Re: [Dovecot] imap process limits problem

2011-12-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 12/30/2011 7:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Just out of curiosity, have you tried the non > one-login-process-per-connection setup? > > login_process_size = 64 > login_process_per_connection = yes Correction. This should be 'no' ^^^ > login_processes_count = 3 > login_max_processes_count = 1

Re: [Dovecot] fts_solr break-imap-search 2.1

2011-12-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 31.12.2011, at 22.28, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Is "break-imap-search" still required using 2.1 with Solr to index TEXT & > BODY searches? No. It's enabled always.

[Dovecot] fts_solr break-imap-search 2.1

2011-12-31 Thread Daniel L. Miller
Is "break-imap-search" still required using 2.1 with Solr to index TEXT & BODY searches? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] imap process limits problem

2011-12-31 Thread Charles Marcus
I think Stan already pointed you to where your problem most likely lies, but just wanted to point out that this: On 2011-12-30 1:53 PM, Calvin Cochran wrote: Most of our clients, including this one, use SSL or TLS and connect on 993. I believe is incorrect. Port 993 is for IMAP over SSL, if

Re: [Dovecot] OT Re: crashes on 2.0.16

2011-12-31 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:20:53 + Ed W articulated: > On 22/12/2011 11:13, Charles Marcus wrote: > > On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton > > wrote: > >> It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by > >> each distro. I don't know who would have the least, but I suspect > >

Re: [Dovecot] OT Re: crashes on 2.0.16

2011-12-31 Thread Pascal Volk
On 12/31/2011 02:20 PM Ed W wrote: > > Wait... Back up... You mean there are *other* distributions of linux? I > thought they were all just gentoo derivatives..?!! > > :-) Huh, I thought everything would be based on LFS [http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/]. Happy new year to the all Dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] OT Re: crashes on 2.0.16

2011-12-31 Thread Ed W
On 22/12/2011 11:13, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by each distro. I don't know who would have the least, but I suspect gentoo and centos would be out in front, Been using gentoo since about 2