[Dovecot] Outlook double attachments

2011-04-18 Thread Ladislav PaĊĦek
Hello, does anybody have experience with delivery of double attachments into Outlook? I suppose that this would be a problem of Outlook 2010 but to be sure I'd like to ask here as we are using Dovecot 2.0.11 Best Regards Ladislav

Re: [Dovecot] Question about Outlook workarounds

2011-04-18 Thread Peter Evans
> In any case, can anyone specifically state what workaround is required for MS > Outlook 2010? I won't have an opportunity until next week to actively try > different scenarios to see if any specific configurations must be adhered to > so if anyone has any factual knowledge on the subject I would

Re: [Dovecot] Question about Outlook workarounds

2011-04-18 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:45:31 -0400 Dave McGuire articulated: > On 4/18/11 4:42 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > >> Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current > >> versions of Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that > >> workarounds are no longer needed in Dovecot (and if s

Re: [Dovecot] Solaris hardware crypto engines

2011-04-18 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
The attachment made the message too long for the forum. So I canceled the original. If you want the Sun article, you can google 05071387.pdf. The original went through to Martin. On 4/18/11 5:02 PM, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: On 4/18/11 6:30 AM, Martin Preen wrote: Hello, I tried to find out how a

Re: [Dovecot] Question about Outlook workarounds

2011-04-18 Thread Dave McGuire
On 4/18/11 4:42 PM, Scott Silva wrote: Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current versions of Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that workarounds are no longer needed in Dovecot (and if so, after what version of Outlook can I remove the workaround settings in my

Re: [Dovecot] Question about Outlook workarounds

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Silva
on 4/18/2011 6:29 AM Michael Durket spake the following: > Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current versions of > Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that workarounds are no longer > needed in Dovecot (and if so, after what version of Outlook can I remove the > w

Re: [Dovecot] Solaris hardware crypto engines

2011-04-18 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Martin Preen put forth on 4/18/2011 5:30 AM: > Hello, > I tried to find out how about to use the hardware crypto engines under > Solaris (Sun Fire T2000). It seems, that its not just a compilation issue: > >> For operations that are to be offloaded, it is necessary to restrict >> use to subset >>

[Dovecot] Question about Outlook workarounds

2011-04-18 Thread Michael Durket
Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current versions of Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that workarounds are no longer needed in Dovecot (and if so, after what version of Outlook can I remove the workaround settings in my dovecot.conf file)?

[Dovecot] Solaris hardware crypto engines

2011-04-18 Thread Martin Preen
Hello, I tried to find out how about to use the hardware crypto engines under Solaris (Sun Fire T2000). It seems, that its not just a compilation issue: For operations that are to be offloaded, it is necessary to restrict use to subset > of OpenSSL functions (the EVP_ functions) and explicitly