On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:42 -0500, Joan Moreau wrote:
> dsync[30214]: segfault at 0 ip
> 7f02990349eb sp 7fff56c2cc80 error 4 in
> libdovecot-storage.so.0.0.0[7f0299001000+d3000]
Get gdb backtrace.
ulimit -c unlimited
dsync ...
gdb dsync core
bt full
signature.asc
Description: This i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:53:37AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.1.2011, at 20.05, dove...@moorooboorai.com wrote:
>
> > One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is the
> > storage of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-tex
Am 04.01.2011 00:58, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> a) yeah, if you lost your private key or its password, they're lost
If users are aware of that, that will be ok.
> b) but you can change the private key's password
private key should be encrypted with users password. A "change password"
tool must cha
Ok, sorry, some bug on my side.
Now, when doing the sync for all
users, I get this every time:
dsync[30214]: segfault at 0 ip
7f02990349eb sp 7fff56c2cc80 error 4 in
libdovecot-storage.so.0.0.0[7f0299001000+d3000]
Any idea ?
On Mon, 3
Jan 2011 00:13:20 -0200, Henrique Fernandes wr
On 3.1.2011, at 20.49, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is the
>> storage of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-text.
>> Meaning, any administrator with sufficient privileges would be able to read
>> messages not meant for them.
>> Of c
On 3.1.2011, at 20.05, dove...@moorooboorai.com wrote:
> One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is the
> storage of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-text.
> Meaning, any administrator with sufficient privileges would be able to read
> messages not meant for them.
> Of
On 3.1.2011, at 19.15, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> I'm facing problem with mail group privileges (again), because I've heard a
> few complains. I was looking at old emails and list archives, but still does
> not know the answer. In default (fedora/rhel) setup mail group and 0660
> privileges are u
To store the messages safely/safeish, I think you will have to use
public key cypto. Messages delivered should be encrypted with the user's
public key on delivery, and decrypted by combination of the user's server
side stored secret key and login passphrase. The secret key probably also
would need
On Jan 3, 2011, at 10:05 AM, dove...@moorooboorai.com wrote:
Hi all,
One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is
the storage of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-text.
Meaning, any administrator with sufficient privileges would be able
to read messages not meant for
Hi all,
One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is the storage
of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-text.
Meaning, any administrator with sufficient privileges would be able to read
messages not meant for them.
Of course, PGP alike solutions exist, but that's not for the
Hi Timo,
I'm facing problem with mail group privileges (again), because I've heard a
few complains. I was looking at old emails and list archives, but still does
not know the answer. In default (fedora/rhel) setup mail group and 0660
privileges are used. This means that when
mail_location
Hi, recently I installed the newest 2.x version of dovecot working with
postfixadmin/mysql and it works great, thanks Timo, however I been reading
dovecot's mailing list archived messages and haven't run across a good
solution for archiving mail with dovecot. There was mention of using rsync
but I
On 12/30/2010 4:14 AM, Seasoul wrote:
When I send an email to us...@domain.com from a gmail account, this is the
log record:
postfix/qmgr[28610]: 4E2EA70324: from=, size=5119, nrcpt=1
(queue active)
postfix/virtual[2947]: 4E2EA70324: to=, relay=virtual,
delay=0.51, delays=0.44/0.02/0/0.05, dsn=
I am using period as an IMAP separator with Maildir directories and I
cannot share folders where the user has a period in their name.
Suppose I log in as 'some.user' and do:
SETACL INBOX mailt...@example.co.uk +lrwstipekxacd
/var/mail/virtual/users/some.user/Maildir/dovecot-acl is created, w
Never mind -- I see now that this is working fine by default. SSL
is terminated on the director, and connections are automatically
proxyed in plain text.
Still wonder a little about v2.0 director vs. v1.2 backends, but doubt it
should matter much..
Complete (single-node) director configuration,
I plan on putting two dovecot directors in front of our backend dovecot
pop/imap servers, instead of our current haproxy loadbalancing of the
connections -- but how do we handle SSL in such a setup. Will all SSL be
terminated on the directors automatically, and then proxyed plain text,
or is there
It's long over due, but now I finally plan on upgrading from v1.0.15 to
v1.2.16 on our servers. Would appreciate any comments!
We have 7 servers, all running of the same GPFS filesystem. Both
maildirs and indexes are stored here. We use dovecot for POP/IMAP and
deliver. Currently we're using mysql
Please, any help with this issue.
Thanks.
Héctor Moreno Blanco.
-Mensaje original-
De: dovecot-bounces+hmoreno=gmv...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+hmoreno=gmv...@dovecot.org] En nombre de Héctor Moreno
Blanco
Enviado el: miércoles, 15 de diciembre de 2010 12:48
Para: dovecot@do
18 matches
Mail list logo
