Hi,
I am running a fair amount of stored e-mails on maildirs(10 GB+) in 846
folders that gets a fair amount of searching, and 20+ users accessing them,
mostly via IMAP and a few POP3 accounts. I am running these on a Linode XEN
server and have yet to hit any hard limits of "bare metal". User and V
Quoting a...@test123.ru:
Guys. Who is interested in obvious reasoning?
The same people who are interested in vague questions?
Let me remind original concrete question. I am also interested.
We can "exchange" CPU & RAM to minimize disk i/o.
Should we change to dovecot 2.0?
Maybe mdbox can h
Guys. Who is interested in obvious reasoning? More memory, bare metal, depends
on your needs, bla-bla-bla. Let me remind original concrete question. I am also
interested.
> We can "exchange" CPU & RAM to minimize disk i/o.
> Should we change to dovecot 2.0?
> Maybe mdbox can help us?
> Maybe e
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
Eric you missed up above that he's running Dovecot on an ESX cluster, so
SSDs or any hardware dedicated to Dovecot isn't possible for the OP.
Well, it is true I know nothing about vmware/ESX. I know in my virtual
machine setups, I _can_ give the virtual instances acc
On 2010-12-11 3:00 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Hello Timo, and all.
>
> Preface:
> From time to time we have problems with thunderbird. The problem is
> that mail client begin to sync users inbox (or other folder) and this
> process didn't stop. Last time we have this situation - our
> monitoring
Is there a specific order in which one has to add servers to
director_mail_servers, Let's say I have 20 loadbalanced director servers (I
dont, but for arguments sake). I want to add 5 servers to
director_mail_servers. If I do this by restarting each director server 1 by 1
with an updated conf,
* Stan Hoeppner :
> Mark Moseley put forth on 12/10/2010 2:25 PM:
>
> > Yeah, my comment on the kernel thing was just in reply to one of Cor's
> > 3 debugging tracks, 1 of which was to try upgrading the kernel. I
> > figured I should mention the load issue if he might be upgrading to
> > the lates
Tony Pyro put forth on 12/10/2010 4:29 PM:
> Hello,
>
> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
> . search BODY "waldo"
> * SEARCH
> . OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
> . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJEC
Eric Rostetter put forth on 12/10/2010 10:11 PM:
> Quoting javierdemig...@us.es:
>
>> in our vmware esx cluster. We want to minimize disk I/O, what config
>> options should we use. We can "exchange" CPU & RAM to minimize disk i/o.
>
> Depends on what you are doing -- pop3, imap, both, deliver or
Would it be ok to set director_user_expire to a very high value? Say 1 day?
This would pretty much lock a user into a specific server right? What if I set
it to 1 year? :)
What happens when the server a user is locked into disappears (i remove it from
the pool). Then a day later, I add the se
Mark Moseley put forth on 12/10/2010 2:25 PM:
> Yeah, my comment on the kernel thing was just in reply to one of Cor's
> 3 debugging tracks, 1 of which was to try upgrading the kernel. I
> figured I should mention the load issue if he might be upgrading to
> the latest/greatest, since it could mak
Hello Timo, and all.
Preface:
From time to time we have problems with thunderbird. The problem is that mail
client begin to sync users inbox (or other folder) and this process didn't
stop. Last time we have this situation - our monitoring system shows unusual
amount of imap traffic send to one
12 matches
Mail list logo
