LEMONADE extensions

2013-03-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 28.3.2013, at 22.44, Ed W wrote: > My understanding is that you will need an SMTP server which supports such a > feature. Apple patch Postfix to support this using the BURL extension, > however, for whatever reason the patch has not been picked up by Postfix: > > http://www.opensource.apple

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 & LEMONADE extensions

2013-03-28 Thread Ed W
On 26/03/2013 13:39, Jan Phillip Greimann wrote: Hi there, I read an article about dovecot 2.2, which includes the LEMONADE extensions, and was fascinated about the feature "Forward without download". We have a small internet-uplink in our office and our CEO loves to receive mails with large

Re: [Dovecot] Please help to make decision

2013-03-28 Thread Ed W
I believe a variation on that theme is also to "double" each machine using DRBD so that machines are arranged in pairs. One can fail and the other will take over the load. ie each pair of machines mirrors the storage for the other. With this arrangement only warm failover is usually required an

[Dovecot] Virtual - thread refs for labeled message

2013-03-28 Thread Łukasz
Hi I hope you will understand my problem. I want to make virtual folder called "Virtual/label1-threads". This folder should have: 1. messages labeled fe. $label1 from INBOX and 2. messages from Sent folder inthread refs with those labeled. message1 <-- $label1 INBOX |message2 <- Sent -

Re: [Dovecot] changing flags automatically

2013-03-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 14:56 +0100, Lutz Preßler wrote: > Hello, > > (2.2:) there is no doveadm subcommand to change flags of messages, is it? Nope. > The following should work reliably? > > # mark messages with subject $SUBJECT in mailbox $MAILBOX of user $USERID as > read > ( i=2 > echo "1

[Dovecot] changing flags automatically

2013-03-28 Thread Lutz Preßler
Hello, (2.2:) there is no doveadm subcommand to change flags of messages, is it? The following should work reliably? # mark messages with subject $SUBJECT in mailbox $MAILBOX of user $USERID as read ( i=2 echo "1 SELECT "$MAILBOX doveadm search -u $USERID mailbox $MAILBOX subject "$SUBJECT"

[Dovecot] Conversion from Evolution maildir to imap

2013-03-28 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, A customer has a thin-client server with 100+ homedirs with Evolution. They are using POP3 and maildir. Now I want to switch to IMAP. Can I use Dovecot on this maildirs, or does Evolution use another kind of maildir? Does Dovecot change anything in the maildirs? Do I loose my flags this

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot v-2.0, postfix+mysql configuration issue.

2013-03-28 Thread Vimuth
Thank you very much for replying Mr Oli. Ummm Im confused. Could you please kindly mention as to how I should mention the user query? If I may speak though following are the mysql statements I used to create the tables n etc.. GRANT SELECT ON mailserver.* TO 'mailuser'@'127.0.0.1' IDENTIFIED BY 'm

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot v-2.0, postfix+mysql configuration issue.

2013-03-28 Thread Oli Schacher
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:48:42 +0530 Vimuth wrote: > Mar 26 07:00:44 box1 dovecot: auth: Error: sql(vim...@mydomain.rock): > User query failed: Table 'mailserver.users' doesn't exist (using > built-in default user_query: SELECT home, uid, gid FROM users WHERE > username = '%n' AND domain = '%d') >