Lutz Schildt posted this to the Gentoo bugzilla recently:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415571
There's a backtrace and conf files attached. I was able to find this
possibly-related post from a while ago:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052963.html
Hi,
in my dovecot setup the accounting database table shows wrong
values which do not correspond with the actual disk space used.
The disk usage says 2.6 Gigabytes:
mail01:~# du -sh /mail/dovecot/example.org/username
2.6G /mail/dovecot/example.org/username
While the doveadm quota get says 7 Gig
On 5/12/2012 2:32 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
>> Mail is always a random IO workload, unless your mailbox count is 1,
>> whether accessing indexes or mail files. Regarding the other two
>> questions, you'll likely need to take your own measurements.
>
> Wait, maybe there is a misunderstanding. I mean t
On 12-05-2012 20:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.05.2012 20:35, schrieb Luuk@dovecot:
>> On 12-05-2012 19:48, Gedalya wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand you sent an email to yourself?
>>> If you gained one $message_size upon reception and lost 2*$message_size
>>> upon deletion from Inbox+Sent, I would
Am 12.05.2012 20:35, schrieb Luuk@dovecot:
> On 12-05-2012 19:48, Gedalya wrote:
>>
>> I understand you sent an email to yourself?
>> If you gained one $message_size upon reception and lost 2*$message_size
>> upon deletion from Inbox+Sent, I would suspect quota plugin isn't active
>> when the mess
On 12-05-2012 19:48, Gedalya wrote:
>
> I understand you sent an email to yourself?
> If you gained one $message_size upon reception and lost 2*$message_size
> upon deletion from Inbox+Sent, I would suspect quota plugin isn't active
> when the message is being delivered. How are messages delivered
On 5/12/2012 1:34 PM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
On 12-05-2012 18:40, Gedalya wrote:
On 5/12/2012 12:21 PM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
On 12-05-2012 18:00, Gedalya wrote:
On 5/12/2012 11:42 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
In the log, the following message showed:
2012-05-12 17:11:43 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
net_c
On 12-05-2012 18:40, Gedalya wrote:
> On 5/12/2012 12:21 PM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>> On 12-05-2012 18:00, Gedalya wrote:
>>> On 5/12/2012 11:42 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
In the log, the following message showed:
2012-05-12 17:11:43 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
net_connect_unix(/var/run/dov
On 5/12/2012 2:26 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
> The indexes are doing a lot of iops on the metrocluster, and it's a bit
> of an expensive option for something it's not even that good at.
This clears things up a bit.
> Im aiming for something with 2 servers, each with a 12 disk enclosure
> with SSD fo
On 5/12/2012 12:21 PM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
On 12-05-2012 18:00, Gedalya wrote:
On 5/12/2012 11:42 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
In the log, the following message showed:
2012-05-12 17:11:43 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/quota-warning.sh) failed: No such file
or directory
On 12-05-2012 18:00, Gedalya wrote:
> On 5/12/2012 11:42 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>> In the log, the following message showed:
>> 2012-05-12 17:11:43 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
>> net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/quota-warning.sh) failed: No such file
>> or directory
>>
>> I think i have to revert t
On 12-05-2012 18:02, Gedalya wrote:
> On 5/12/2012 11:59 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>> 2012-05-12 17:50:22 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
>> net_connect_unix(/usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh) failed: Permission
>> denied (euid=1000(luuk) egid=100(users) missing +w perm:
>> /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh, d
On 5/12/2012 11:59 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
2012-05-12 17:50:22 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
net_connect_unix(/usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh) failed: Permission
denied (euid=1000(luuk) egid=100(users) missing +w perm:
/usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh, dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755)
This is net_connect
On 5/12/2012 11:42 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
In the log, the following message showed:
2012-05-12 17:11:43 imap(luuk): Error: quota:
net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/quota-warning.sh) failed: No such file
or directory
I think i have to revert the changes, and retest.;)
Wiki says: quota_warn
On 12-05-2012 17:42, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
> On 12-05-2012 15:55, Gedalya wrote:
>> On 05/12/2012 04:50 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>>> It seems i am at 79% of my quota
>>> so, i added a line to conf.d/90-quota.conf, to get a wraning when quota
>>> exceeds 10%:
>> Quota warnings are only sent when you _c
On 12-05-2012 15:55, Gedalya wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 04:50 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>> It seems i am at 79% of my quota
>> so, i added a line to conf.d/90-quota.conf, to get a wraning when quota
>> exceeds 10%:
> Quota warnings are only sent when you _cross_ the limit, they are not
> sent (again) whe
On 05/12/2012 04:50 AM, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
It seems i am at 79% of my quota
so, i added a line to conf.d/90-quota.conf, to get a wraning when quota
exceeds 10%:
Quota warnings are only sent when you _cross_ the limit, they are not
sent (again) when you are already over the limit.
So, in your c
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 at 12:37:25 UTC, dove...@vosslamber.nl confabulated:
> On 12-05-2012 10:50, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
>> I think i have quota setup correctly, but finally time arrived to check
>> that ;)
>>
> ...
>> But this message is never send, what am i missing (in my config)?
>>
> dov
On 12-05-2012 10:50, Luuk@dovecot wrote:
> I think i have quota setup correctly, but finally time arrived to check
> that ;)
>
...
> But this message is never send, what am i missing (in my config)?
>
dovecot -n:
# 2.0.16: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.1.10-1.9-desktop x86_64 openSUSE
I think i have quota setup correctly, but finally time arrived to check
that ;)
opensuse:/etc/dovecot # doveadm quota get -u luuk
Quota name Type Value Limit %
User quota STORAGE 571973 716800 79
User quota MESSAGE 4 - 0
It seems i am at 79% of my quota
so, i added a line to conf.d/90-
On 12.5.2012, at 10.32, Cor Bosman wrote:
>> Mail is always a random IO workload, unless your mailbox count is 1,
>> whether accessing indexes or mail files. Regarding the other two
>> questions, you'll likely need to take your own measurements.
>
> Wait, maybe there is a misunderstanding. I mea
> Mail is always a random IO workload, unless your mailbox count is 1,
> whether accessing indexes or mail files. Regarding the other two
> questions, you'll likely need to take your own measurements.
Wait, maybe there is a misunderstanding. I mean the IO inside one
index file, not across the dif
>
>> Alternatively, does anyone have any experience with other redundant storage
>> options? Im thinking things like MooseFS, DRBD, etc?
>
> You seem to be interested in multi-site clustering/failover solutions,
> not simply redundant storage. These two are clustering software
> solutions but
23 matches
Mail list logo