http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz.sig
Largest fixes since rc1:
- Fixed a crash with empty mail_plugins
- Fixed sharing INBOX to other users
- mdbox: Rebuilding storage was broken in rc1
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Am I missing something obvious here ?
Dovecot isn't a SMTP-Server/MTA.
See also: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailServerOverview
That figures ... it had to be my sendmail config of all things.
Geez .. I hate sendmail configuration.
"I hate sendmail configuration"
On 07/09/2010 10:36 PM D F wrote:
> Making all in man
> make: don't know how to make doveadm.1. Stop in
> /home/mail/dovecot-2.0.rc1/doc/man.
Should be fixed now: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/c1f72627d246
RC2, which will contain the fix, should be released withing the next 60
minutes.
R
> Hum, tested it with my fmake in my OpenBSD 4.2, it worked for me. You
s/fmake/gmake/
--
The trapper recommends today: face1e55.1019...@localdomain.org
On 07/09/2010 10:36 PM D F wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm currently doing some tests with Dovecot 2.0 RC1 and OpenBSD4.7 (socppc
> or i386 architectures) and I can't compile it :
> I "./configure" with default options and then "make" :
>
> $ make
> [...]
> Making all in doc
> Making all in man
> mak
Hello all,
I'm currently doing some tests with Dovecot 2.0 RC1 and OpenBSD4.7 (socppc
or i386 architectures) and I can't compile it :
I "./configure" with default options and then "make" :
$ make
[...]
Making all in doc
Making all in man
make: don't know how to make doveadm.1. Stop in
/home/mail/
>> Am I missing something obvious here ?
>>
>
> Yes, Dovecot is not an SMTP server, it provides POP3 and IMAP which are
> for mail retrieval. Common SMTP servers are Exim, Postfix, Sendmail and
> Qmail.
Well that tells me dovecot is working fine but sendmail is not listening
to roaming mail clien
>> Am I missing something obvious here ?
>
> Dovecot isn't a SMTP-Server/MTA.
> See also: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailServerOverview
>
That figures ... it had to be my sendmail config of all things.
Geez .. I hate sendmail configuration.
OKay .. thanks.
--
Dennis
On 07/09/2010 08:33 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> I'm not too sure where to look here. I can access my mail via Dovecot …
> … I can not send. I simply get told that the server would not accept the
> smtp connection. …
>
> Am I missing something obvious here ?
Dovecot isn't a SMTP-Server/MTA.
See a
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I'm not too sure where to look here. I can access my mail via Dovecot and
there is an initial requirement to accept an SSL key ( self signed )
however after I look in my inbox and read a piece of email ( via SeaMonkey
eMail client ) I can not send. I simply get told that the
I'm not too sure where to look here. I can access my mail via Dovecot and
there is an initial requirement to accept an SSL key ( self signed )
however after I look in my inbox and read a piece of email ( via SeaMonkey
eMail client ) I can not send. I simply get told that the server would not
accep
hi,
since Dovecot's deliver is creating folders for the user if needed - is
there also a way of how to set the Spam folder for instance to a mode so
that it can't be deleted by the user through IMAP anymore?
use the autocreate-plugin:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Autocreate
Hi,
since Dovecot's deliver is creating folders for the user if needed - is
there also a way of how to set the Spam folder for instance to a mode so
that it can't be deleted by the user through IMAP anymore?
Thanks
On 07/09/2010 06:46 PM Leander S. wrote:
> Jul 09 18:19:01 deliver(ad...@server.home): Fatal: setgid(2000) failed
> with euid=65534(nobody), gid=143(dovecot), egid=143(dovecot): Operation
> not permitted
see http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#Multiple_UIDs
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends t
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:13 +0200, Leander S. wrote:
server postfix/pipe[1603]: 5A0BE7B6A9: to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=0.64, delays=0.02/0.15/0/0.47, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (temporary failure)
Make sure deliver can write to logs and look at its log files.
ht
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:13 +0200, Leander S. wrote:
server postfix/pipe[1603]: 5A0BE7B6A9: to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=0.64, delays=0.02/0.15/0/0.47, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (temporary failure)
Make sure deliver can write to logs and look at its log files.
ht
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:13 +0200, Leander S. wrote:
> server postfix/pipe[1603]: 5A0BE7B6A9: to=,
> relay=dovecot, delay=0.64, delays=0.02/0.15/0/0.47, dsn=4.3.0,
> status=deferred (temporary failure)
Make sure deliver can write to logs and look at its log files.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#lo
Pascal Volk schrieb:
On 07/08/2010 10:41 PM Leander S. wrote:
…
transport_maps = pgsql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/transport_maps
virtual_transport = dovecot
…
server [~]# postfinger
…
--master.cf--
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=dovecot:dovecot
arg
On 07/08/2010 10:41 PM Leander S. wrote:
> …
> transport_maps = pgsql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/transport_maps
> virtual_transport = dovecot
> …
> server [~]# postfinger
> …
> --master.cf--
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=dovecot:dovecot
> argv=/usr/
On 2010-07-08 12:11, William Blunn wrote:
Exim also has excellent caching for recipient address verification.
Off topic for Dovecot, but probably relevant for this thread: Not as
excellent as you might think. Exim will typically do at least 2
"userdb"-type lookups for each recipient of a messag
Jerry schrieb:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:28:15 +0200
Leander S. articulated:
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
virtual_transport = dovecot
^^ Is in the conf.
1. I'm using maildir.
2. I'm not only having one virutal domain - there is planty of domains running
on this system
so "virtual_ma
On 7/9/10 12:01 AM, "Xavier Pons" wrote:
> I think this new funcionalities would be perfect (necessary ;-) ) for a
> complete load balanced/high availability mail system.
Timo, what you described sounds great.
Pretty much anything built into Dovecot would be an improvement over an
external scr
El 08/07/2010 13:26, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 8.7.2010, at 10.48, Brandon Davidson wrote:
Yes, we will have two hardware balancers in front of proxies. Thus, the
director service will detect failures of backend servers and not forward
sessions them? how detects if a backend server it's ali
On Friday 09 of July 2010 03:07:00 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.7.2010, at 19.57, Ray Kirby wrote:
> > Jul 08 12:35:08 master: Error: service(auth): child 5516 killed with
> > signal 11 (core dumped)
>
> Could you get a gdb backtrace? It said core dumped, so there should be one
> in base_dir (dovec
24 matches
Mail list logo
