Re: [Dovecot] error in logs, but system appears to work

2011-09-06 Thread Joseph Tam
Chris Hoogendyk writes: So, looking at my other system that has been running dovecot for over a year, I see that the entries are mostly 0600, but there are a few 0660. The system I was just implementing has mostly 0660, but some 0600. We had seen occasional similar errors on the other system.

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas not recalculating

2011-09-06 Thread Kyle Brantley
On 9/6/2011 2:17 PM, Tobias Hachmer wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:08:37 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.9.2011, at 23.01, Tobias Hachmer wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:39 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.9.2011, at 4.28, Kyle Brantley wrote: Okay, something else isn't cooperating with this

Re: [Dovecot] dumb Q: how to search for email hack attempts ?

2011-09-06 Thread Rick Romero
Quoting Voytek : one of the users thinks someone hacked his email, I don't have time this morning to analyze mail logs in detail, but does some one has some tips to simply searching mail logs for multiple log in attempts, etc, I'd appreciate some grepping for failed logins show give some clues

[Dovecot] dumb Q: how to search for email hack attempts ?

2011-09-06 Thread Voytek
one of the users thinks someone hacked his email, I don't have time this morning to analyze mail logs in detail, but does some one has some tips to simply searching mail logs for multiple log in attempts, etc, I'd appreciate some grepping for failed logins show give some clues ?

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas not recalculating

2011-09-06 Thread Tobias Hachmer
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:08:37 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.9.2011, at 23.01, Tobias Hachmer wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:39 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.9.2011, at 4.28, Kyle Brantley wrote: Okay, something else isn't cooperating with this at all. I reconfigured it to use dirsize ju

Re: [Dovecot] error in logs, but system appears to work

2011-09-06 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 6.9.2011, at 23.09, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > > > On 9/6/11 3:51 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 6.9.2011, at 22.35, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: >> >>> -rw-rw 1 ebradley mail 9484323 Sep 6 15:16 /var/mail/ebradley >> Is there any reason for this to be 0660? Most likely not, so your probl

Re: [Dovecot] error in logs, but system appears to work

2011-09-06 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
On 9/6/11 3:51 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.9.2011, at 22.35, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: -rw-rw 1 ebradley mail 9484323 Sep 6 15:16 /var/mail/ebradley Is there any reason for this to be 0660? Most likely not, so your problem goes away simply with chmod 0600 /var/mail/* and at the sa

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas not recalculating

2011-09-06 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 6.9.2011, at 23.01, Tobias Hachmer wrote: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:39 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 5.9.2011, at 4.28, Kyle Brantley wrote: >> >>> Okay, something else isn't cooperating with this at all. I reconfigured it >>> to use dirsize just to test (quota = dirsize:User quota in 90

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas not recalculating

2011-09-06 Thread Tobias Hachmer
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:39 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.9.2011, at 4.28, Kyle Brantley wrote: Okay, something else isn't cooperating with this at all. I reconfigured it to use dirsize just to test (quota = dirsize:User quota in 90-quota.conf instead of quota = maildir:User quota), and it

Re: [Dovecot] error in logs, but system appears to work

2011-09-06 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 6.9.2011, at 22.35, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > -rw-rw 1 ebradley mail 9484323 Sep 6 15:16 /var/mail/ebradley Is there any reason for this to be 0660? Most likely not, so your problem goes away simply with chmod 0600 /var/mail/* and at the same time makes your system more secure.

[Dovecot] error in logs, but system appears to work

2011-09-06 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
I'm bringing up a system with dovecot that has been running for years with uw-imap. In making the switch, I put a tail on the log file, made the switch, and sent a test mail and received it. I was able to receive mail with no apparent difficulties, but the log file was disconcerting. A number of

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve "header :value" test does not work

2011-09-06 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 06/09/11 21:11, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > hi, > > After following some examples and searching for sieve samples in this ml > history, I'm quite sure that the following sieve snippet should give no > surprises: > > if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" "X-Header-Name" > "0.99" { /* do

[Dovecot] Sieve "header :value" test does not work

2011-09-06 Thread Tom Hendrikx
hi, After following some examples and searching for sieve samples in this ml history, I'm quite sure that the following sieve snippet should give no surprises: if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" "X-Header-Name" "0.99" { /* do something */ } However the Pigeonhole Sieve 0.2.3 on

[Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

2011-09-06 Thread mailing lists
Hello, I spend a couple of days configurating a new installation of dovecot 2.0.14 with virtual accounts and NFS storage for maildir home/mail directories. At this point I need shared mailboxes but since user mail/home locations are ldap attributes, how is it supposed I must configure this for