Hi, again.
1. Can somebody explain me about dovecot's shared mailboxes?
2. What does it do while searching shared mailboxes (debug_log cannot explain
it)? What files is it looking for?
3. Need i set dovecot-shared file into directory which are shared (if i want to
have separate flags for separa
Brandon,
I just fail to see why adding more complexity, and essentially making
$9K load balancers redundant, is the way of the future, Timo has said
its very safe for index's if non dovecot programs write to the maildir,
so why the hell is it deliberately left risky using dovecots deliver,
I've see
Noel,
On 8/26/10 9:59 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>> I fail to see advantage if anything it add in more point of failure, with
>
> i agree with this and it is why we dont use it
>
> we use dovecots deliver with postfix and have noticed no problems, not
> to say there was none, but if so, we dont
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:54 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
> Halo,
> Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load balancer.
it is no advantage over a dedicated hardware solution, but director does
not do the exact same thing.
> I fail to see advantage if anything it add in mo
Hi,
I am running dovecot 1.2.11 on mac osx 1.5.8. Everything works
perfectly with the application-level firewall off, but enabling the
application firewall prevents dovecot connections. I have tried
explicitly authorizing dovecot in the firewall, but it does not work.
I have searche
Thanks for the tip. I saw the section on converting from uw-imap, but
it's still not working. I still can not get to my mail folders, other
than INBOX. I think the problem goes back to Dovecot can't determine
the home directory?
ug 26 22:08:36 gremlin dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.debug] imap(i
On 27.8.2010, at 2.52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> Won't files hashed with the old function begin to dupe though?
>>
>> You mean new hash would become a duplicate of the old? Well ..
>>
>> 1) It's highly unlikely to happen, especially because with the new
>> hash function there again shouldn't b
On 08/26/2010 09:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.8.2010, at 2.24, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Have a utility that updates all (or a subset) of them.
That won't be necessary. Once the hash changes, the new files
are created with new hash function and it doesn't matter if the
old hash is broken b
On 27.8.2010, at 2.24, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> Have a utility that updates all (or a subset) of them.
>>
>> That won't be necessary. Once the hash changes, the new files are
>> created with new hash function and it doesn't matter if the old hash
>> is broken because you can't generate new fil
On 08/26/2010 09:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.8.2010, at 1.52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/26/2010 04:41 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
1. What hash algorithm to use?
2. Should I add support for trusting hash uniqueness
Use two hash functions and concatenate the hashes. While both
hash sy
On 27.8.2010, at 1.52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 04:41 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
>>> 1. What hash algorithm to use?
>>
>>> 2. Should I add support for trusting hash uniqueness
>>
>> Use two hash functions and concatenate the hashes. While both hash
>> systems may eventually be hacked
On 27.8.2010, at 1.47, Edward avanti wrote:
>>> Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load
>> balancer.
>>
>> It guarantees that the same user is accessed via the same server. Hardware
>> LB can at best assign the connections from the same IP to the same server
>> (but not
On 08/26/2010 04:41 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
1. What hash algorithm to use?
2. Should I add support for trusting hash uniqueness
Use two hash functions and concatenate the hashes. While both hash
systems may eventually be hacked it is unlikely that hacking them
will result in a targeted alias
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.8.2010, at 23.54, Edward avanti wrote:
>
> > Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load
> balancer.
>
> It guarantees that the same user is accessed via the same server. Hardware
> LB can at best assign the conne
On 27.8.2010, at 0.39, Brandon Lamb wrote:
>> 2010-08-26 16:20:51 master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit
>> reached, client connections are being dropped
..
> Going to double my process limit from 100 to 256 and bump up the
> vsz_limit and see if I can make it go away
That's service(auth)
On 27.8.2010, at 0.35, Brandon Lamb wrote:
> While running some doveadm expunge -A mailbox Spam savedbefore 30d and
> doveadm purge -A after
Hmm. Maybe it's opening a new auth connection for each user? I'll check it out
later.
> 2010-08-26 16:20:51 auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many ope
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Brandon Lamb wrote:
> While running some doveadm expunge -A mailbox Spam savedbefore 30d and
> doveadm purge -A after
>
> 2010-08-26 16:20:51 auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many open files
> 2010-08-26 16:20:51 master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit
>
Read up on namespace configuration some more.
Dovecot makes the sort of thing you're talking about very easy if you
familiarize yourself with namespaces first. It can overcome most of the
problems caused by historical poor choices in client configuration.
-Brian
On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:09 PM,
While running some doveadm expunge -A mailbox Spam savedbefore 30d and
doveadm purge -A after
2010-08-26 16:20:51 auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many open files
2010-08-26 16:20:51 master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit
reached, client connections are being dropped
2010-08-26 16:21:2
On 26.8.2010, at 23.54, Edward avanti wrote:
> Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load balancer.
It guarantees that the same user is accessed via the same server. Hardware LB
can at best assign the connections from the same IP to the same server (but not
e.g. new mail
Halo,
Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load balancer.
I fail to see advantage if anything it add in more point of failure, with
several hundred thousand user, we can ill afford to mess around or add to
complexity, sometime keeping it simple is simply way to be, when use
So I'm very frustrated, I've spent the better part of a day trying to
get dovecot 2.0.1 working...Most of the documentation on the Wiki seems
to think you are running an older version and therefore very little of
it applies.
I'm running 2.0.1 on OpenSolaris.
I seem to have 2 remaining issues
There is a roff typo in pigeonhole's sievec.1.in. Roff treats the leading
apostrophe on line 54 as an invalid command and produces bad output:
dump to be written to stdout. The out-file argument may
also be omitted, which has the same effect as for a com-
> 1. What hash algorithm to use?
> 2. Should I add support for trusting hash uniqueness
Use two hash functions and concatenate the hashes. While both hash systems may
eventually be hacked it is unlikely that hacking them will result in a targeted
alias.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 26.08.2010 um 22:00 schrieb Carlos Mennens:
>
> Thanks. I copied the config that was in dovecot-new.conf into
> dovecot.conf. Now when I attempt to login, it tells me it can't find
> my SSL certificates when they're clearly there. Is ther
Am 26.08.2010 um 22:00 schrieb Carlos Mennens:
> Thanks. I copied the config that was in dovecot-new.conf into
> dovecot.conf. Now when I attempt to login, it tells me it can't find
> my SSL certificates when they're clearly there. Is there something
> special I need to do in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/1
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, David wrote:
> The command Timo gave you writes out the new configuration to
> dovecot-new.conf. You need
>
> I recommend you backup your existing configuration first, then try and
> replace it. Like so:
>
> $ cd /etc/dovecot/
> $ cp dovecot.conf dovecot.conf-bac
Am 26.08.2010 um 21:46 schrieb Carlos Mennens:
>> doveconf -n > dovecot-new.conf
>
> Timo,
>
> I ran that command and unless I am missing something...it didn't help.
The purpose of this exercise was to replace the old config *FILE* with
'dovecot-new.conf' unless you missed that...
On 26/08/2010 20:46, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:52 -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
The list was much longer but I was able to self resolve them. I was
wondering if someone here can assist me in converting my
'dovecot.conf'
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:52 -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>
>> The list was much longer but I was able to self resolve them. I was
>> wondering if someone here can assist me in converting my
>> 'dovecot.conf' file?
>
> doveconf -n > dovecot-ne
Den 26.08.2010 21:27, skrev Egbert:
Hi,
Second try...
I have mailsystem with virtual users only (/home/vmail/domain/user). I
need to integrate RT3.x (a ticketing system). I have installed the
RT-client but I need to send the mail to an extrnal program. Rt wants
me to insert:
|/usr/bin/rt-m
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:52 -0400, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> The list was much longer but I was able to self resolve them. I was
> wondering if someone here can assist me in converting my
> 'dovecot.conf' file?
doveconf -n > dovecot-new.conf
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 20:32 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0-sis contains the code for it.
> Otherwise it's the latest (as of writing this) dovecot-2.0 hg tree.
> Please test if you're interested in SIS. :)
One more point that I have to remember to mention once I wri
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0-sis contains the code for it.
Otherwise it's the latest (as of writing this) dovecot-2.0 hg tree.
Please test if you're interested in SIS. :)
Once there's at least some testing, I'll probably add this to v2.0.x
since very little of this new code is used when SIS i
Hi,
Second try...
I have mailsystem with virtual users only (/home/vmail/domain/user). I
need to integrate RT3.x (a ticketing system). I have installed the
RT-client but I need to send the mail to an extrnal program. Rt wants me
to insert:
|/usr/bin/rt-mailgate --queue bla --action bla --url
I just upgraded my Dovecot IMAP package on my mail server and when I
restarted the service, I got the following warnings...
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:12:
add auth_ prefix to all settings inside auth {} and remove the auth {}
section completely
doveconf: Warni
Thanks Charles,
We're running 1.1.14. So we'll start by upgrading.
Best Regards,
María
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+melinger=pert.com...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+melinger=pert.com...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Marcus
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:22 PM
1.1.x is getting old, and I've seen Timo comment many times that
upgrading to a current 1.2 or even 2.0 will likely fix problems like
this - so imo that would be the first things to try...
Maria Elinger wrote:
> Hi David and all,
> Did you find any solution or workaround at your site?, it woul
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > > Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet,
> > > 1:4294967295 should work too.
> >
> > 1:4294967295 doesn't really fill me with joy either -- that assumes
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet,
> > 1:4294967295 should work too.
>
> 1:4294967295 doesn't really fill me with joy either -- that assumes that
> a UID is limited to 32 bits unsigned...
It is, as defined b
Hi David and all,
I´ve read the mail you posted in the Dovecot list.
We´re are having this same problem in a site which is very similar to yours.
We also migrated from Courier to Dovecot nearly 9 months ago, and every now and
then users complain about slowness in
the imap connection. We fix it
Again, what does mean this strings?
Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER1 za...@badmltd.dn.ua
service=lib-storage
Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER2 t...@badmltd.dn.ua
service=lib-storage
Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER2 t..
Am 26.08.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Carsten Laun-De Lellis:
> No more errors !
>
> But when i try to start dovecot the following message appears:
> r...@s04:/usr/local/etc/dovecot# /etc/init.d/dovecot start
> Starting DovecotFatal: service(imap-login) User doesn't exist: dovenull
>
Yes :) Ha
Hi Thomas
Thank you very much. To wrap the lines does the trick. But as always my
dovecot -n is now:
r...@s04:/usr/local/etc/dovecot# dovecot -n
# 2.0.0: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_mechanisms = plain login
disable_plaintext_a
Am 26.08.2010 um 15:45 schrieb Carsten Laun-De Lellis:
> verbose_ssl = yes
> doveconf: Error: userdb is missing driver
> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
> /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: userdb is missing driver
See except from ' /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-static.conf.ext'
#use
Sorry
In my first email i posted the wrong output from dovecot -n.
Here it comes again:
userdb {
args = uid=1 gid=1 home=/mail/%d/%n allow_all_users=yes
}
verbose_ssl = yes
doveconf: Error: userdb is missing driver
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dove
Hi guys
After fixing my master_auth problem i have one error message left and i
don't know what to do.
The message from dovecot -n is:
service auth {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
group = vmail
mode = 0666
user = vmail
}
unix_listener auth-master {
mode =
Hi Thomas
Thank you very much for your hints, but they didn't help me out. I fixed
the problem by replacing the auth_master in the 1.2 config with
service auth {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
group = vmail
mode = 0666
user = vmail
}
unix_listener auth-master {
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:04 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the
> > 1:* in it
>
> I changed it in v2.0.
>
> > -- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating to
Hi, first of all for forgive me for my english.
I have several questions.
1. There are 2 user/passwd databases in my setup - ldap and mysql. when i
login into one user with telnet 127.0.0.1 143 and share inbox to some users -
records in dict-file apears? but if i delete some acls - records ind
Am 26.08.2010 um 14:21 schrieb Carsten Laun-De Lellis:
> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
> /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line 1036: Unknown setting:
> auth_socket
> doveconf: Error: managesieve-login: dump-capability process returned 89
> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration
Hi everyone
I am not the dovecot guru and i would appreciate if anyone could help me
on my problems.
I am running a mail server on dovecot 1.2 and want to migrate to dovecot
2. I have edited the conf file and now using the new keywords and got
everything fixed but the following error message stil
On 26.8.2010, at 12.39, William Blunn wrote:
> Does Dovecot support the use of the INDEX directive for mdbox?
>
> e.g.
>
> mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%u
Sure. But be sure not to lose the indexes.
Does Dovecot support the use of the INDEX directive for mdbox?
e.g.
mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%u
Bill
A tarball created from current pigeonhole hg using "make dist" doesn't
include the files doc/man/{reporting-bugs.inc,sed.sh} and fails to build
as a result. Attached patch works for me.
Paul
--- dovecot-2.0.1/dovecot-2-0-pigeonhole-d51650c8af85/doc/man/Makefile.am 2010-08-23 18:26:12.0
Hi all,
can I expunge or search emails in public folders?
The command 'doveadm expunge -u rzimmermann mailbox Public/folder all' does not
delete
emails in the folder 'Public/folder'.
The command 'doveadm expunge -u rzimmermann mailbox Spam all' does delete
emails in the folder 'Spam'.
The user
connect = host=127.0.0.1 user=mail password=thecorrectpass dbname=mail
map {
pattern = shared/expire/$user/$mailbox
table = mail.expires
value_field = expire_stamp
fields {
username = $user
mailbox = $mailbox
}
}
dovecot: auth: Error: mysql: Query failed, retrying: Table 'mail
57 matches
Mail list logo
