El 17/08/2010 3:04, Stephan Bosch escribió:
Xavier Pons wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the last mercurial release of
dovecot-pigeonhole 2.0 and get this error:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2
-Wbad-f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Does 2.0 require a specific version of vpopmail? I'm getting this on
my build attempt :
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/dovecot-2.0.0/src/auth/passdb-vpopmail.c:185: undefined
reference to `vauth_load_module'
Yes, it's an RPM, that'
> On 16.8.2010, at 23.25, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> "imap-match.c", line 199: identifier redeclared: imap_match_dup
>
> I think someone reported this problem earlier .. but I'm not sure. Anyway
> I've no idea why it would complain about this.
>
>> So that stops me while I figure out what the issue
Xavier Pons wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the last mercurial release of dovecot-pigeonhole
2.0 and get this error:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2
-Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/kerber
>I wonder how GCCFSS would do. Will it even run under Solaris 8?
# which gcc
/opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc
# gcc --version
gcc (Blastwave.org Inc. Mon Aug 9 07:10:45 GMT 2010) 4.5.1
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Ther
> On 8/16/10 8:38 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> Works fine here with the 12.1 compiler. Solaris 10 on UltraSPARC,
>>> current patches, on both the OS and the compilers. My CFLAGS:
>>>
>>> -fast -xtarget=ultra3 -m32 -xarch=sparcvis2
> >
>> The is ye ol'production Solaris 8 and thus Sun St
> On 17.8.2010, at 1.28, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> *** Warning: Linking the shared library lib30_imap_zlib_plugin.la
>> against
>> the loadable module
>> *** lib20_zlib_plugin.so is not portable!
>>
>> Not too sure what is up with that but I'll look into it.
>
> That's normal. It doesn't need to b
On 8/16/10 8:38 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Works fine here with the 12.1 compiler. Solaris 10 on UltraSPARC,
current patches, on both the OS and the compilers. My CFLAGS:
-fast -xtarget=ultra3 -m32 -xarch=sparcvis2
>
The is ye ol'production Solaris 8 and thus Sun Studio 11 is needed.
>> So that stops me while I figure out what the issue is with imap-match.h
>> and/or imap-match.c in the Solaris world while using Sun Studio 11.
>
>Works fine here with the 12.1 compiler. Solaris 10 on UltraSPARC,
> current patches, on both the OS and the compilers. My CFLAGS:
>
>-fast
On 17.8.2010, at 1.28, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> *** Warning: Linking the shared library lib30_imap_zlib_plugin.la against
> the loadable module
> *** lib20_zlib_plugin.so is not portable!
>
> Not too sure what is up with that but I'll look into it.
That's normal. It doesn't need to be portable.
> On 16.8.2010, at 23.25, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> "imap-match.c", line 199: identifier redeclared: imap_match_dup
>
> I think someone reported this problem earlier .. but I'm not sure. Anyway
> I've no idea why it would complain about this.
>
>> So that stops me while I figure out what the issue
On 8/16/10 6:25 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
pool_vfuncs {..} v, unsigned int alloconly_pool :1, unsigned int
datastack_pool :1}, pointer to const struct imap_match_glob
{pointer to struct pool {..} pool, pointer to struct
imap_match_pattern {..} patterns, char sep, array[-1] of char
patterns_data})
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.8.2010, at 7.33, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
>
>> Would it work to run 'dsync mirror' every minute against either mdbox
>> or sdbox mailbox on a dedicated network connection between two (or
>> potentially three or four) mail servers? I'm tr
On 16.8.2010, at 23.25, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> "imap-match.c", line 199: identifier redeclared: imap_match_dup
I think someone reported this problem earlier .. but I'm not sure. Anyway I've
no idea why it would complain about this.
> So that stops me while I figure out what the issue is with im
Well , configure looked good and the summary seemed fine :
Install prefix . : /opt/csw
File offsets ... : 64bit
I/O polling : poll
I/O notifys : none
SSL : yes (OpenSSL)
GSSAPI . : yes
passdbs : static passwd passwd-file shadow pam checkpassword ldap
sql
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:22 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> a
> >
> No - I'm saying that an upgrade that does exactly the same thing as the
> earlier version should "just work" without having to research cryptic
> error messages you get after the new software fails to load. What I'm
> saying is tha
Sorry, my bad, i guess this flags does not exits.
It is an client feature, but is also in my webmail client. So i thought it
might be an imap flags!
Thanks!
[]'sf.rique
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.8.2010, at 22.11, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
>
> > Does dsync
On 8/16/2010 2:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 16.8.2010, at 22.01, Marc Perkel wrote:
But the %{login_domain} evaluates to an empty string as you can see from the
results of the debug.
What about %{login_user} or %{username}?
Actually - spoke too soon. %{username} returned the wrong val
On 8/16/2010 2:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 16.8.2010, at 22.01, Marc Perkel wrote:
But the %{login_domain} evaluates to an empty string as you can see from the
results of the debug.
What about %{login_user} or %{username}?
Interestingly %{login_user} doesn't work either returning an
On 16.8.2010, at 22.11, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
> Does dsync mirror follow up flags ?
There's no such standard flag in IMAP. Are you sure your client even sends it
to IMAP server? It would show up as a keyword. You can check it by talking IMAP
directly:
telnet localhost 143
a login user pass
On 16.8.2010, at 22.01, Marc Perkel wrote:
> But the %{login_domain} evaluates to an empty string as you can see from the
> results of the debug.
What about %{login_user} or %{username}?
Does dsync mirror follow up flags ?
I am testing here, and if i flag an msg as follow up, dsync does not do
anything.
It suppouse to be like that ?
Thanks!
[]'sf.rique
On 8/16/2010 11:26 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 11:17 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Odd - wonder what I'm doing wrong then? My result:
Aug 16 10:44:43 auth: Debug: sql(supp...@junkemailfilter.com,127.0.0.1):
query: SELECT user_name, domain_name, password FROM users WHERE
user_n
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 11:17 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Odd - wonder what I'm doing wrong then? My result:
>
> Aug 16 10:44:43 auth: Debug: sql(supp...@junkemailfilter.com,127.0.0.1):
> query: SELECT user_name, domain_name, password FROM users WHERE
> user_name = 'support' AND domain_name = 'ju
On 8/16/2010 11:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:49 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/15/2010 3:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
These are available in v2.0:
%{login_user}
%{login_username}
%{login_domain}
I guess they should be added to wiki..
Hi Timo,
I just tried the 2.0 of
You can use checkpassword:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/CheckPassword
Works fine for me for master user authentication.
Emerson Pinter
On 15-08-2010 18:46, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's what I'd like. Limited master users, where someone can be a
master users for some domains but not o
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:49 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> On 8/15/2010 3:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > These are available in v2.0:
> >
> > %{login_user}
> > %{login_username}
> > %{login_domain}
> >
> > I guess they should be added to wiki..
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> I just tried the 2.0 official
On 2010-08-16 13:02:37 -0400, Jerrale G wrote:
> make sure you are using dovecot-2.0-rc6
you mean the final 2.0.0 right?:p
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
On 8/15/2010 3:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
These are available in v2.0:
%{login_user}
%{login_username}
%{login_domain}
I guess they should be added to wiki..
Hi Timo,
I just tried the 2.0 official release and these variables return an
empty string.
Am 16.08.2010 um 19:22 schrieb Marc Perkel:
> No - I'm saying that an upgrade that does exactly the same thing as the
> earlier version should "just work" without having to research cryptic error
> messages you get after the new software fails to load. What I'm saying is
> that Linux should be a
On 16/08/2010 17:58, Jerrale G wrote:
On 8/16/2010 3:44 AM, ramesh wrote:
Hi All,
I would like have suggestion for changing subdomain (belongs to ISP)
to own domain, the scenario as below.
Presently we have subdomain from ISP ( @xxx.isp.net)
email id : ram...@xxx.isp.net
ISP charges
On 8/16/2010 7:37 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:23:50AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Timo's software standards, and mine, are higher than the average open
source project. When an install id done right then you don't have to go
to the wiki for anything. You run it and it ju
> On 08/16/2010 06:46 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> â¦
>> NOTE: This is the UNSTABLE development branch of Dovecot v2.0.
>>
>> ^
>
> See: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051736.html
>
wow ... I was hoping I was the first :-\
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@open
On 8/16/2010 8:22 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
hi,
what os/distro?
darix
make sure you are using dovecot-2.0-rc6
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin
On 8/16/2010 3:44 AM, ramesh wrote:
Hi All,
I would like have suggestion for changing subdomain (belongs to ISP) to own
domain, the scenario as below.
Presently we have subdomain from ISP ( @xxx.isp.net)
email id : ram...@xxx.isp.net
ISP charges huge amount,thou others ISP charges les
On 2010-08-16 10:23 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> That's why people pay for Windows and Macs and more people use it
> than Linux because it just works. You start an upgrade anf click NEXT
> AGREE NEXT NEXT NEXT FINISH and everything just works. That's the way
> Linux should be.
You're not serious?? I
On 08/16/2010 06:46 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
> …
> NOTE: This is the UNSTABLE development branch of Dovecot v2.0.
>
> ^
See: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051736.html
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: cafefeed.1022...@localdomain.org
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
>
> As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
> cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few
> weeks, since there was quite a lot of te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen said the following on 16/08/10 16:49:
> As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
> cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few
> weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing
> SUSE packages are already building and can be found at [1] in a few
> minutes.
forgot to mention:
the package ships with latest pigeonhole aswell.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
Congratulations Timo!:)
SUSE packages are already building and can be found at [1] in a few
minutes.
though the package doesnt try to migrate the config yet. so users have
to do that on their own. :)
darix
[1] http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/
dovecot20
dovecot20-backe
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
>
> As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
> cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be releas
> On 2010-08-16 07:16:46 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>> Maybe dovecot could use the "nobody" user if dovenull doesn't exist?
>
> you could just read the warning message, create the user and stop
> worrying?
>
> and no ... it shouldnt fallback to nobody. a broken set up is a broken
> setup and needs
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
Well, it didn't take long for someone to find the first "bug":
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/2156583b00e2
configure: v2
On 8/16/10 10:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally.
Congratulations, Timo!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
On 16/08/2010 15:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally.
Brilliant work Timo!
Bill
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 11:42 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> hey Marc, you're not alone !!! As well as you, i also expect
> software updates to be always perfect and magic so i dont have to
> have a clue of what i'm real doing, as softwares will take care of all
> the inteligence tha
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few
weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fi
Em 16/08/2010 11:23, Marc Perkel escreveu:
Timo's software standards, and mine, are higher than the average open
source project. When an install id done right then you don't have to
go to the wiki for anything. You run it and it just works. That's why
people pay for Windows and Macs and more
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:23:50AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Timo's software standards, and mine, are higher than the average open
> source project. When an install id done right then you don't have to go
> to the wiki for anything. You run it and it just works. That's why
> people pay for
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 17:56 -0400, Jerrale G wrote:
> I don't know if dovecot 2.0 will have this already or not but, when
> dovecot is stopped or started, it would be nice to have the PID reported
> in the log for various uses.
v2.0 does have it:
master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=3
What do you use now?
On 8/16/2010 6:27 AM, Patrick Domack wrote:
I used a setup like this, to sync mail between 3 different
datacenters, in a multimaster setup.
For this I used unison, running every 28seconds. And it worked well
for two years, before I changed to a better approach. Older ver
On 8/16/2010 4:11 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-08-15 12:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: service(pop3-login) User doesn't
exist: dovenull
Just some real time feedback. I don't know what dovenull user is or
why it is necessary.
It would be a lot smoother (and this
On 2010-08-16 07:16:46 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Maybe dovecot could use the "nobody" user if dovenull doesn't exist?
you could just read the warning message, create the user and stop
worrying?
and no ... it shouldnt fallback to nobody. a broken set up is a broken
setup and needs to be fixed.
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 07:16 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Maybe dovecot could use the "nobody" user if dovenull doesn't exist?
The entire point of dovenull user is that it's not used by anything
else. The only things I'm going to change here is to make the error
message somewhat better for v2.0.1 a
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:31 +0200, Mischa Peters wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a way to define the number for imap-login processes and pop3-login
> processes separately?
>
> My mail server is getting more IMAP clients and much less POP3 clients these
> days and it continues to run out of authen
On 8/16/2010 2:45 AM, William Blunn wrote:
On 15/08/2010 22:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/15/2010 2:32 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-08-15 14:01:25 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Seems to me that it wouldn't take a lot of code to at lease find if
they have adduser or useradd.
that is 2 out of
On Aug 15, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Jim wrote:
On Aug 15, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Seems to me that it wouldn't take a lot of code to at lease find if
they have adduser or useradd.
Or in the case of OS X, dscl...
Documenting this is good, but perhaps the configure script could
chec
Hi All,
Is there a way to define the number for imap-login processes and pop3-login
processes separately?
My mail server is getting more IMAP clients and much less POP3 clients these
days and it continues to run out of authentication processes.
I have been increasing login_max_processes_count t
I used a setup like this, to sync mail between 3 different
datacenters, in a multimaster setup.
For this I used unison, running every 28seconds. And it worked well
for two years, before I changed to a better approach. Older versions
of dovecot didn't like the moves very much (pre 1.0), but
hi,
what os/distro?
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the last mercurial release of dovecot-pigeonhole
2.0 and get this error:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2
-Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/kerberos/include -o
.libs
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Suppose I have users with a default password like "change-my-password"
> and I want to detect users who haven't changed their password and alert
> (nag) them about changing it. How would I do that?
How is this a dovecot question? The answer depends on what you use for
your pas
On 2010-08-15 12:03 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: service(pop3-login) User doesn't
> exist: dovenull
>
> Just some real time feedback. I don't know what dovenull user is or
> why it is necessary.
It would be a lot smoother (and this probably applies to all other
software
On 15/08/2010 22:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/15/2010 2:32 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-08-15 14:01:25 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Seems to me that it wouldn't take a lot of code to at lease find if
they have adduser or useradd.
that is 2 out of many solutions.
and depending of the admin he
On 16.8.2010, at 7.33, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> Would it work to run 'dsync mirror' every minute against either mdbox
> or sdbox mailbox on a dedicated network connection between two (or
> potentially three or four) mail servers? I'm trying to avoid using a
> NAS/SAN or some other dedicated NFS s
66 matches
Mail list logo
