On 4/13/2012 10:31 AM, Ed W wrote:
> You mean those "answers" like:
> "you need to read 'those' articles again"
>
> Referring to some unknown and hard to find previous emails is not the
> same as answering?
No, referring to this:
On 4/12/2012 5:58 AM, Ed W wrote:
> The claim by ZFS/BTRFS
On 4/13/2012 10:31 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 13/04/2012 13:33, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> In closing, I'll simply say this: If hardware, whether a mobo-down SATA
>> chip, or a $100K SGI SAN RAID controller, allowed silent data corruption
>> or transmission to occur, there would be no storage industry, an
On 30 Mar 2012, at 12:29, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I've configured the dspam anti spam plugin, but it doesn't appear to be doing
> anything when I move mail between mailboxes. Can anyone help me determine
> what's going on?
>
> The plugin appears to be loading; at least if I don't define al
Hi,
I've got two questions regarding imapc and namespaces:
1) Is there a way of stating, that I only want part of the hierarchy on
the end of an imapc connection to be available here? My "problem":
On the other end the layout is:
INBOX.Shared.{some,nice,folders}
If I mirror this into my doveco
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Ed W wrote:
On 13/04/2012 13:33, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
What I meant wasn't the drive throwing uncorrectable read errors but
the drives are returning different data that each think is correct or
both may have sent the correct data but one of the set got corrupted
on the fly.
On 13.4.2012, at 20.51, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> would it be possible to use
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/Pipe
>
> to gpg sign archived mail, incoming via lmtp
>
> the intention is to store all archived mail gpg signed
> to notice some changes the mails at possible re
hi @ll
would it be possible to use
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/Pipe
to gpg sign archived mail, incoming via lmtp
the intention is to store all archived mail gpg signed
to notice some changes the mails at possible restore case
has anyone done it bevor , or something equal
On 04/13/12 02:35, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
> you can do it with exchange,
> no wonder outlook isnt a internet mail client in first line
> its the client of exchange, so people should use real internet mail
> clients ( TB etc ), if m$ would more be compatible, the need of exchange
> may more les
On 04/13/12 02:22, Birta Levente wrote:
>>
>> Outlook (2003, 2007) does do this if you set up different mail accounts,
>> but we shouldn't have to do that.
>
> Control Panel / E-mail (Mail in win7) / Profiles ...
>
> I hope this help you
This is more work than setting up multiple accounts =
On 13/04/2012 13:33, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
What I meant wasn't the drive throwing uncorrectable read errors but
the drives are returning different data that each think is correct or
both may have sent the correct data but one of the set got corrupted
on the fly. After reading the articles posted,
On 13/04/2012 06:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 4/12/2012 5:58 AM, Ed W wrote:
The claim by ZFS/BTRFS authors and others is that data silently "bit
rots" on it's own. The claim is therefore that you can have a raid1 pair
where neither drive reports a hardware failure, but each gives you
different
Hello
Maybe it's a coincidence but it "seems"
since I upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.1.3
that some French characters ( a with accents by example )
are not well displayed anymore using thunderbird and are
replaced by a "?" character
Thanks for any info
On 13.4.2012, at 17.32, Root Kev wrote:
> 643 dovecot 20 0 3096 1616 1208 S 50.7 0.2 0:01.76
> auth
Well, I can't think of any good reason for this. Try strace -p 643 (or whatever
pid of the process eating CPU) for a few seconds and send its output? Also
maybe get a couple of gdb backt
I tried making the changes that you suggested but it didn't seem to make a
noticeable difference. It should be using the shadow file directly. The
shadow file has the default Ubuntu system accounts and 16 user accounts, so
overall fairly small. The nsswitch.conf file is set as default:
# /etc/nss
On 4/13/2012 8:12 AM, Jim Lawson wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 08:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> What I meant wasn't the drive throwing uncorrectable read errors but
>>> the drives are returning different data that each think is correct or
>>> both may have sent the correct data but one of the set got co
On 13/04/2012 13:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 13.4.2012, at 15.17, Ed W wrote:
On 13/04/2012 12:51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- Use the checksums to assist with replication speed/efficiency (dsync or
custom imap commands)
It would be of some use with dbox index rebuilding. I don't think it would h
On 04/13/2012 08:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> What I meant wasn't the drive throwing uncorrectable read errors but
>> the drives are returning different data that each think is correct or
>> both may have sent the correct data but one of the set got corrupted
>> on the fly. After reading the arti
On 4/13/2012 1:12 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 4/12/12, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 4/11/2012 9:23 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> I suppose the controller could throw an error if
>>> the two drives returned data that didn't agree with each other but it
>>> wouldn't know which is the accurat
On 13.4.2012, at 15.17, Ed W wrote:
> On 13/04/2012 12:51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> - Use the checksums to assist with replication speed/efficiency (dsync or
>>> custom imap commands)
>> It would be of some use with dbox index rebuilding. I don't think it would
>> help with dsync.
> ..
>>> - Fil
On 13/04/2012 12:51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- Use the checksums to assist with replication speed/efficiency (dsync or
custom imap commands)
It would be of some use with dbox index rebuilding. I don't think it would help
with dsync.
..
- File RFCs for new imap features along the "lemonde" lines
On 12.4.2012, at 23.46, Root Kev wrote:
> I hope someone can help me, I have been testing out Dovecot to switch from
> popa3d which I use at the moment. When I get several users connecting and
> disconnection multiple times, the Dovecot process with command Auth uses
> 50-90% of the CPU for the p
On 12.4.2012, at 15.10, Ed W wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 12:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 12.4.2012, at 13.58, Ed W wrote:
>>
>>> The claim by ZFS/BTRFS authors and others is that data silently "bit rots"
>>> on it's own. The claim is therefore that you can have a raid1 pair where
>>> neither drive
Il giorno 13/apr/2012, alle ore 01.33, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
> Nothing to do with Dovecot, but I figured this is the best place to ask.
>
> Do any of the newer versions of Outlook have proper identities support
> like Thunderbird, mutt, Roundcube, i.e. every other mail client on Earth?
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
