Am 28.02.2012 20:26, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:26:11 +0100, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
>> Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
>>> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older
>>> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone
> everything?
That's the way to go. Makes things better, but I've found three more
dependencies. This patch is against the daily snapshot 20120228.
(Sorry for the changes to Makefile.in which you won't need. But this way
I don't have to rebuild Makefile.in from Makefile.am wh
On 02/28/2012 08:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 21.04, Emiliano Rago wrote:
USER#0113607363585#011rago#011uid=5000#011gid=5000#011home=/#011master_user=rago#011master_user=admin
Oh, right, it doesn't work because there are two master_users and the second
one overrides the first
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> With 2.0.18 I was using a quota warning script like this:
Must have been a PEBKAC - I fixed my installation by harmonising
$PREFIX (seperate $PREFIX for 2.0 and 2.1, removig an old installation
along the way) as well as cleaning up some old scripts and alas:
Feb 28 22:13:15
On 2012-02-28 9:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:27 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my
previo
On 28/02/2012 18:11, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older
than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this
cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One
idea was to execute the tras
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:26:11 +0100, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
>> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older
>> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did
>> this
>> cause logins to slow dow
On 28.2.2012, at 21.04, Emiliano Rago wrote:
> USER#0113607363585#011rago#011uid=5000#011gid=5000#011home=/#011master_user=rago#011master_user=admin
Oh, right, it doesn't work because there are two master_users and the second
one overrides the first one. This might be fixed in a newer version (m
On 02/28/2012 07:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 20.45, Emiliano Rago wrote:
userdb {
args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
driver = static
}
Thanks,
but nothing has changed.
Set auth_debug=yes. What does it log when you login?
That's t
With 2.0.18 I was using a quota warning script like this:
plugin {
...
# Quota
quota = maildir
quota_rule = INBOX.Trash:storage=+2048M
quota_warning = storage=99%% quota-warning 99 %u
quota_warning2 = storage=95%% quota-warning 95 %u
quota_warning3 = storage=90%% quota-warning 90 %u
q
On 28.2.2012, at 20.45, Emiliano Rago wrote:
>> userdb {
>> args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
>> driver = static
>> }
>
> Thanks,
> but nothing has changed.
Set auth_debug=yes. What does it log when you login?
Admittedly, it's not a valid folder name and dovecot is right in
removing it:
Feb 28 17:50:05 postamt dovecot: imap(kbaessle): Warning: Subscriptions file
/home/k/b/kbaessle/Maildir/subscriptions: Removing invalid entry: Entw�rfe
...but when looking at the subscription file AFTER the removal, th
On 02/28/2012 04:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:11 +, Emiliano Rago wrote:
I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared
On 28.2.2012, at 20.29, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Off the top of your head, do you know if Cyrus or GMail (I guess the two
> other most popular IMAP servers that support server side indexes) advertise
> SEARCH=FUZZY?
Neither. Probably no servers besides Dovecot. But it is less than a year old
RF
On 2012-02-28 11:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 18.38, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can
be quite certain that it supports indexed server side searches.
I meant SEARCH=FUZZY
Thanks for the replies Timo...
Off the top of yo
Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older
> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this
> cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One
> idea was to execute
We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older
than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this
cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One
idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their
logins an
Hello all,
We currently have a traditional mail server where all users have system
accounts (ie entries in the NIS passwd map) and mbox-format mail folders in
their (system) home directories.
I'm trying to setup a dovecot server in which we want all users to have
"virtual" accounts (in dovec
On 28.2.2012, at 18.38, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can be quite
> certain that it supports indexed server side searches.
I meant SEARCH=FUZZY
> And that reminds me, I should hide that extension when FTS isn't enabled in
> Dovecot..
v2.
On 28.2.2012, at 18.33, Charles Marcus wrote:
> This question is a result of an ongoing discussion on the mozilla enterprise
> list...
>
> Is there a standard/reliable way for an IMAP client to determine that an IMAP
> server supports server side search
All IMAP servers are required to support
Hey Timo,
Subject says it all...
This question is a result of an ongoing discussion on the mozilla
enterprise list...
Is there a standard/reliable way for an IMAP client to determine that an
IMAP server supports server side search (with indexes)?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now correctly uses server side search?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:11 +, Emiliano Rago wrote:
> I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
> I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
> userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared mailboxes.
> I can authenticate to the ser
Hi,
I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared mailboxes.
I can authenticate to the server but I am not able to list the mailboxes:
emiliano@dov
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:47 +0100, kfx wrote:
> > Did you enable the 'Run search on server' option in the Advanced Search
> > window? Doing this *should* result in Thunderbird using dovecots indexes
> > server side.
> >
>
> Yes I did.
>
> Some more info:
>
> by telnet'ing directly and issuing:
>
On 02/28/2012 03:23 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in Su
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:27 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
>
>
>
> Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my
> previous question about setting up two
On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my
previous question about setting up two servers in two different
locations to serve two different sets of use
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:02 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Does anybody have any numbers for how large storage one will need for
> the fts indexing server? I see the wiki says 30% of mailbox size for
> Squat (partial=4 full=4). Is it similar for lucene/solr?
My initial tests for CLucene were
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in SubFolder
but thunderbird returns nothing (it s
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 14:41 +0100, kfx wrote:
> but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello"
> for example).
Test by talking IMAP protocol, not by using Thunderbird.
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
This design can be used to build at least two different types of dsync
clusters, which are both described here. Ville has also drawn overview
pictures of these two setups, see
http://www.dovecot.org/img/dsync-director-replicat
Does anybody have any numbers for how large storage one will need for
the fts indexing server? I see the wiki says 30% of mailbox size for
Squat (partial=4 full=4). Is it similar for lucene/solr?
Do I understand correctly if I think
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Lucene
will create an inde
On 02/28/2012 03:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins
= fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running
doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors.
I ra
On 2012-02-28 6:14 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
Some IMAP clients (especially outlooks) create junk/sent/etc.
folders with various names, depending on national settings.
Is it possible to provide a - let's say - dictionary, which would always
return the same folder (like Sent) no matter if client as
On 2012-02-27 9:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
However, whenever I run a search thru thunderbird (searching the
from/to/subject/body fields),
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP.
You could test by opening the Advance
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:31:35 +0100
S. Kremer articulated:
Every user's mailbox has a directory called Spam and Ham. I scan this
two folders by a script to learn my spamassassin database.
This script does not scan folders like spam, ham, junk-email etc.
But some
automx
I am pleased to announce automx a tool that makes setting up a mail account
easy. All your users need to provide is real name, mail address and password.
Their mail client and automx will safely handle the rest.
Say goodbye to mistyped server settings! Put an end to endless phone calls
try
On 28.2.2012, at 12.15, Robin wrote:
> I too was bitten by the configuration issue. The wiki/docs suggest that you
> only need to put the fts fts_solr plugin spec into imap "section", which
> never worked for me, unlike fts_squat which did). Putting it into the
> "global" plugin list made it a
Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the
LMTP.
t.
Urban Loesch-2 wrote:
>
> Same here on 2.0.x.
> But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP.
>
> See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago:
>
> ...
>
> Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
>
> I
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP. You can test
this by talking IMAP protocol directly:
telnet localhost 143
a login user pass
b select inbox
c search text hello
Yes, you definitely want to check things are being accelerated by
issuing direct IMAP commands via teln
Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the
LMTP.
t.
Urban Loesch-2 wrote:
>
> Same here on 2.0.x.
> But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP.
>
> See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago:
>
> ...
>
> Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
>
> I
Am 28.02.2012 um 09:46 schrieb Thomas Leuxner:
> Assuming this is the task you could also use:
>
> $ doveadm expunge -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 unseen
>
> Play around with the scope a bit before you actually run it:
>
> $ doveadm search -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 u
Am 28.02.2012 um 09:17 schrieb Nick Warr:
> Il 28/02/2012 9.09, Jacek Osiecki ha scritto:
>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote:
>>
I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove
downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been
successfully
Il 28/02/2012 9.09, Jacek Osiecki ha scritto:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote:
I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove
downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been
successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have
been
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote:
I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove
downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been
successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have been
configured to save copy of messages in the Serve
47 matches
Mail list logo
