Hi, I'm new in this List, but I have 6 years using
Dovecot on my debian from etch,lenny and now squeeze
Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 1:1.2.15-4
Tags: squeeze
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linu
Am Donnerstag, 17. November 2011, 22:30:07 schrieb Andy Robbins:
> We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot
> system which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot
> files. The confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than
> reads on our Dovecot volu
Do you have more than one Dovecot server? If only one, you can still disable
the mail_nfs_* settings. Also it would be interesting to see nfsstat numbers
from the Dovecot server, compared to those iostat numbers..
On 18.11.2011, at 0.38, Andy Robbins wrote:
> Well, the iostat command was run fr
Well, the iostat command was run from the NFS server and dovecot was run
from the mail server where it is mounted, hence the discrepancy there.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.11.2011, at 0.20, Andy Robbins wrote:
>
> > # iostat -d 5 -x
> > Device: rrqm/s
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:30:07PM -0600, Andy Robbins wrote:
> We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system
> which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The
> confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot
> volume w
On 18.11.2011, at 0.20, Andy Robbins wrote:
> # iostat -d 5 -x
> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz
> avgqu-sz await svctm %util
> dm-4 0.00 0.00 485.80 865.80 3886.40 6926.40
> 8.0028.69 19.63 0.70 94.00
> drbd0
# dovecot -n
# 1.2.9: //etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 x86_64 CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log
protocols: imap pop3
ssl_cert_file: /etc/postfix/ssl/smtp1.domain.com.cert
ssl_key_file: /etc/postfix/ssl/smtp1.domain.com.key
disable
On 17.11.2011, at 23.30, Andy Robbins wrote:
> We can't figure out why we would be seeing twice as many writes as we are
> reads. Could this have something to do with the index files?
dovecot -n output would be helpful.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:24 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:24 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > When a user renames their username, I am using dsync to copy their mail
> > over to the new username's mail location[0].
> >
> > Some of the dsyncs are failing with errors that
We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system
which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The
confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot
volume when you would assume that most of the IO should be reads from
customer
Hello Timo and Urban, and thank you for the very quick reply
I have already thought about these things: I have already disabled
mailbox deletion from POP3 clients, that actually just leave the
messages on the server
however, this time noone of the 4 recipients got the email - so it is
rea
On 16.11.2011 19:02, wroteTimo Sirainen:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:08 +0100, e-frog wrote:
On 06.11.2011 17:03, wrote e-frog:
1 lsub "" "virtual/*"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual/Lists"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual/unread"
1 OK Lsub completed.
Just tested this again with 2.1beta1 wit
[]'sf.rique
How many servers have access to your maildir on ext4 so that you could
> switch from ocfs2 to ext4?
> I use ocfs2 in my test environment for four servers (2 MX and 2 IMAP)
I used have 3 serves one mailman and 2 imaps.I experence that if take
my loadbalancer and takes it all to j
On 17.11.2011, at 18.47, Marco Carcano wrote:
>>> Oct 27 11:20:34 srv001 dovecot: lda(user3):
>>> msgid=>>> : saved mail to INBOX
>>
>> If Dovecot logs this, then the message definitely was saved to INBOX.
>
> it is exactly what I told to my colleagues, but belive me, sometime some mail
> get
Hi,
On 17.11.2011 17:47, Marco Carcano wrote:
Hello Timo, and thanks for your reply
I waited to reply until got it another time
as I already said, it does not happen very often, for example it happened on 12
november - the log is at the end of this mail
Enable mail_log plugin to make sure
Hello Timo, and thanks for your reply
I waited to reply until got it another time
as I already said, it does not happen very often, for example it
happened on 12 november - the log is at the end of this mail
Enable mail_log plugin to make sure of this.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Mail
Thanks so much for that have tested in 2.0.16 release now and is working fine.
Mark
From: Timo Sirainen [t...@iki.fi]
Sent: 16 November 2011 18:25
To: Mark Zealey
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Port variable in LMTP userdb lookups?
On Mon,
On 11/15/2011 1:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 12:26 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> This is why I recommended mbox in the first place. If your only writes
>> to these mailbox files are appends of new messages, mbox is the best
>> format by far. It's faster at appending tha
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:29PM -0200, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
> Wich clustered filesytem do you have?
We use IBM GPFS, with currently 7 servers working against shared LUNs
from an IBM DS4800.
>
> My ocfs2 setup had some problems... but still..
> Some numbers:
>
> OCFS2
> 1TB of
19 matches
Mail list logo
