Re: [Dovecot] Last login tracking with login_executable

2010-11-06 Thread Denny Lin
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:38:04PM +0100, Ed W wrote: > On 14/10/2010 15:04, Denny Lin wrote: > > > >I was wondering if it would be possible to read the username/password > >from a Dovecot config file (like userdb/passdb/quota/expire) instead of > >using my.cnf. > > In that case I think just crea

Re: [Dovecot] Keep a copy of email.

2010-11-06 Thread mouss
Le 05/11/2010 19:02, Henrique Fernandes a écrit : Can dovecot-lda, keep a copy of any email that it receives in a diferente folder ? Like if u...@domain.com get an email. It goes to u...@domain.com inbox and goes to other folder..diferente that his mailboxes ? I want this with all users. Can i

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stan Hoeppner : > >> 2.6.32-23-generic-pae, from Ubuntu > > > > I'm using this one because the bigmem kernels in Debian had some > > problems (being: bigmem not working at all, it was not compiled in) > > And I'm guessing you're running a 32bit PAE kernel because VMWare ESX > still doesn't offi

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/6/2010 10:33 AM: > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > >>> I'm still using i686 systems, but I wouldn't think that would change >>> the version of GCC that gets installed. I'm not sure if this may be >>> playing a role in this problem or not. What kernel version are you >>> r

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > > I'm still using i686 systems, but I wouldn't think that would change > > the version of GCC that gets installed. I'm not sure if this may be > > playing a role in this problem or not. What kernel version are you > > running, stock Debian or rolled from source? > > 2.6.3

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stan Hoeppner : > Hmm. My Lenny systems have 4.3.2-2. Are you maybe using Squeeze, not > Lenny? Yes, squeeze, sorry > I'm still using i686 systems, but I wouldn't think that would change > the version of GCC that gets installed. I'm not sure if this may be > playing a role in this problem o

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/6/2010 9:15 AM: > * Stan Hoeppner : > >> What hardware platform? (AMD/Intel/SPARC/PPC, generation/freq) > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz > >> What OS platform? > Debian lenny > >> What compiler/version? > gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-2) Hmm

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stan Hoeppner : > What hardware platform? (AMD/Intel/SPARC/PPC, generation/freq) Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz > What OS platform? Debian lenny > What compiler/version? gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-2) > What threading library? ? how do I find out? > If IPC is the culpr

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Daniel L. Miller : > Dunno if you ever mentioned it - or if it makes any difference - but > what configure/build options are you using for 1.2 vs 2.0? Any > difference in the compiler? Is your 1.2 a distro pre-packaged binary? No, both have been compiled from source using these options: ./co

Re: [Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

2010-11-06 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/5/2010 4:23 AM: > Due to the ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x I switched back to > 1.2.15 yesterday evening, with no changes to the machine or my users. > > (I migrated from 1.2.15 to 2.0.x by converting the existing config) > > Today, we have MUCH LESS load,