On 20/12/2011 05:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.12.2011, at 19.35, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I wonder if anyone has tried using an IMAP server with Amazon S3 as a backend.
There would be many factors to consider (speed, etc). However, moreso, I
don't know that Maildir(++) would support multi
On 23/12/2011 19:20, sottile...@rfx.it wrote:
New box (supposed): CentOS 6.x (32/64 bit ? ), dovecot 2.04, mbox format
Any hints/comment appreciated ;-)
Don't use Dovecot 2.0.4, even if your distro tries to tempt you into
doing so by including such a version.
Whilst it looks like a stable
On 24/12/2011 10:31, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With mbox storage, an IMAP FOLDER contains only sub folders or it contains only
messages. It CANNOT contain BOTH.
Dovecot can store both folders and messages in a folder, under mbox.
See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders
Bill
On 12/29/2011 2:02 PM, David Pottage wrote:
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting David Pottage:
Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
based email client allows me to change the po
On 12/29/2011 2:02 PM, David Pottage wrote:
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting David Pottage:
Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
based email client allows me to change the po
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
>
> Quoting David Pottage :
>> Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
>> my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
>> based email client allows me to change the port number of an existing
>> email a
On 28/12/11 22:12, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It's a smart phone. Have you considering simply running a webmail server?
I considered it for about 10 seconds.
Webmail is much less efficent than IMAP both for the server and the
client. I run SquirrelMail on (on Apache) my server, and it consumes far
mo
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:49:57PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>
> >> With mdbox the internal separator is '/', but it's not valid to have
> >> "INBOX." prefix then (it should be "INBOX/").
> >
> > But how should this be handled in the migration phase from maildir to
> > mdbox then? Can we ha
Hi,
On 12/29/2011 01:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely
launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command
for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use these
features, so
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.12.2011, at 20.31, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Hi Dovecot peeps,
I'm enjoying running /usr/lib/dovecot/imap directly as a PREAUTH IMAP pipe.
I find that it outputs log messages whose severity is INFO to stdout. I'm
running it as follows:
/u
Hello,
I'm using proxy_maybe and auth_default_realm. It seems that when a user
logs in without the domain name, relying on auth_default_realm, and the
"host" field points to the local server, I get the Proxying loops to
itself error. It does work as expected - log on to the local server
witho
OK, thank you very much for this wonderful application.
--asai
On 12/29/2011 6:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.12.2011, at 17.46, Asai wrote:
I'm getting this error in the dsync logs:
Warning: Destination mailbox INBOX has been modified, need to recreate it
before we can continue syncing
On 12/29/2011 01:53 PM Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen :
>> …
>> a) Use "doveadm dsync" prefix, and otherwise keep the names same:
>>
>> dsync mirror -> doveadm dsync mirror
>> dsync backup -> doveadm dsync backup
>> dsync server -> doveadm dsync server (for running dsync remotely via
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > Can't I trust that no mails with timestamp before I enabled compression
> > are uncompressed? Or will dovecot compress old messages keeping old
> > timestamp when copying messages between folders, or something like that?
>
> I
On 29.12.2011, at 15.42, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:10:20PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> With mdbox the internal separator is '/', but it's not valid to have
>> "INBOX." prefix then (it should be "INBOX/").
>
> But how should this be handled in the migration ph
On 29.12.2011, at 15.36, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>>
>>> I.e. find all maildir-files:
>>>
>>> - with size in the name ("*,S=*")
>>> - modified before I enabled zlib plugin
>>
>> As long as it doesn't find any already co
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:10:20PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> With mdbox the internal separator is '/', but it's not valid to have "INBOX."
> prefix then (it should be "INBOX/").
But how should this be handled in the migration phase from maildir to
mdbox then? Can we have different namespac
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > I.e. find all maildir-files:
> >
> > - with size in the name ("*,S=*")
> > - modified before I enabled zlib plugin
>
> As long as it doesn't find any already compressed mails..
Can't I trust that no mails with timest
On 22.12.2011, at 3.52, David Jonas wrote:
> I'm in the process of migrating a large number of maildirs to a 3rd
> party dovecot server (from a dovecot server). Tests have shown that
> using imap to sync the accounts doesn't preserve the uidl for pop3 access.
>
> My current attempt is to convert
On 23.12.2011, at 0.21, Brian L. Matthews wrote:
> I just upgrade from dovecot 1.2 to dovecot 2.0.16. I use dovecot as a local
> IMAP server to archive email from my corporate email account (on Exchange). I
> don't have any automated archiving, I just periodically move messages from my
> Exchan
On 23.12.2011, at 1.10, Mike Abbott wrote:
> How do I configure dovecot-2.0.x to present a client SSL certificate when
> proxying?
Set ssl_client_cert and ssl_client_key settings in dovecot.conf. Requires hg
version, since these were added after v2.0.16.
> If dovecot on server1.example.com has
On 23.12.2011, at 9.10, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> For a single server, is the Lucene backend now "better" than running a Solr
> server?
Simpler, at least. Probably not better, since Solr uses a newer Lucene engine.
On 24.12.2011, at 1.44, David Jonas wrote:
> It appears that using dovecot to proxy to nginx imap proxy doesn't work.
> From tcpdump and browsing the source it appears dovecot sends,
>
> C CAPABILITY\r\nL LOGIN \r\n
>
> and nginx only responds to the CAPABILITY command. Is this a problem
> with
On 26.12.2011, at 9.48, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 12:43 AM, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
>> I tried to create folder named like 'Old Mail' (and in fact I got
>> another mbox container), while I needed to create 'Old Mail/' (note the
>> slash), which results in real filesystem directory.
>
On 27.12.2011, at 17.46, Asai wrote:
> I'm getting this error in the dsync logs:
>
> Warning: Destination mailbox INBOX has been modified, need to recreate it
> before we can continue syncing
> dsync(f...@bar.org): Error: Can't delete mailbox INBOX: INBOX can't be
> deleted.
>
> In this situat
On 29.12.2011, at 13.14, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Guess I don't quite get namespaces, but we have the following namespace
> configured:
>
> $ doveconf namespace
> namespace {
> hidden = no
> inbox = yes
> list = yes
> locatio
On 28.12.2011, at 0.58, sottile...@rfx.it wrote:
> How can be sure of the current POP3 UIDL?
If it's not visible, it's the default. Check with:
dovecot -a | grep pop3_uidl_format
On 29.12.2011, at 14.07, Charles Marcus wrote:
> It would be cool if the concept of 'Master User' could be expanded on to
> provide access to only certain other accounts, as opposed to full domains (or
> maybe it does alreaqdy and I just don't understand it well enough yet).
>
> For example, we
On 12/29/2011 2:49 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:56:33PM -0800, Dovecot-GDH wrote:
>> The cleanest (though not necessarily simplest) way to go about this would be
>> to use dsync to create a new maildir and incrementally direct traffic to a
>> separate Dovecot instan
On 24.12.2011, at 17.20, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> I've just enabled zlib for our users, and am looking at how to compress
> the existing files. The routine for doing this at
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib seems a bit complicated. What do
> you think about simply doing:
>
> find
* Timo Sirainen :
> doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely
> launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command
> for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use
> these features, so I merged dsync and dovead
On 28.12.2011, at 20.31, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Hi Dovecot peeps,
>
> I'm enjoying running /usr/lib/dovecot/imap directly as a PREAUTH IMAP pipe.
>
> I find that it outputs log messages whose severity is INFO to stdout. I'm
> running it as follows:
>
> /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -c /tmp/dove
On Qui, 2011-12-29 at 12:06 +0800, Dongyu.Zhen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> When I modify the dovecot imap source ,in "src/imap/" dir, I meet the
> Error below:
> Error: child (imap) kill (core dump disabled).
>
> In fact, I want to record the imap operation through dovecot. So, I
> modify every so
doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely
launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command
for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use these
features, so I merged dsync and doveadm into same binary for v2.
On 29.12.2011, at 6.06, Dongyu.Zhen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> When I modify the dovecot imap source ,in "src/imap/" dir, I meet the
> Error below:
> Error: child (imap) kill (core dump disabled).
Most likely due to your modification, but gdb backtraces are helpful when
debugging crashes: http:
On 2011-12-28 11:06 PM, Dongyu.Zhen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> When I modify the dovecot imap source ,in "src/imap/" dir, I meet the
> Error below:
> Error: child (imap) kill (core dump disabled).
>
> In fact, I want to record the imap operation through dovecot. So, I
> modify every source file
On 2011-12-28 5:05 PM, David Pottage wrote:
Secondly creating a second account makes the authentication on the
server a lot more complex. Either I need two OS level accounts on
the sever, and find ways to keep them in sync, or I need to create a
custom authentication method on dovecot or PAM so
Guess I don't quite get namespaces, but we have the following namespace
configured:
$ doveconf namespace
namespace {
hidden = no
inbox = yes
list = yes
location =
prefix = INBOX.
separa
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:56:33PM -0800, Dovecot-GDH wrote:
> The cleanest (though not necessarily simplest) way to go about this would be
> to use dsync to create a new maildir and incrementally direct traffic to a
> separate Dovecot instance.
>
> Unless you have a legacy application that reli
39 matches
Mail list logo
