On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 7.1.2012, at 5.36, Yubao Liu wrote:
>
>> In old version, "auth->passdbs" contains all passdbs, this revision
>> changes "auth->passdbs" to only contain non-master passdbs.
>>
>> I'm not sure which fix is better or even my proposal is corr
Am 09.01.2012 19:12, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 9.1.2012, at 18.19, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> i am afraid i wasnt total corect here
>> in fact i havent seen backscatter overquota on my servers
>> since using dove lmtp with postfix
>
> LMTP shouldn't matter here. In most configs mails are put
On 1/9/2012 7:48 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> It seems my initial idea was not so bad after all ;)
Yeah, but you didn't know how "not so bad" it really was until you had
me analyze it, flesh it out, and confirm it. ;)
> Now I "just" need o
> built a little test setup, put some dummy users on it an
On 10.1.2012, at 2.21, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>> Did you look at the input? Looking at the code, it should be lowercased.
>> Maybe Solr just uppercases it for some reason. Are you using a Solr schema
>> that has "cc" field?
>
> I see the following in a running Solr instance. This is generated
On 1/9/2012 7:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 1.48, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba
On 9.1.2012, at 22.23, Urban Loesch wrote:
>>> I'm using two dovecot pop3/imap proxies in front of our dovecot servers.
>>> Since some days I see many of the following errors in the logs of the two
>>> proxy-servers:
>>>
>>> dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: Remote "IPV6-IP":110 disconnected:
That's it, thanks a lot.
- Original Nachricht
Von: Timo Sirainen
An: xa...@arcor.de
Datum: 09.01.2012 19:44
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] uid / gid and systemusers
> On 8.1.2012, at 17.37, xa...@arcor.de wrote:
>
> > Jan 8 16:18:28 test dovecot: User q is missing UID (see mail_u
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 22.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> | location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
What is the syntax of this location? What does "imapc-shared" do in
this case?
>>
>>> It's the direc
Am 09.01.2012 19:40, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 9.1.2012, at 12.18, Urban Loesch wrote:
I'm using two dovecot pop3/imap proxies in front of our dovecot servers.
Since some days I see many of the following errors in the logs of the two
proxy-servers:
dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: Remote
On 9.1.2012, at 22.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> | location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
>>>
>>> What is the syntax of this location? What does "imapc-shared" do in this
>>> case?
>
>> It's the directory for index files. The back
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
| location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
>>
>> What is the syntax of this location? What does "imapc-shared" do in this
>> case?
> It's the directory for index files. The backend IMAP server is used as
> a rather dummy storage, so
On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> | location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
>
> What is the syntax of this location? What does "imapc-shared" do in this
> case?
It's the directory for index files. The backend IMAP server is used as a rather
dummy storage, so if for example you do a FETCH
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 21.31, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> ,
>> | # User's private mail location
>> | mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox
>> |
>> | # When creating any namespaces, you must also have a private namespace:
>> | namespace {
>> | type = private
>> | separator = .
>> | pre
On 9.1.2012, at 21.31, Sven Hartge wrote:
> ,
> | # User's private mail location
> | mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox
> |
> | # When creating any namespaces, you must also have a private namespace:
> | namespace {
> | type = private
> | separator = .
> | prefix = INBOX.
> | #location defa
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 20.47, Sven Hartge wrote:
Can "mmap_disable = yes" and the other NFS options be set per
namespace or only globally?
>>
>>> Currently only globally.
>>
>> Ah, too bad.
>>
>> Back to the drawing board then.
> mmap_disable=yes works pretty well ev
On 6.1.2012, at 19.35, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Solr plugin appears to break when mailbox names have an ampersand in the
> name. The messages appear to indicate '&' gets translated to '&--'.
What message? With fts=solr (not solr_old) the mailbox name isn't used in Solr
at all. It uses mailbox
On 6.1.2012, at 18.37, mailinglist wrote:
> Installed dovcot from Debian .deb file. Creating a new account for system
> users sets permission for user-only. Where to change initial permissions on
> creation of mail folder and other subdirectories.
Permissions for folders are taken from the mail
On 9.1.2012, at 21.16, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> passdb {
> type = static
> args = user=shareduser
Of course you should also require a password:
args = user=shareduser pass=master-user-password
On 9.1.2012, at 20.47, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> Can "mmap_disable = yes" and the other NFS options be set per
>>> namespace or only globally?
>
>> Currently only globally.
>
> Ah, too bad.
>
> Back to the drawing board then.
mmap_disable=yes works pretty well even if you're only using it for loc
On 1/6/2012 3:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.1.2012, at 0.10, David Egbert wrote:
Anyway, readdir() is failing with ELOOP. Does it always fail with "Too many levels of symbolic
links" or is it sometimes different? This sounds like a bug in Linux NFS client code. You can
reproduce this alway
On 1/9/2012 12:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 17.32, Noel wrote:
>
> Cool.
> Does this just check for valid user existence, or can it also check
> for over-quota (and respond 500 overquota I suppose)?
> Hmm. That looked potentially useful, but Postfix doesn't seem to support it
> at
On 7.1.2012, at 5.36, Yubao Liu wrote:
> In old version, "auth->passdbs" contains all passdbs, this revision
> changes "auth->passdbs" to only contain non-master passdbs.
>
> I'm not sure which fix is better or even my proposal is correct or fully:
> a) in src/auth/auth.c:auth_passdb_preinit(),
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 20.25, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount
the shared f
On 8.1.2012, at 17.37, xa...@arcor.de wrote:
> Jan 8 16:18:28 test dovecot: User q is missing UID (see mail_uid setting)
> Jan 8 16:18:28 test dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure (auth
> failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD,
> lip=EEE.FFF.GGG.HHH TLS<--- ed
On 9.1.2012, at 7.34, Michael Papet wrote:
> LDA logging worked. So, it could be something about my system. But,
> running /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver still doesn't return a value on the command
> line as documented on the wiki.
>
> I've attached strace files from both the malfunctioning Debian
On 9.1.2012, at 12.18, Urban Loesch wrote:
> I'm using two dovecot pop3/imap proxies in front of our dovecot servers.
> Since some days I see many of the following errors in the logs of the two
> proxy-servers:
>
> dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: Remote "IPV6-IP":110 disconnected:
> Connecti
On 9.1.2012, at 16.41, Tom Clark wrote:
> We've got a client with a Blackberry that hass deleted his emails off his
> Blackberry device. The BES won't re-download the messages as it believes it
> has already downloaded them (apparently it matches on UID).
You can delete dovecot.index* and dovecot
On 9.1.2012, at 20.25, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
>>> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
>>> the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the
>>> shared folder filesystem to each ba
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
>> the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the
>> shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server, so each user
>> has potential
On 9.1.2012, at 17.14, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-01-09 9:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> The "proper" solution for this that I've been thinking about would be
>> to use v2.1's imapc backend with master users. So that when user A
>> wants to access user B's shared folder, Dovecot connects to
On 9.1.2012, at 18.19, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> i am afraid i wasnt total corect here
> in fact i havent seen backscatter overquota on my servers
> since using dove lmtp with postfix
LMTP shouldn't matter here. In most configs mails are put to queue first, and
only from there they are sent to
On 9.1.2012, at 17.32, Noel wrote:
> On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
>> "postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
>> protocol. So you can ask:
>>
>> get user@domain
>>
>> and Dovecot answers one of:
>>
Am 09.01.2012 16:50, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 09.01.2012 16:46, schrieb Noel:
>> On 1/9/2012 9:37 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
> "post
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The more I think about your planned architecture the more it reminds
> me of a "shared nothing" database cluster--even a relatively small one
> can outrun a well tuned mainframe, especially doing decision
> support/data mining workloads (TPC-H).
> As long as you're prepare
On 1/9/2012 8:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The quota for students is 1GiB here. If I provide each of my 4 nodes
> with 500GiB of storage space, this gives me 2TiB now, which should be
> sufficient. If a nodes fills, I increase its storage space. Only if it
> fills too fast,
Am 09.01.2012 16:46, schrieb Noel:
> On 1/9/2012 9:37 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
>>> On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
"postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
On 1/9/2012 9:37 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
>> On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
>>> "postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
>>> protocol. So you can ask:
>>>
>>> get
Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
> On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
>> "postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
>> protocol. So you can ask:
>>
>> get user@domain
>>
>> and Dovecot answers one of:
>>
>>
On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
> "postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
> protocol. So you can ask:
>
> get user@domain
>
> and Dovecot answers one of:
>
> - 200 1
> - 500 User not found
> - 400 Inter
On 2012-01-09 9:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The "proper" solution for this that I've been thinking about would be
to use v2.1's imapc backend with master users. So that when user A
wants to access user B's shared folder, Dovecot connects to B's IMAP
server using master user login, and accesses t
* Timo Sirainen :
> On 9.1.2012, at 9.40, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > Today I encoundered these errors:
> >
> > Jan 9 08:30:06 mail dovecot: lmtp(31174, backup@backup.invalid): Error:
> > Log synchronization error at seq=858,offset=44672 for
> > /home/mailboxname/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.ind
On 9.1.2012, at 1.48, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>> On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>
>> Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba dovecot: imap(us...@dom
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
>> the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the
>> shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server, so each user
>> has potential
On 9.1.2012, at 9.40, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Today I encoundered these errors:
>
> Jan 9 08:30:06 mail dovecot: lmtp(31174, backup@backup.invalid): Error: Log
> synchronization error at seq=858,offset=44672 for
> /home/mailboxname/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index: Append with UID 282388,
> b
Too much text in the rest of this thread so I haven't read it, but:
On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just the
> shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the shared
> folder filesystem to each backend sto
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements "postmap"
type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5) protocol. So you can ask:
get user@domain
and Dovecot answers one of:
- 200 1
- 500 User not found
- 400 Internal failure
So you can use this with Postfix:
virtual_mai
Hi,
We've got a client with a Blackberry that hass deleted his emails off his
Blackberry device. The BES won't re-download the messages as it believes it
has already downloaded them (apparently it matches on UID).
Is there any way of resetting a folder (and messages in the folder) UID? I
kn
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 2:15 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Wouldn't such a setup be the "Best of Both Worlds"? Having the main
>> traffic going to local disks (being RDMs) and also being able to provide
>> shared folders to every user who needs them without the need to move
>> those users
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Ah, I forgot: I _already_ have the mechanisms in place to statically
>> redirect/route accesses for users to different backends, since some
>> of the users are already redirected to a different mailsystem at
>> another location of
On 01/09/2012 08:38 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
[...]
>> (Are my words making any sense? I got the feeling I'm writing German with
>> English words and nobody is really understanding anything ...)
>
> You're making perfect sense, and frankly, if not for the
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 9:39 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Memory size. I am a bit hesistant to deploy a VM with 16GB of RAM. My
>> cluster nodes each have 48GB, so no problem on this side though.
> Shouldn't be a problem if you're going to spread the load over 2 to 4
> cluster nodes. 16
On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Ah, I forgot: I _already_ have the mechanisms in place to statically
> redirect/route accesses for users to different backends, since some of
> the users are already redirected to a different mailsystem at another
> location of my university.
I assume you
On 1/8/2012 2:15 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Wouldn't such a setup be the "Best of Both Worlds"? Having the main
> traffic going to local disks (being RDMs) and also being able to provide
> shared folders to every user who needs them without the need to move
> those users onto one server?
The only p
On 1/8/2012 9:39 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Memory size. I am a bit hesistant to deploy a VM with 16GB of RAM. My
> cluster nodes each have 48GB, so no problem on this side though.
Shouldn't be a problem if you're going to spread the load over 2 to 4
cluster nodes. 16/2 = 8GB per VM, 16/4 = 4GB pe
> TB says unknown, and I know why. I have set the class 1 and class 2
> certificate chain keys to the same, when these should be different.
> Damn, StartCom's certs are difficult to set up.
read this: http://binblog.info/2010/02/02/lengthy-chains/
basically, you start with YOUR cert
and work yo
Hi,
I'm using two dovecot pop3/imap proxies in front of our dovecot servers.
Since some days I see many of the following errors in the logs of the two
proxy-servers:
...
dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: Remote "IPV6-IP":110 disconnected: Connection closed: Connection reset by peer (state=0):
On 20/12/2011, at 9:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> […]
>> and libtextcat is dovecot 2.1.rc1 intended to be used against?
>
> http://www.let.rug.nl/vannoord/TextCat/ probably.. Basically I've just
> used the libstemmer and libtextcat that are in Debian.
Hmm. That seems to be been turned into libt
On 09/01/12 10:41, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 09.01.2012 10:37, schrieb Simon Loewenthal:
>> On 09/01/12 10:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Am 09.01.2012 10:16, schrieb J4K:
Morning everyone,
On the 8th of Jan the TLS/SSL certificate I use with Dovecot expired. I
replaced
Am 09.01.2012 10:37, schrieb Simon Loewenthal:
> On 09/01/12 10:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 10:16, schrieb J4K:
>>> Morning everyone,
>>>
>>> On the 8th of Jan the TLS/SSL certificate I use with Dovecot expired. I
>>> replaced it with a new on the 9th of Jan. I tested this wi
On 09/01/12 10:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 09.01.2012 10:16, schrieb J4K:
>> Morning everyone,
>>
>> On the 8th of Jan the TLS/SSL certificate I use with Dovecot expired. I
>> replaced it with a new on the 9th of Jan. I tested this with
>> Thunderbird and all is well.
>>
>> This morning
Am 09.01.2012 10:16, schrieb J4K:
> Morning everyone,
>
> On the 8th of Jan the TLS/SSL certificate I use with Dovecot expired. I
> replaced it with a new on the 9th of Jan. I tested this with
> Thunderbird and all is well.
>
> This morning people tell me they cannot get their email using
Morning everyone,
On the 8th of Jan the TLS/SSL certificate I use with Dovecot expired. I
replaced it with a new on the 9th of Jan. I tested this with
Thunderbird and all is well.
This morning people tell me they cannot get their email using their
mobile telephones : K9 Mail
I have re
62 matches
Mail list logo
