Am 13.01.2011 23:17, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
>
> On 13/01/11 21:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:11 AM:
>>
>>> Would DRBD + GFS2 work better than NFS? While NFS is simple, I don't
>>> mind
>>> experimenting with DRBD and GFS2 is it means fewer problems?
>>
On 01/13/2011 09:01 PM, Ian B wrote:
Running Dovecot 2.0.8 on 32bit Centos5.5. The machine is a VMWare ESX VM.
I'm seeing a lot of warning messages in syslog as follows:
2011-01-14T11:45:37.315917+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time jumped
forwards 105 seconds
2011-01-14T11:46:00.598006+0
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
Linux kernel bonding, mode=4 (IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation).
I'm guessing that since you're using a cross over cable, by just
setting up the bond0 interfaces as usual (As per this article
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-bond-or-team-multiple-network-
Running Dovecot 2.0.8 on 32bit Centos5.5. The machine is a VMWare ESX VM.
I'm seeing a lot of warning messages in syslog as follows:
2011-01-14T11:45:37.315917+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time jumped
forwards 105 seconds
2011-01-14T11:46:00.598006+08:00 imap4 dovecot: imap: Warning: Time
On 14/01/11 03:26, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD
cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recommended.
On 14/01/11 03:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Henrique Fernandes :
for drbd you only need a heartbeat i guess.
Fencing is not needed for drbd, though recommended.
But to use gfs2 you need fence device, ocfs2 does not require once,
like the
ocfs2 driver takes care, it reboots if it thin
Quoting Henrique Fernandes :
for drbd you only need a heartbeat i guess.
Fencing is not needed for drbd, though recommended.
But to use gfs2 you need fence device, ocfs2 does not require once, like the
ocfs2 driver takes care, it reboots if it thinks it is desyncronized
gfs2 technically re
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recommended. That is what I do on all my clusters.
How
for drbd you only need a heartbeat i guess.
But to use gfs2 you need fence device, ocfs2 does not require once, like the
ocfs2 driver takes care, it reboots if it thinks it is desyncronized
[]'sf.rique
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
>
>> Does gfs2 guarantee integr
On 14.1.2011, at 1.02, Willie Gillespie wrote:
> Here's an easy question for you. I'm restoring some emails from a backup.
> Do I need to delete or otherwise manually rebuild the indexes?
No.
> Or will Dovecot itself detect that something is amiss and handle it on first
> folder access?
Yep
Does gfs2 guarantee integridy withou anm fency device ?
You make a fair point. Would I need any hardware fencing for DRBD (and
GFS2)?
Here's an easy question for you. I'm restoring some emails from a
backup. Do I need to delete or otherwise manually rebuild the indexes?
dovecot.index.cache
dovecot.index.log
dovecot-uidlist
Or will Dovecot itself detect that something is amiss and handle it on
first folder access?
Using M
As are you thinking, you will have 2 servers with drbd active/standby you
could teset both setups, exporting over NFS or over iscsi + gfs2
Does gfs2 guarantee integridy withou anm fency device ?
Where i work i guess we choose ocfs2 becasue of this litle problem, we could
not have an fenc device
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recommended. That is what I do on all my clusters.
How do you bond the connection
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
I'm hearing different things on whether dovecot works well or not with GFS2.
Dovecot works fine with GFS2. The question is performance of
Dovecot on GFS2. I do dovecot on GFS2 (with mbox instead of maildir)
and it works fine for my user load... Your userload may
Am 13.01.2011 19:42, schrieb Holger Mauermann:
> Am 13.01.2011 18:58, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 13.1.2011, at 19.20, Holger Mauermann wrote:
>>
>>> Renaming a mailbox that has children still doesn't work for me with
>>> v2.0.9 Any ideas?
>>
>> I can't reproduce. Show your dovecot -n output?
On 13/01/11 21:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:11 AM:
Would DRBD + GFS2 work better than NFS? While NFS is simple, I don't mind
experimenting with DRBD and GFS2 is it means fewer problems?
Depends on your definition of "better". If you do two dovecot+drbd
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:11 AM:
> Would DRBD + GFS2 work better than NFS? While NFS is simple, I don't mind
> experimenting with DRBD and GFS2 is it means fewer problems?
Depends on your definition of "better". If you do two dovecot+drbd nodes you
have only two nodes. If you d
Well, I just noticed this in my logs after I re-loaded the latest
Dovecot config I tried:
Jan 13 15:09:45 mail dovecot: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration
Jan 13 15:09:45 mail dovecot: read(imap dump-capability process) failed:
Interrupted system call
Jan 13 15:09:45 mail dovecot: Inval
After having removed imap_acl, the crash is gone.
On 13/01/2011 19:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2011, at 21.01, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>
>> Here is the info from the core file:
>
> That doesn't make much sense though.. Can you compile Dovecot without
> stripping debug symbols? Or you can
Quoting David Jonas :
I've been considering getting a pair of SSDs in raid1 for just the
dovecot indexes.
While raid-1 is better than the raid-0 of the previous poster, do you
really want to slow down your fast SDDs with software raid-1 on top of them?
The hope would be to minimize the impac
Recompiling the plugin didn't help.
It seems broken, but I have no idea why it stopped working...
On 13/01/2011 19:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2011, at 21.01, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>
>> Here is the info from the core file:
>
> That doesn't make much sense though.. Can you compile Dovecot
I may have found the problem...
# ldd /usr/lib/dovecot/lib90_antispam_plugin.so
/usr/lib/dovecot/lib90_antispam_plugin.so:
libdovecot.so.0 => not found (0x0)
libdovecot-storage.so.0 => not found (0x0)
I'll recompile to see what happens
On 13/01/2011 19:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
On 13/01/2011 19:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2011, at 21.01, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>
>> Here is the info from the core file:
>
> That doesn't make much sense though.. Can you compile Dovecot without
> stripping debug symbols? Or you can you easily reproduce this? Can you try if
> you
On 13.1.2011, at 21.01, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
> Here is the info from the core file:
That doesn't make much sense though.. Can you compile Dovecot without stripping
debug symbols? Or you can you easily reproduce this? Can you try if you can
crash without any plugins? It looks as the problem ha
* Mark Alan :
> > - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch
> > count performance problem
>
> Is this problem also present in Dovecot 1.2.xx ?
No.
> Regarding critical resources in shared (XEN) servers, like CPU or RAM
> usage, will v.2.0.9 use more (or less) resources th
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:17:20 +0100
> Von: "Miha Vrhovnik"
> An: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot]SSD drives are really fast running Dovecot
> >"As a sanity check - I found some data from Mtron (one of the few SSD
> oems who
> >do quot
On 13/01/2011 18:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2011, at 20.45, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I've just updated to 2.0.9 and I've got lots of these in the logs now.
>
> From 2.0.8?
>
Yes
>> Jan 13 18:57:13 master: Error: service(imap): child 40100 killed with
>> signal 11 (core n
On 13.1.2011, at 20.45, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
> Hello,
> I've just updated to 2.0.9 and I've got lots of these in the logs now.
From 2.0.8?
> Jan 13 18:57:13 master: Error: service(imap): child 40100 killed with
> signal 11 (core not dumped - set service imap { drop_priv_before_exec=yes })
>
>
Hello,
I've just updated to 2.0.9 and I've got lots of these in the logs now.
Jan 13 18:57:13 master: Error: service(imap): child 40100 killed with
signal 11 (core not dumped - set service imap { drop_priv_before_exec=yes })
Is there a configuration change or something else I should have done
whi
Am 13.01.2011 18:58, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 13.1.2011, at 19.20, Holger Mauermann wrote:
>
>> Renaming a mailbox that has children still doesn't work for me with
>> v2.0.9 Any ideas?
>
> I can't reproduce. Show your dovecot -n output?
Here it is:
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS
On 13.1.2011, at 19.22, Mark Alan wrote:
>> - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch
>> count performance problem
>
> Is this problem also present in Dovecot 1.2.xx ?
No.
> Regarding critical resources in shared (XEN) servers, like CPU or RAM
> usage, will v.2.0.9 use m
On 13.1.2011, at 19.37, Robert Brockway wrote:
> Hi Timo. Wear levelling often isn't as good as is claimed on the box. Often
> wear levelling is only across subsets of the SSD not across the entire device.
>
> I've seen several SSD drives fail in production after about 12 months of use,
> and
On 13.1.2011, at 19.20, Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Renaming a mailbox that has children still doesn't work for me with
> v2.0.9 Any ideas?
I can't reproduce. Show your dovecot -n output?
> Jan 13 17:48:15 dovecot dovecot: imap(u...@do.main): Error:
> rename(/var/spool/imap/do.main/user/Maild
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.1.2011, at 21.15, Matt wrote:
I thought about doing this on my email server since its troubles are
mostly disk I/O saturation but I was concerned about reliability.
Have heard that after so many read/writes SSD will go bad.
There's no need to w
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:21:26 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz
> I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release
> v2.0.9 anyway.
>
> - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch
> count performance pro
Am 13.01.2011 12:21, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release
> v2.0.9 anyway.
> ...
> - Maildir: Fixed renaming child mailboxes when namespace had a prefix.
Renaming a mailbox that has children still doesn't work for me with
v2.0.
El Thursday 13 January 2011, Timo Sirainen dijo:
> On 13.1.2011, at 18.12, Joseba Torre wrote:
> > in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration, the example script that
> > sends an email to the user uses the -o option to dovecot-lda that
> > doesn't exists.
>
> Yes it does.. Why do you think
On 13.1.2011, at 18.12, Joseba Torre wrote:
> in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration, the example script that
> sends
> an email to the user uses the -o option to dovecot-lda that doesn't exists.
Yes it does.. Why do you think it doesn't?
On 13.1.2011, at 14.36, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release
>> v2.0.9 anyway.
>>
>> - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch count
>>
Dear all,
I have postfix delivering to dovecot lda (via spamassinassin). I
have configured the quota plugin, but it does not seem to respect the
details in the quota table in mysql. The query I have used looks
correct to me, and the user can connect to the database.
I wonder if someone migh
Hi,
in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration, the example script that sends
an email to the user uses the -o option to dovecot-lda that doesn't exists.
HTH
--
Joseba Torre. Vicegerencia de TICs, área de Explotación
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:53 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I just replaced my drives for Dovecot using Maildir format with a pair
> of Solid State Drives (SSD) in a raid 0 configuration. It's really
> really fast. Kind of expensive but it's like getting 20x the speed for
> 20x the price. I think th
I've got a number of public mailboxes configured for my users. We pretty
much have to use Entourage for a client, which insists on creating all new
subfolders with the name 'Untitled Folder'. When they try to rename these
subfolders with useful names, Dovecot returns
A028 NO [CANNOT] Renaming not
Hi, I have a user called archive that gets a BCC of all incoming/outgoing
email. I would like to have the email in the new/cur directories setup to be
read only, is there a way to do this in dovecot 2.0.8. I know you can set
the umask in the dovecot config but I believe this is a global setting.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:51:50PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
>
> > when you are logged in to your box as user 'thomas', then thomas is the
> > logged in system user.
>
> Ah sorry, I had interpreted "logged in" as "logged in through
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> when you are logged in to your box as user 'thomas', then thomas is the
> logged in system user.
Ah sorry, I had interpreted "logged in" as "logged in through IMAP"...
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
| Pôle informatique
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery,
along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp
(afaik), only
ima
What's up!?
Well...
i'm using this packages:
dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5
quota.x86_64 1:3.13-1.2.5.el5
Squirrelmail
Postfix
MYSQL
Centos 5.5 64 Bits
I configured my dovecot.conf to leave the "TRASH" folder outside the "quota",
but without
success ...
H
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery, along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp (afaik), only
imap
On 01/13/2011 02:04 PM Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Silly question : what user is the "logged in system user" doveadm-expunge's
> man
> page refers to when describing its first form of use ?
>
when you are logged in to your box as user 'thomas', then thomas is the
logged in system user.
Hello,
Silly question : what user is the "logged in system user" doveadm-expunge's man
page refers to when describing its first form of use ?
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
| Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release
> v2.0.9 anyway.
>
> - Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch count
> performance problem
Is this relevant to RHEL5 kernels
I use ocfs2 with 3 dovecots. one only for mailman.
We have problens with IO. Have about 4k active users.
We are now testing more ocfs2 clusters, becasue one of yours theorys is that
iff all mail resides in only one ocfs2 cluster, it takes too long to find
the file. ocfs2 i guess does not support
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.9.tar.gz.sig
I'm still lagging behind in my email, but I guess it's time to release
v2.0.9 anyway.
- Linux: Fixed a high system CPU usage / high context switch count
performance prob
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:57:20AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp (afaik),
> only
> imap.
The director can do lmtp proxying, but I haven't seen much documentation
on it except the few lines at:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/
Miha Vrhovnik put forth on 1/13/2011 3:17 AM:
>> "As a sanity check - I found some data from Mtron (one of the few SSD oems
>> who
>> do quote endurance in a way that non specialists can understand). In the data
>> sheet for their 32G product - which incidentally has 5 million cycles write
>> endu
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
> Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery, along
> with
> Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp (afaik), only
imap. The reason for having Postfix use
These two directories should have "dovenull" as group.. It should have
automatically figured this out by looking up dovenull's group. I could send some debug
patches to figure out what the problem is.. But you should be able to work around it by
setting:
service imap-login {
group = doven
On 12.1.2011, at 13.34, Javier de Miguel Rodrí guez wrote:
> /Jan 12 12:14:44 buzon dovecot: imap-login: Error: auth: connect(login) in
> directory / failed: Permission denied (euid=107()
> egid=110() missing +x perm: /, euid is not dir owner)/
Hmm.
> ls -lhR /var/run/dovecot
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:10:54PM -0600, Romer Ventura wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot-bounces+rventura=h-st@dovecot.org
> [mailto:dovecot-bounces+rventura=h-st@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Simone
> Caruso
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:18 PM
> To: dovecot@dovecot
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:46:24PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Also, I'm not sure I correctly understand what "Use the default namespace for
> saving subscriptions." option is. Is it just the location of the subscription
> file for mailboxes subscribed in the shared namespace ? Where would it be
>"As a sanity check - I found some data from Mtron (one of the few SSD oems who
>do quote endurance in a way that non specialists can understand). In the data
>sheet for their 32G product - which incidentally has 5 million cycles write
>endurance - they quote the write endurance for the disk as "gr
Still no luck with this. I have followed the debuggind guidelines
of dovecot wiki (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/ProcessTracing) and
executed the following:
strace -f -tt -o strace_dovecot -p 15426
15426 is the PID os /usr/sbin/dovecot. I attach you compressed the
log of the s
Am 13.01.2011 08:22, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I wish to create a Postfix/Dovecot active-active cluster (each node will
> run Postfix *and* Dovecot), which will obviously have to use central
> storage. I'm looking for ideas to see what's the best out there. All of
> this will b
In this Xen setup, I think the best way to accomplish your goals is to create 6
guests:
2 x Linux Postfix
2 x Linux Dovecot
1 x Linux NFS server
1 x Linux Dovecot director
Each of these can be painfully small stripped down Linux instances. Configure
each Postfix and Dovecot server to access t
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 1:22 AM:
> I wish to create a Postfix/Dovecot active-active cluster (each node will run
> Postfix *and* Dovecot), which will obviously have to use central storage. I'm
> looking for ideas to see what's the best out there. All of this will be
> running
> on
67 matches
Mail list logo
