Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

Karsten Bräckelmann put forth on 10/24/2010 6:34 PM: > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no >>> need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. >> >> How old is glibc 2.10? >> >> I th

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no > > need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. > > How old is glibc 2.10? > > I thought Debian Lenny (which I use) was old. It's approachi

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

Paul Howarth put forth on 10/24/2010 2:16 PM: > Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no > need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. How old is glibc 2.10? I thought Debian Lenny (which I use) was old. It's approaching two years since re

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:26:51 +0100 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 24.10.2010, at 20.16, Paul Howarth wrote: > > >> A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists > >> in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be > >> actually using either of them? I was thinki

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On 24.10.2010, at 20.16, Paul Howarth wrote: >> A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists >> in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be >> actually using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring >> this problem. > > Don't know about Ubuntu

[Dovecot] Public Folders for spam/nospam -> don't get it

hi, Dovecot: 2.0.5 I want to use public folders (maildir), for my spam mails to feed spamassassin, but I don't get it working. My Evolution 2.28.3 (nothing else tested) can't subscribe the folders: namespace { hidden = no inbox = yes list = yes location = prefix = INBOX/ separator

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:10:08 +0100 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 22.10.2010, at 19.22, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > In glibc 2.10 (32 bit) fallocate() exists but fallocate64() doesn't. > > When _FILE_OFFSET_BITS==64, fallocate() is a redirect to > > fallocate64() and the program can't be linked (fails

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

On 24.10.2010, at 18.46, Michael M. Slusarz wrote: >>> Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then >>> synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached >>> mails? >> >> I'm pretty sure they will. I'm not aware of any good way to handle >> this, other than ALE

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

Quoting Timo Sirainen : On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? I

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

* Timo Sirainen : > On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: > > >> and gives any user logging in a canned mail > >> (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then > > synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cache

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: >> and gives any user logging in a canned mail >> (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize > to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? I'm pretty sure they

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On 24/10/2010 15:10, Timo Sirainen wrote: A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be actually using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring this problem. I thought you were fixing bugs coming o

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:10:08 +0100 Timo Sirainen articulated: > On 22.10.2010, at 19.22, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > In glibc 2.10 (32 bit) fallocate() exists but fallocate64() doesn't. > > When _FILE_OFFSET_BITS==64, fallocate() is a redirect to > > fallocate64() and the program can't be linked (

Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10

On 22.10.2010, at 19.22, Paul Howarth wrote: > In glibc 2.10 (32 bit) fallocate() exists but fallocate64() doesn't. > When _FILE_OFFSET_BITS==64, fallocate() is a redirect to fallocate64() > and the program can't be linked (fails to find symbol fallocate64). > See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/500487

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Patrick Ben Koetter : > > * Edgar Fuß : > > > > and gives any user logging in a canned mail > > > > (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > > > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then > > > synchronize > > > to that canned state, i.e., delete a

Re: [Dovecot] different certificates on different services ?

hi, > on dovecot 2.0.x, is it possible to serve different certificates on > different services (pops,imaps) with one dovecot instance ? tamsy pointet me to the dovecot wiki: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration thanks, and sorry for not looking there.. regards, Christoph

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

* Patrick Ben Koetter : > * Edgar Fuß : > > > and gives any user logging in a canned mail > > > (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize > > to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? > > See "Alert

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

* Edgar Fuß : > > and gives any user logging in a canned mail > > (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then > synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached > mails? Well, I don't know. Some clients see the abse

[Dovecot] different certificates on different services ?

Hi, on dovecot 2.0.x, is it possible to serve different certificates on different services (pops,imaps) with one dovecot instance ? regards, Christoph Kuchenbuch

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-antispam-1.3 multiple plugin load

Well, At present, I modify dovecot-antispam-1.3 for dovecot-1.2 to allow a nospam folder, and it's running. I think, that a plugin that catch moved to a specific folder or assign a keyword and exec script could be useful for anyone. NOTE: It's my first code change on any dovecot/plugins code. 2

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

* Edgar Fuß : > > and gives any user logging in a canned mail > > (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") > Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize > to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? See "Alerts" in

Re: [Dovecot] "Maintenance instance"

> and gives any user logging in a canned mail > (e.g. "We're doing maintenance, go away") Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails?

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-antispam-1.3 multiple plugin load

I need to detect when a mail is moved to a specific folder. It's mail is moved to folder1, then exec script 1 It's mail is moved to folder2, then exec script 2 One of this scripts it's a mark as ham, It removes -SPAM- mark from subject, pass to spamassassin to learn as harm and then, leave th