On 7/6/2012 2:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> You wouldn't partition the large LUN. You'd simply directly format it
>> with XFS. Laying a partition table on it would introduce the real
>
> Fine. i understand that. What i am suggesting is not making large LUNs.
> you get the best performance
On 6.7.2012, at 23.28, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
> Thanks, that certainly helps identify the configuration options. However I am
> more concerned about the experiences of others who have actually used the
> replication. What is the rate of change on your mail cluster, how many
> concurrent
On 7.7.2012, at 3.38, Joseph Tam wrote:
> #0 i_panic (format=0xff2302f8 "Trying to allocate %u bytes") at
> failures.c:259
> #1 0xff2068a4 in pool_alloconly_malloc (pool=0x60330, size=0) at
> mempool-alloconly.c:259
> #2 0x00018248 in client_uidls_save (client=0x54d28) at
>
I noticed a bunch of crashes when Gmail users tried to slurp up their
(empty) mailboxes. The problem is not noticed by clients though, but
it crashes the pop3 process.
POP3 session
S: +OK Ready.
C: USER user
S: +OK
C: PASS password
S: +OK Logged in.
On 7/5/12 10:08 PM, Костырев Александр Алексеевич wrote:
use the search, Luke)
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/064512.html
this thread was all that I needed to setup replication for testing.
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@do
On 6 July 2012 12:41, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> do you really think it is a good idea to trash someone else's comments
>> (without contributing anything at all I might add) based on pure
>> ass-u-me-ptions of yours that have no basis in reality?
>
>
> Do you hate yourself of not being able to u
do you really think it is a good idea to trash someone else's comments
(without contributing anything at all I might add) based on pure
ass-u-me-ptions of yours that have no basis in reality?
Do you hate yourself of not being able to understand normal response and
so - getting agressive agai
Op 7/6/2012 5:10 PM, e-frog schreef:
On 06.07.2012 16:46, wrote Vyacheslav Biruk:
But when I use following script - the flag is not set in \Seen
require ["fileinto","imap4flags"];
# rule:[test]
if anyof (header :contains "Subject" "test")
{
fileinto "INBOX.SPAM";
setflag "\\
On 06.07.2012 16:46, wrote Vyacheslav Biruk:
Hello,
I use
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p7 i386
dovecot-2.1.6
dovecot-pigeonhole-0.3.0_1
I have the following problem:
But when I use following script - the flag is not set in \Seen
require ["fileinto","imap4flags"];
# rule:[test]
if anyof (header :co
Hello,
I use
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p7 i386
dovecot-2.1.6
dovecot-pigeonhole-0.3.0_1
I have the following problem:
When I use the following script - the flag is set in \Seen :
require ["imap4flags"];
# rule:[test]
if anyof (header :contains "Subject" "test")
{
setflag "\\Seen";
Hello,
Just as an experiment I changed the separator from . to / restarted dovecot
(v2.1.1).
When adding an existing account with lots of mail folders to thunderbird
everything still seems to work.
My directory layout is like this:
.Info.mailinglists
.Info.mailinglists.Horde
.Info.mailinglis
Hello,
I've been trying to get shared mailboxes to work and got stuck.
I tried lots of examples made the shared dict but the shared mail boxes never
showed up.
I am using the . separator and I think this the problem.
I changed it to a / separator and now I could see my shared mailboxes.
Check
Am 06.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> Again - just please stay silent if you don't have anything positive to
> contribute - and yes, you often do actually
> contribute positive things, and you definitely have some knowledge to share,
> but again, your tone and manner are
> almost alway
On 2012-07-06 5:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
where do you see anything offending in my reply?
Your tone is almost always offending, Reindl - and you quite often throw
in a good dose of very offending cursing to boot (admittedly not this
time though)... basically, I just don't like your genera
Am 06.07.2012 11:26, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2012-07-05 6:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> do you really think it is a good idea to start with a pre-installed
>> FREE operating system instead doing a fresh install?
>
> do you really think it is a good idea to trash someone else's comments
>
On 2012-07-05 6:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.07.2012 12:33, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-07-05 5:45 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
FreeBSD 8.2 x64 running on VMware
Do you (or anyone else) know of any decent VMWare images
(appliance) of current version of FreeBSD? I've been debating on
swit
You wouldn't partition the large LUN. You'd simply directly format it
with XFS. Laying a partition table on it would introduce the real
Fine. i understand that. What i am suggesting is not making large LUNs.
you get the best performance with directly attaching disks to your
machine.
El 05/07/12 16:46, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 5.7.2012, at 15.55, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Concluding... in my systems, with users with hugh mail folders
(thousands of mails) in maildir format, disabling rdirplus with mount options
(mount option nordirplus) increases performance (maybe w
18 matches
Mail list logo
