On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:45 +0100, Tom Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping you'll be able to help. I'm working on a project to migrate our
> users from a courier-imap (4.3.0) based mail server to a dovecot (2.0.8)
> mail server.
>
> I have got all the users migrated and working. However, I can't se
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 12:07 +0430, Meisam Navaki wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm reading dovecot source codes(2.0.13),and I need to know how dovecot
> communicate with sasl?
For what purpose? Dovecot's login process communicates with auth process
via http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Design/AuthProtocol
> I traced
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:23 +0200, Peter Mogensen wrote:
> >> I can see that a lookup in the userdb is done, but now matter what I
> >> return (1/111) from my checkpassword script I just get:
> >
> > Set lmtp_proxy=yes and have passdb lookup return proxy=y and
> > host=1.2.3.4.
>
> But how does t
Try to apply these patches to both proxy and backend and see what it
logs then?
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/raw-rev/1b1fc681a277
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/raw-rev/36e7ded2ef0b
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/raw-rev/537d4b6d9a7a
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 08:38 +, Innocenzi, Cinzia
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:23:45 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2011 5:01 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hello folks
hello Timo
I am facing a new problem
I'm using dovecot LDA to deliver the emails
now root of the system emails are delivered in the box to the letter
of the
postfix
directo
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:49 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> If I do that the denying does not work , I'we written my login in
>
> /usr/local/etc/dovecot/deny-users and I am still able to log in ( after
> restarting dovecot of course )
> see attached the dovecot -n output
There is no deny passdb in
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:01 +, Maria Arrea wrote:
> Any other idea about this? Maybe this problem is load-related?
All I can really say is that: This just shouldn't be happening, ever. If
there's a way to reproduce it I would be interested in knowing how. I
know there are other mdbox users w
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:08 -0400, i...@tnde.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 03:58 -0400, i...@tnde.org wrote:
> >> I am running dovecot 2.0.13 on CentOS5, set up with only local system
> >> users, and single instance store set up in a single directory.
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >> mail_attachment_dir
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:19 +0200, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have in my system dovecot 1.2.11 and i want migrate to dovecot 2.0.13.
> I have 2 Frontend that proxy all request to Backend and i want migrate
> first FE and after the BE.
>
> Can i install dovecot 2.0.13 in FE that proxy all
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 21:38 +0400, Sergey Urushkin wrote:
>
> 29279 received: COOKIE cf735efce15b21bbb10568c4a762017c
> 29279 SMTP>> 435 Unable to authenticate at present
I guess Exim gets confused by the COOKIE that is sent to it. It should
just ignore it, but it fails. Since this COOKIE is im
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:19 +0430, Meisam Navaki wrote:
> dovecot: master: Error: service(config): child 8606 killed with signal 11
> (core dumps disabled)
config process crashes for some reason. Can you get a gdb backtrace? You
should be able to do it simply by:
ulimit -c unlimited
dovecot
gdb
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:02 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote:
> home=/var/mail/virtual/mediaservice.pri/testqu...@mediaservice.pri/
> Jun 29 17:42:19 lda(testqu...@mediaservice.pri): Debug: Quota root:
> name=User quota backend=maildir args=
> Jun 29 17:42:19 lda(testqu...@mediaservice.pri): Debug: Quota
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:14 +0200, Denny Schierz wrote:
> is there a way, to let Dovecot2 uses the base64 encoded passwords from a
> ldapsearch output, without decode them first?
Plaintext passwords? Add "{plain.base64}" prefix to them.
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:54 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
> I recently tried to look at the Dovecot mailing lists through an
> already-configured IMAP profile, which had worked fine in the past.
Yeah, it was broken in two ways. Should be working in a few minutes,
hopefully :)
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:09 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
> On 29/06/2011 18:00, William Blunn wrote:
> > Perhaps the per-mailbox index files for sdbox and mdbox should be
> > re-named to "message metadata databases", and the "map index" should
> > be renamed to "message store database".
>
> Also
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 00:31 +0300, Mikko Lehto wrote:
> I am about to run a setup where users are virtual and their mail is owned by
> vmail user. I bumped into minor client issue and needed to enable rawlogging
> according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog
>
> This is what was printed
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:40 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Since maildir is IOPS heavy and NFS/GFS/OCFS don't seem to like high
> IOPS workloads that make heavy use of locking, mbox becomes very
> attractive due to it's very low IOPS demands. If you can live with the
> folder tree limitations of m
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:10 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable,
> doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they
> necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency
> and improve performance?
>
> My u
Hi,
I'm hoping you'll be able to help. I'm working on a project to migrate our
users from a courier-imap (4.3.0) based mail server to a dovecot (2.0.8)
mail server.
I have got all the users migrated and working. However, I can't see how to
migrate the shared folders from courier-imap. I have trie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:40 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Since maildir is IOPS heavy and NFS/GFS/OCFS don't seem to like high
> IOPS workloads that make heavy use of locking, mbox becomes very
> attractive due to it's very low IOPS demands. If you can live with the
> folder tree limitations of
On 6/29/2011 1:10 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable,
> doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they
> necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency
> and improve performance?
>
> My understanding is
On 6/29/2011 5:01 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> hello folks
> hello Timo
>
>
> I am facing a new problem
> I'm using dovecot LDA to deliver the emails
> now root of the system emails are delivered in the box to the letter of the
> postfix
> directory /vap/spool/postfix
>
> I do not know
Shazia Javed writes:
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready.
...
telnet mail.ut.ee 143
Trying 193.40.5.156...
Connected to mailhost.ut.ee.
Escape character is
Hi, this is my first post to the list after years of passive following
every now and then.
Dovecot: 2.0.13 (3d07ab746a67) prebuilt binaries from xi.rename-it.nl
OS: i686 Debian 6.0 squeeze/sid
I am about to run a setup where users are virtual and their mail is owned by
vmail user. I bumped into m
hello folks
hello Timo
I am facing a new problem
I'm using dovecot LDA to deliver the emails
now root of the system emails are delivered in the box to the letter of the
postfix
directory /vap/spool/postfix
I do not know what to do to redirect mail from root to root
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11
The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable,
doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they
necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency
and improve performance?
My understanding is the indexes are a critical part of a dbox storage,
bu
I think we all know who the troll is here
Yup. Me!
**.:\:/:.
.:\:\:/:/:.
:.:\:\:/:/:.:
:=.' - - '.=:
'=(\ 9 9 /)='
( (_) )
/`-vvv-'\
/ \
/ /|,|\ \
/_// /^\ \\_\
WW( ( ) )WW
On 29/06/2011 18:00, William Blunn wrote:
Perhaps the per-mailbox index files for sdbox and mdbox should be
re-named to "message metadata databases", and the "map index" should
be renamed to "message store database".
Also it might be an idea to change the filenames of the files to avoid
the w
In fact, under sdbox and mdbox, calling these files "index files" is
misleading because it implies that they can be re-created, leading to
situations like this.
Such situations could result in catastrophic data loss. Whilst we could
say it is "user error", users could argue that it is "common
On 28/06/2011 17:13, Davide Vaghetti wrote:
I have one thousand virtual users with mdbox mailbox format and 10 GByte quota.
I have noticed some performance problem related to I/O (the mailbox disk is a
6TB raid1+0 on ISCSI), so I want to put the index files on a different disk. My
actual mail_
On 29/06/2011 13:19, Shazia Javed wrote:
---
Objective:
---
We need to download emails from remote server using Dovecot and thunderbird.
Dovecot doesn't download e-mail from other servers.
Our objective is to store emails in maildir or mbox form
Hello all,
I have some troubles to make the quota_check working with dovecot 2.0.
My config is the following: postfix, dovecot as lda, mysql as virtual
mailuser backend, and postfixadmin for the mailuser administration.
Previously i have a working setup with dovecot 1.x, now with the 2.0
somethi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/28/2011 07:29 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-06-28 12:13 PM, Davide Vaghetti wrote:
>> mail_location = mdbox:/var/vmail/%-1.1u/%u/mdbox
>>
>> and I want to switch to
>>
>> mail_location =
>> mdbox:/var/vmail/%-1.1u/%u/mdbox:INDEX=/var/ind
On 6/29/2011 7:19 AM, Shazia Javed wrote:
> As is obvious from the commands and output listed above that dovecot is
> running, listening on 110 and 143 - but only for localhost. When I try to
> telnet mail.ut.ee 110/143 I get to see IMAP4/POP3 ready rather than
> Dovecot ready.
It seems obvious t
Hi,
What makes you think that e-mail retrieval from remote servers should
be over Dovecot?
Is 193.40.5.156 running Dovecot that it should say "Dovecot ready." ?
I think what you need fetchmail or getmail. Dovecot is a MTA, not a MRA.
Best,
Kerem
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Shazia Javed
Am Dienstag, den 28.06.2011, 11:54 +0100 schrieb William Blunn:
>
> Any ideas?
I guess its not working at the moment.
CAPABILITY says LOGINDISABLED and AUTH=ANONYMOUS.
If the client does not support this auth method, authentication is
denied because login is disabled and starttls or ssl to get
Dovecot Version:
2.0.13
Output of "dovecot -n":
# 2.0.13: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 10.10 ext4
mail_location = maildir:/home/%u/Maildir
passdb {
hi,
is there a way, to let Dovecot2 uses the base64 encoded passwords from a
ldapsearch output, without decode them first?
cu denny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Fallbacking to another LDAP server is done by OpenLDAP internally. So
what would be needed is either a) OpenLDAP to itself figure out that
queries are running too slowly and see if another server is faster, or
b) Dovecot figure that out itself and force OpenLDAP to switch to
another server.
39 matches
Mail list logo
