Am 03.10.2012 21:48, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> I'm looking for some advice to do a really advanced trick with Dovecot.
> I'm not sure if this can be done. I need to describe first.
>
> I have a spam filtering company that does front end spam filtering.
> (Junk Email Filter) I want to add a system whe
El 03/10/12 15:27, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 3.10.2012, at 9.20, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 02/10/12 21:38, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 26.9.2012, at 13.55, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
doveadm search -S /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb -u ${user} SAVEDSINCE 5w | while
read guid uid; do
doveadm fetch
On 10/3/2012 9:58 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to eliminate the subscription file and have it just list
the folders that are there. How do I do that?
Dovecot allows to automatically subscribe folders when mails are delivered:
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
RFC 3501 t
Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'd like to eliminate the subscription file and have it just list
> the folders that are there. How do I do that?
Dovecot allows to automatically subscribe folders when mails are delivered:
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
RFC 3501 tells that the server side MUST NOT unilatera
I'd like to eliminate the subscription file and have it just list the
folders that are there. How do I do that?
Thanks in advance.
On 10/3/2012 4:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.10.2012, at 2.42, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/3/2012 1:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maildir, layout=fs
/var/vmail/domain/user/
Spams get delivered there. User has access there. Domain admin has
mail_location=/var/vmail/domain, you have mail_locati
On 10/2/2012 2:39 PM, Cor Bosman wrote:
Anyone else with NFS mailspools seeing this?
Yes, it is like 1999 all over again. I haven't had a chance to track
them down or setup a cron job to rm them all. All of the ones I'm
seeing are ex dovecot.index files but it looks like yours are ex messag
On 10/3/2012 4:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.10.2012, at 2.42, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/3/2012 1:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maildir, layout=fs
/var/vmail/domain/user/
Spams get delivered there. User has access there. Domain admin has
mail_location=/var/vmail/domain, you have mail_locati
On 4.10.2012, at 2.42, Marc Perkel wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 1:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Maildir, layout=fs
>> /var/vmail/domain/user/
>>
>> Spams get delivered there. User has access there. Domain admin has
>> mail_location=/var/vmail/domain, you have mail_location=/var/vmail
> I'm a little co
I'm a little confused. What about the cur, new, and tmp directories? How
does that fit in?
On 10/3/2012 1:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maildir, layout=fs
/var/vmail/domain/user/
Spams get delivered there. User has access there. Domain admin has
mail_location=/var/vmail/domain, you have mail_lo
On 3.10.2012, at 22.26, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
> Is it possible to have separate userdb lookups for LMTP and POP/IMAP?
protocol lmtp {
userdb {
..
}
}
protocol !lmtp {
userdb {
..
}
}
On 03. okt. 2012 21:48, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice to do a really advanced trick with
Dovecot. I'm not sure if this can be done. I need to describe first.
I have a spam filtering company that does front end spam filtering.
(Junk Email Filter) I want to add a system wh
Maildir, layout=fs
/var/vmail/domain/user/
Spams get delivered there. User has access there. Domain admin has
mail_location=/var/vmail/domain, you have mail_location=/var/vmail
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some
If you ever figure out how to do this, I've got an excellent name for
it: MailWatch
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mailwatch/
steve
On 10/3/2012 3:48 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice to do a really advanced trick with
Dovecot. I'm not sure if this can be done. I need
Hi Marc, i solved this using an automated report for users quarantine. In
front of dovecot i have 2 mailscanner boxes that stores spam emails in
quarantine and logs them to a database, periodically there is a script that
sends an html report to users that recieved spam in the last interval (1h,
4h,
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice to do a really advanced trick with Dovecot.
I'm not sure if this can be done. I need to describe first.
I have a spam filtering company that does front end spam filtering.
(Junk Email Filter) I want to add a system where I store a copy of spam
on a server and
Is it possible to have separate userdb lookups for LMTP and POP/IMAP?
Maybe it's a cross program issue?
We used to randomly have this happen a long time ago, when using
postfix and dovecot.
Since switching to using the dovecot lda/lmtp instead of postfix for
mailbox delievery, I haven't seen this happen at all anymore.
I'm not saying that postfix is at faul
On 10/3/2012 10:03 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-10-03 10:34 AM, l...@airstreamcomm.net
wrote:
In the docs it states that LDA " ...takes mail from anMTAand delivers
it to a user's mailbox, while keeping Dovecot index files up to
date." I am wondering if LMTP also interacts with the Doveco
On 2012-10-03 10:34 AM, l...@airstreamcomm.net
wrote:
In the docs it states that LDA " ...takes mail from anMTAand delivers
it to a user's mailbox, while keeping Dovecot index files up to
date." I am wondering if LMTP also interacts with the Dovecot index
files and keeps them up to date?
Y
On 10/3/2012 9:34 AM, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
In the docs it states that LDA " ...takes mail from anMTAand delivers
it to a user's mailbox, while keeping Dovecot index files up to
date." I am wondering if LMTP also interacts with the Dovecot index
files and keeps them up to date?
Bra
In the docs it states that LDA " ...takes mail from anMTAand delivers it
to a user's mailbox, while keeping Dovecot index files up to date." I
am wondering if LMTP also interacts with the Dovecot index files and
keeps them up to date?
Am 03.10.2012 02:50, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 02:10 +0200, Florian Zeitz wrote:
>> Attached is a new export incorporating your feedback.
>
> Committed. Also what do you think about the attached patch? (Compiles,
> untested.)
>
Moving the passdb parsing into a separate functi
On 3.10.2012, at 9.20, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> El 02/10/12 21:38, Timo Sirainen escribió:
>> On 26.9.2012, at 13.55, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>>
>>> doveadm search -S /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb -u ${user} SAVEDSINCE 5w |
>>> while read guid uid; do
>>> doveadm fetch -S /var/run/dovecot/auth-use
On 3.10.2012, at 9.25, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>>> I think I have found the source of the problem, although I don't know
>>> how to fix it. The problem is that I have different results if I ask for
>>> user information with just the login or with the whole email:
>>
>> Flush both the user and
25 matches
Mail list logo
