Quoting javierdemig...@us.es:
in our vmware esx cluster. We want to minimize disk I/O, what config
options should we use. We can "exchange" CPU & RAM to minimize disk i/o.
Depends on what you are doing -- pop3, imap, both, deliver or some other
LDA? Do you care if the indexes are lost on rebo
Hello
These should help.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase?highlight=mail_location
http://wiki.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields
KuiZ
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Patrick McLean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/12/10 01:30 PM, Kui Zhang wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> It is is possible. You just need
This is probably a really dumb question, but here goes...
Is it possible to run the imap-login process from 1.2 against a 2.0 system?
--
Daniel
Hello,
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
. search BODY "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
. SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (1.768
Patrick McLean wrote:
Hi,
On 10/12/10 01:30 PM, Kui Zhang wrote:
Hello
It is is possible. You just need to replace the.
maildir: prefix with mdbox:, for mail_location, for each one of the
test mail boxes.
Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
question. I know wha
Hi,
On 10/12/10 01:30 PM, Kui Zhang wrote:
> Hello
>
> It is is possible. You just need to replace the.
>
> maildir: prefix with mdbox:, for mail_location, for each one of the
> test mail boxes.
>
Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
question. I know what I need to
Hello
We are using dovecot 1.2.x. In our setup we will have 1200
concurrent imap users (maildirs) and we have 2xraid5 sas 15k diks
mounted by iSCSI. The dovecot server (RHEL 5 x64) is
a virtual machine
in our vmware esx cluster. We want to minimize disk I/O, what config
options should we use
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mark Moseley put forth on 12/9/2010 12:18 PM:
>
>> If you at some point upgrade to >2.6.35, I'd be interested to hear if
>> the load skyrockets on you. I also get the impression that the load
>> average calculation in these recent kernels is '
Oops! Config problem. Typing should be second nature by now huh.
4 status inbox (UIDNEXT MESSAGES)
* STATUS "inbox" (MESSAGES 4716 UIDNEXT 101501)
4 OK Status completed.
5 status inbox (UIDNEXT MESSAGES)
* STATUS "inbox" (MESSAGES 4717 UIDNEXT 101502)
5 OK Status completed.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 2:
this command fails when the snarf plugin is enabled.
5 status inbox (UIDNEXT MESSAGES)
with the error:
Dec 10 13:57:57 tr27n12.aset.psu.edu dovecot: imap(tstem38): Panic: file
index-transaction.c: line 71: assertion failed: (box->opened)
If it isn't easy to reproduce, I'll spit out the conf
Hello
It is is possible. You just need to replace the.
maildir: prefix with mdbox:, for mail_location, for each one of the
test mail boxes.
also if you are using maildir++ quota. change it dovecot quota.
maildir++ does not work correctly with mdbox.
KuiZ
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Patr
Hi,
I am planning a migration of ~600 accounts to mdbox (from maildir) and
was hoping to do some initial testing of certain account. I am hoping to
use extra fields to migrate certain accounts in advance for testing, and
I can't find info on setting up extra fields with the "passwd" backend.
Is th
Hello everyone,
I'm experimenting with the quota warning plugin. I have the following
setting in Dovecot's general config:
plugin {
quota_warning = storage=75%% /var/www/contrib/doquotawarning.py 75
quota_warning2 = storage=90%% /var/www/contrib/doquotawarning.py 90
}
The doquotawarning.py s
>
> Using gcc:
> gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
We run gcc version 4.3.2
Im not using any configure options, except for a few that Timo had me try
during debugging.
Cor
When exim runs deliver -m and tries to write to a directory that does
not exist is causes a crash which stops the exim MTA.
Dec 9 23:20:38 mailhost exim: [ID 197553 mail.info] 2010-12-09 23:20:38
1PQpmu-0007O9-OD <= dovecot-bounces+user=domain.co...@dovecot.org H=dovecot.org
[62.236.108.70] P=
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> I'm using:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/dovecot-2 --enable-maintainer-mode && make
and
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed"
export CPPFLAGS='-Wl,--as-needed'
but omitting that makes no difference
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Uni
* Stan Hoeppner :
> Has anyone considered a compiler issue? A gcc optimization flags issue?
> A gcc version issue? Something along these lines?
Using gcc:
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
> Cor and Ralf, are you two using the same gcc version? Same flags? Are
> they different than the sw
On 08/12/2010 00:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:22 +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
>
>> I read in documentation that there is "mail_max_userip_connections", but
>> in this way i limit the login that come from same ip. If the same user
>> tries to connect from different ip, he s
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 12/10/2010 1:39 AM:
> * Timo Sirainen :
>
>> Cor's debugging has so far shown that a single epoll_wait() call can
>> sometimes generate a few thousand voluntary context switches. I can't
>> really understand how that's possible. Those epoll_wait() calls about
>> half
Timo Sirainen put forth on 12/9/2010 7:10 PM:
> On 10.12.2010, at 0.54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> However, this still doesn't seem to explain Ralf's issue, where the
>> kernel stays the same, but the Dovecot version changes, with 2.0.x
>> causing the high load and 1.2.x being normal. Maybe 2.0.x
20 matches
Mail list logo
