On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 15:49:46 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 13:46:17 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> [...]
> > Weird. Does it log with attached patch that commit was successful?
> [...]
>
> THanks, I'm testing this now.
Yes, it shows that the commit was successful, but the
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.10.2010, at 21.52, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> > PS: Timo, in the options shown when one runs the configure script, should
> > the dbox option be removed?
> >
> > [r...@gw] ~wash/Tools/Dovecot/dovecot-2.0/dovecot-2.0.6# ./configure
In article ,
Nicholas Riley wrote:
> I'm trying to convert from an old Dovecot (1.0.15) and mbox to a new
> Dovecot and maildir. I'm running into several problems with dsync which
> are causing my mboxes not to convert.
>
> If I use LAYOUT=fs (as I'd prefer) I get an error because I have a
I'm trying to convert from an old Dovecot (1.0.15) and mbox to a new
Dovecot and maildir. I'm running into several problems with dsync which
are causing my mboxes not to convert.
If I use LAYOUT=fs (as I'd prefer) I get an error because I have a
mailbox called "subscriptions", and none of my m
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yeah. Not very nice either. Here's a 3rd option: Apply the attached
> patch to v1.2 and then open all users' all mailboxes (write a script
> or something). It should convert all maildir files to dbox files. Try
> with one account first to make sure it works. :)
Hi Timo, lis
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 23:01 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So you're using dbox? Yeah, you can set home like that then. Although with
> dbox because of the mailboxes/ directory it's actually not bad to set home =
> mail dir.
Yeah, I'm using mdbox. I'll set home = mail dir then and upgrade to
2.0.
check your mail log, if you get this:
Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info
then it could be related to this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566844
if you do have that issue let me know, and I'll look up our notes to
post a work around.
On Thu, Oct 21,
On 22.10.2010, at 0.53, Andre wrote:
> is it safe to set the home directory to, say,
>
> /var/spool/imap/$hash/$username/home
>
> ? I assume it is, since the mailboxes are in the 'mailboxes' directory
> and thus the conflicts mentioned in the wiki can't happen, right?
So you're using dbox? Yea
On 21.10.2010, at 22.58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Looks like OS X has fcntl(F_PREALLOCATE), although it doesn't seem to produce
> any visible results, other than giving ENOSPC error if I give too large of a
> size (100 MB or so). Disk usage doesn't shrink though, so maybe it's more of
> a hint?..
On 20.10.2010, at 17.53, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> "What you want is _physical_ preallocation, not speculative
>> preallocation. i.e. look up XFS_IOC_RESVSP or FIEMAP so your
>> application does _permanent_ preallocate past EOF.
>
> Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 22:13 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> This reminds me of a problem with missing home directory. That crash is fixed
> in v2.0.6, but you should have a home directory set so that reject/vacation
> messages won't be duplicated. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers/Home
Given m
On 21.10.2010, at 23.14, Andre wrote:
> This shows up in the mail error when the sieve error happens. It seems
> the sieve error is a side-effect of something else:
>
> Oct 21 17:58:11 box6 dovecot: lmtp(10424,
> catia.comercial=industriacarvalho.com...@lmtp1.prv.f1.k8.com.br): Error:
> lstat((nu
On 21.10.2010, at 19.14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> + mdbox: Added mdbox_preallocate_space setting (Linux+ext3/XFS only)
ext4 of course, not ext3. Also requires Linux kernel v2.6.23 or newer and glibc
2.10 or newer.
On 21.10.2010, at 21.52, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> PS: Timo, in the options shown when one runs the configure script, should
> the dbox option be removed?
>
> [r...@gw] ~wash/Tools/Dovecot/dovecot-2.0/dovecot-2.0.6# ./configure --help
> | grep dbox
> (maildir mbox dbox
On 2010-10-21 4:52 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> For the fun of it, i used --with-storages="maildir mbox dbox mdbox cydir"
> (not intending to use all, but just to see) and this led `make` to fail with
> something about dbox, so I simply removed it and got a successful compile.
Its not dbox any
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.6.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.6.tar.gz.sig
>
>* Pre-login CAPABILITY includes IDLE again. Mainly to make
> Blackberry
> servers happy.
>* auth: aut
This shows up in the mail error when the sieve error happens. It seems
the sieve error is a side-effect of something else:
Oct 21 17:58:11 box6 dovecot: lmtp(10424,
catia.comercial=industriacarvalho.com...@lmtp1.prv.f1.k8.com.br): Error:
lstat((null)) failed: Bad address
Oct 21 17:58:11 box6 dovec
"Stan Hoeppner" wrote on 21.10.2010 10:29:50:
>
>This will kill a huge amount of bot spam without dnsbl queries or
>greylisting, both of which can be resource hogs and add serious latency:
>
>http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
>
Stan,
nice one. I'm wondering from where did you compile this
Timo Sirainen put forth on 10/21/2010 9:52 AM:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better: Linux
>>> has fallocate() that can do it for other filesystems than just XFS. Or
>>> looks like it's only XFS and ext4 (ext
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.6.tar.gz.sig
* Pre-login CAPABILITY includes IDLE again. Mainly to make Blackberry
servers happy.
* auth: auth_cache_negative_ttl default was 0 in earlier v2.0.x, but it
On 10/21/2010 07:37 AM, Fabricio Archanjo wrote:
> Does someone run dspam or just me??
> I like very much this antispam solution.
>
I use it with Eugene's port/fork of dovecot-antispam to dovecot 2.0. I
use it with amavisd. I use postfix in the mix. On machines where people
don't care about danger
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 19:42 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> > Oct 21 16:33:18 lda: Error: userdb lookup:
> > connect(/opt/dovecot2/var/run/auth-userdb) failed: Permission denied
> > (euid=26(mailnull) egid=26(mailnull) missing +r perm:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:20:51 +0200
fake...@fakessh.eu articulated:
> it is the webmail problem or postfix problem
Or something else; or not!
--
Jerry ✌
dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 19:42 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Oct 21 16:33:18 lda: Error: userdb lookup:
> connect(/opt/dovecot2/var/run/auth-userdb) failed: Permission denied
> (euid=26(mailnull) egid=26(mailnull) missing +r perm:
> /opt/dovecot2/var/run/auth-userdb, euid is not dir owner)
It'
I am having problems with dovecot regarding base_dir:
I have ::
base_dir = /opt/dovecot2/var/run/
For some reason, I have to set permissions to(chmod -R 1777
/opt/dovecot2/var/) for dovecot to run properly, but when I start dovecot, I
see this:
[r...@gw] /opt/dovecot2/etc/dovecot# less /var/log/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
it is the webmail problem or postfix problem
dearty dancing
Le 21.10.2010 20:13, Andre a écrit :
> Sigh. The webmail broke the configuration output. Here's it again.
>
> # 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-serv
Sigh. The webmail broke the configuration output. Here's it again.
# 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-server x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_mechanisms = plain login
auth_username_chars =
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnop
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:30 -0700, RParr wrote:
> I am running Ubuntu 10.04 packages postfix 2.7.0-1, dovecot-common,
> dovecot-imapd, dovecot-pop3d, and dovecot-postfix (all version
> 1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1).
..
> My understanding, from the Dovecot wiki and other docs/postings is that
> the folders
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:17 +0100, William Gallafent wrote:
> In other words, I want "ssl_require_client_cert = yes" for remote
> connections (on port 993), but "ssl_require_client_cert = no" for
> local connections using non-tls imap on port 143. Is this possible?
With v2.0, yes. With v1.2 .. I
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:57 +0300, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> Oct 21 09:52:48 imap-login: Error: Timeout waiting for handshake from
> auth server. my pid=13338, input bytes=0
auth process is hanging or imap-login is connecting to wrong server.
First try deleting everything from Dovecot's base_dir (/va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21.10.2010 16:13, an...@digirati.com.br a écrit :
> Em 21/10/2010, Stephan Bosch escreveu:
> > Output from: dovecot -n
>
> # 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-server x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04
On 2010-10-21 10:40 AM, William Blunn wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 14:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Reiserfs is not 'kaput', it is still being maintained in the linux
>> kernel (both v3 and work is ongoing for v4), and will be for the
>> foreseeable future.
>
> For the benefit of anyone reading this and
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:08 +0200, Tobias Daucher wrote:
> we found a serious bug while testing our migration scripts.
> in Solaris (or other system 5) the user variable is not always set.
> Dsync is not very happy about that and crashes with an segmentation fault.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot
Hi,
we found a serious bug while testing our migration scripts.
in Solaris (or other system 5) the user variable is not always set.
Dsync is not very happy about that and crashes with an segmentation fault.
After hours of debugging and TWOE simple lines
# USER=$LOGNAME
# export USER
the problem wa
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:37 +0200, Oliver Eales wrote:
> *virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp *
LMTP does a userdb lookup normally.
> *Oct 21 15:48:03 auth: Info: passdb(username): allow_nets check failed:
> Remote IP not known
So this shouldn't be happening. Are you using userd
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better: Linux
> > has fallocate() that can do it for other filesystems than just XFS. Or
> > looks like it's only XFS and ext4 (ext3 doesn't support it). I don't
> > know if other
On 21/10/2010 14:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
Reiserfs is not 'kaput', it is still being maintained in the linux
kernel (both v3 and work is ongoing for v4), and will be for the
foreseeable future.
For the benefit of anyone reading this and wondering "Well is it kaput
or not?": Charles and I are
Hello,
i am running dovevot 2.0.5 using ldap authentication with the allow_nets
paramter to limit access to some local networks.
The problem is, when i want to use the local lmtp socket from postfix
*virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp *
i get the follwing error:
*Oct 21 15:48
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:18:46AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:52:38 +0800
> Denny Lin articulated:
>
> > Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that. A better solution would be to check
> > the rDNS or SPF record and do sender verification if it doesn't match.
>
> Actually, "SPF" has bee
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:52:38 +0800
Denny Lin articulated:
> Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that. A better solution would be to check
> the rDNS or SPF record and do sender verification if it doesn't match.
Actually, "SPF" has been going out of vogue for awhile now and sensible
mail admins do not m
On 2010-10-21 9:37 AM, Fabricio Archanjo wrote:
> Does someone run dspam or just me??
> I like very much this antispam solution.
I *much* prefer ASSP myself...
Vastly easier to install/configure than dspam, and more effective too
imnsho, *especially out of the box, but even also after dspam is
pr
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:37:40 -0200, Fabricio Archanjo
wrote:
Does someone run dspam or just me??
I like very much this antispam solution.
I use dspam + sqlgrey + policyd-weight to prevent spam.
60% rejects are invalid recipient drop
30% nonreturning from sqlgrey
10% goes to dspam with autole
Em 21/10/2010, Stephan Bosch escreveu:
> Output from: dovecot -n
# 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-server x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_mechanisms = plain login
auth_username_chars =
abcdefghijklmnopq
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:26:46AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> > Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
> > like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
>
> If you mean you are using *sender* address verification on the
Does someone run dspam or just me??
I like very much this antispam solution.
On 10/21/10, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
>> Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
>> like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
>
> If you mean you
On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
> like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
If you mean you are using *sender* address verification on these
domains, you will eventually get blacklisted by them if your system has
On 2010-10-21 6:58 AM, William Blunn wrote:
> Though in the case of the "small number of large files" (i.e. the
> opposite of ReiserFS's strength), which you would get with mbox and
> mdbox,
Good point...
> one would have to ask what upside ReiserFS would bring to the party
> which would outweigh
Op 21-10-2010 14:29, an...@digirati.com.br schreef:
Hello,
I've been getting these messages in dmesg:
[1663649.206652] lmtp[4961]: segfault at 18 ip 7fb5b6aab1f0
sp7fff7e3b5468 error 4 in libdovecot-sieve.so.0.0.0[7fb5b6a6d000
+66000]
Dovecot's version is 2.0.3. Is this known? What
Hello,
I've been getting these messages in dmesg:
[1663649.206652] lmtp[4961]: segfault at 18 ip 7fb5b6aab1f0 sp7fff7e3b5468
error 4 in libdovecot-sieve.so.0.0.0[7fb5b6a6d000
+66000]
Dovecot's version is 2.0.3. Is this known? What other kind of information could
be useful to help find
On 20/10/2010 18:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better:
Linux has fallocate() that can do it for other filesystems than just
XFS. Or looks like it's only XFS and ext4 (ext3 doesn't support it).
On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.10.2010, at 3.12, Denny Lin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 06:45:17PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:32 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Oh, interesting.
Robby Gunawan wrote on 10/21/2010:
how do I install / update to my system?
Normally you should patch the file(s) in the source package.
You can compile Dovecot from the official sources (apply the patch
before), download/install Dovecot from Mercurial (hg.dovecot.org) or
open a bugreport
Jose Luis Faria wrote on 10/20/2010:
Hello people,
I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging
Security Suite from Trendmicro.
I need to develop a new solution with:
- postfix
- dovecot
- anti-spam
- anti-malware.
I am thankful any help or suggestion for anti-spam a
Denny Lin wrote on 10/20/2010:
Currently, I am using a setup with Postfix + Dovecot as well.
We're using these DNSBL blacklists:
zen.spamhaus.org
b.barracudacentral.org
cbl.abuseat.org
bl.spamcop.net
dnsbl.njabl.org
info:
it's not needed to use cbl.abuseat.org AND zen.spamhaus.org because
Jose Luis Faria put forth on 10/20/2010 11:20 AM:
> Hello people,
>
> I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
> Suite from Trendmicro.
>
> I need to develop a new solution with:
> - postfix
> - dovecot
> - anti-spam
> - anti-malware.
>
> I am thankful any hel
Hello,
Upgraded from 1.2.x to 2.0.5, converted configuration as described in
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 and now I'm unable to log in to
imap server. Dovecot error.log shows:
Oct 21 09:52:48 imap-login: Error: Timeout waiting for handshake from
auth server. my pid=13338, input byt
Robby Gunawan wrote on 10/21/2010:
Dear all,
Please help me, I just change from vm-pop3d to dovecot, installed from
rpm that provided by dovecot.org, I got this error for random email
user
Command died with signal 11:
"/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
maybe this patch helps?
http://hg.dove
57 matches
Mail list logo