On 17 October 2011 12:10, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
> Take a look at:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/file/962df5d9413a/src/auth/auth-request.c
>
> on line 536. That's the auth service catching illegal characters and
> rejecting the attempt. It'll happen with or without a valid user. So,
> workin
Take a look at:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/file/962df5d9413a/src/auth/auth-request.c
on line 536. That's the auth service catching illegal characters and
rejecting the attempt. It'll happen with or without a valid user. So,
working as it should.
As for spammers trying to brute force val
Am 17.10.2011 17:51, schrieb Simon Brereton:
> On 17 October 2011 11:31, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 17.10.2011 17:16, schrieb Simon Brereton:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL
>>> Auth to inject spam. None of the users they are trying (n
On 17 October 2011 11:31, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 17.10.2011 17:16, schrieb Simon Brereton:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL
>> Auth to inject spam. None of the users they are trying (newsletter, dummy,
>> test, etc.) exist, but what wo
Am 17.10.2011 17:16, schrieb Simon Brereton:
> Hi
>
> This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL
> Auth to inject spam. None of the users they are trying (newsletter, dummy,
> test, etc.) exist, but what worries me is the illegal chars error - is this a
> known v
Hi
This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL Auth
to inject spam. None of the users they are trying (newsletter, dummy, test,
etc.) exist, but what worries me is the illegal chars error - is this a known
vulnerability in dovecot they are trying to exploit? I'm
On Lunes 17 Octubre 2011 16:31:01 Juan Carlos Sanchez escribió:
> A particular reply (not to the list) has told me to try:
>
> "
> Add to service lmtp:
> process_min_avail = 20
> "
>
> And yes, it works (unless for me), so I want to share it with everybody.
>
> Have not exactly measured performa
A particular reply (not to the list) has told me to try:
"
Add to service lmtp:
process_min_avail = 20
"
And yes, it works (unless for me), so I want to share it with everybody.
Have not exactly measured performance but this morning have seen over
1400 messages/minute with lmtp under heavy loa
Dovecot2 has been around for a bit now but Eugene Paskevich's antispam
plugin unfortunately still doesn't seem to have a tagged release.
Has anyone by any chance rolled a .deb for the plugin that works on
current Debian sid?
--
Philipp Haselwarter
Hi,
Is it posible to use variables in mail_location when taken from ldap? How?
I've tried
mdbox:/buzones2/'%n'/mdbox
mdbox:/buzones2/"%n"/mdbox
mdbox:/buzones2/%n/mdbox
but %n is never replaced by its value.
Thanks!
--
Joseba Torre. Vicegerencia de TICs, área de Explotación
Hello:
In the process of migration from version 1.2 to 2.0 have tried to use
lmtp instead of lda as delivery agent.
But unfortunately througput we get is poor with lmtp compared to lda.
In peak times with lda we are able to deliver over 1800 messages/minute
(high I/O but not affecting service
Hello. I configured SIS , and all seems to work well, but I noticed
something strange :
For exemple, this attachement :
6e/2d# ls -al 6e2df299* | sort -n
104 instance of -rw--- 104 vmail vmail 346584 16 oct. 17:47
6e2df299fa96daec9b4735d07c494046429be4d6-ffd0d1
The files are hardli
12 matches
Mail list logo
