So if I want to run dovecot from tcpserver it seems like I can simply run
`pop3-login --ssl` from tcpserver (its sort of like running it from inetd)
and it says it will 'talk to dovecot'. Can I disable all listeners in
dovecot then? Will is still talk to it? Trying some experiments now ...
--Chuck
Sigh,
In the interest of moving forward on this project I've given up trying to
get Dovecot to support mailboxes, rather I've tweaked around in qmail and
had it deliver into a mail directory on a disk, that isn't NFS mounted. That
got me past the various locking complaints and "operation not suppo
On 06/17/2010 05:36 AM Mark Sapiro wrote:
> So the first question is how do I configure rawlog for 2.0beta6?
Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 05:36 AM Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> So the first question is how do I configure rawlog for 2.0beta6?
>
> Also mentioned in the beta releae announcement:
>
On 06/17/2010 05:36 AM Mark Sapiro wrote:
> So the first question is how do I configure rawlog for 2.0beta6?
Sorry for stripping all the stuff, and not digging deeper into it.
There were two changes between beta5 and beta6:
* http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/addb2c6c1dfb
* http://hg.d
The initial problem I was seeing after upgrade from 2.0beta5 to
2.0beta6 was error messages from my Android phone K9 client that
dovecot was reporting -1 messages in various mailboxes. These
mailboxes do have the special "Mail System Internal Data" message in
them.
In trying to get more informatio
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-16 11:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Yes, but Gentoo isn't supplying binaries. The amount of project
time/effort to get all those Debian binaries compiled and out the
door is gargantuan compared to the Gentoo source model.
Ah, forgot about t
Migrated 300+ mailboxes a few days ago (pop->imap and imap->imap) using
imap tools from http://www.athensfbc.com/imap_tools/. Use v1.74 tar
file. The author fixed a date issue. For some reason Dovecot expects
that time format to be 2 characters, so for example 2:10:41 will fail
but 02:10:41 wil
> I couldn't find anything obviously wrong in the code.
Figured it out. The t_pop in client_handle_input was clobbering
imap_clients->command_queue->name. This is because cmd_uid allocated the name
from the wrong pool. Here is a patch to fix it. Forget my other patch (to
imap_refresh_procti
On 16.06.2010 22:16, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-16 1:22 PM, Ed W wrote:
Someone further up the thread says that this is working with Dovecot 2
though? What is different about what D2 is doing vs 1.2.11?
I dunno - all I do know is Timo said there was a TB bug, and I tend to
take his word
Hi,
I've some virtual folders which seem a bit odd when they are listed.
a LIST "virtual.spam." "*"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasNoChildren) "." "virtual.spam."
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "virtual.spam.unchecked"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "virtual.spam.disagree"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "v
On 2010-06-16 2:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2010-06-16 1:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:01 +0200, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
>>>
> I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
> i
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-06-16 1:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:01 +0200, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> >
> >> > I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
> >> > is that the SEARCH command only searches in t
On 2010-06-16 1:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:01 +0200, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
>
>> > I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
>> > is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances.
> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/
On 2010-06-16 1:22 PM, Ed W wrote:
> Someone further up the thread says that this is working with Dovecot 2
> though? What is different about what D2 is doing vs 1.2.11?
I dunno - all I do know is Timo said there was a TB bug, and I tend to
take his word for it.
One thing though - if the OP isn'
On 2010-06-16 1:18 PM, Ed W wrote:
> It seems like a compromise would be for the likes of Debian/Redhat to
> have a clear split between "Apps" and "System" and offer the option to
> stay "fresh but tested" on the apps repo, but "stable and mouldy" on the
> System repo?
Exactly... even gentoo could
> Is it complete garbage or 0xde character? (Or if you don't use
> --with-devel-checks then 0xde shouldn't be appearing.)
It is often 0xde with devel-checks on.
On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM Pascal Volk wrote:
> And the .imap folder is only created when you are using the (obsolete)
> mdbox mailbox format. It has nothing to with the used protocols.
Oh, what's goin on with me?
mdbox would be very fine. But mbox could be the reason for many trouble.
Regards,
Pasc
On 06/16/2010 05:28 PM Chuck McManis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Pascal Volk <
>> what happens when you set:
>>mail_location = mbox:/home/%u/Mailbox:INBOX=/home/%u/Mailbox
>> or:
>>mail_location = mbox:~/Mailbox:INBOX=~/Mailbox
>>
>
> If I set the mailbox location to point to
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 18:22 +0100, Ed W wrote:
>
> Someone further up the thread says that this is working with Dovecot 2
> though? What is different about what D2 is doing vs 1.2.11?
I doubt it's because of Dovecot version. v2.0's replies look correct,
and v1.x will most likely give exactly th
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:01 +0200, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
> is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances.
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/4432650c0699
On 16/06/2010 15:50, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-16 10:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:22 +0200, Bodo Schulz wrote:
And here are a screenshot from the Thunderbird:
http://yfrog.com/j5thunderbirdip
So in TB it doesn't work.
and from Claws: htt
Gentoo supports just as many:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions#Architecture_support
Yes, but Gentoo isn't supplying binaries. The amount of project time/effort
to get all those Debian binaries compiled and out the door is gargantuan
compared to the Gentoo s
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-06-16 1:01 PM, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> > I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
> > is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances. For
> > example:
>
> I'm 99% certain this
On 2010-06-16 1:01 PM, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
> is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances. For
> example:
I'm 99% certain this is by design. Only the first delivered-to header is
considered reliable, not
Hi all,
I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem
is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances. For
example:
1 FETCH 14557 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (Delivered-To)]
* 14557 FETCH (BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DELIVERED-TO)] {85}
Delivered-To: po...@ojjektum.uhul
On 6/16/10 7:07 AM -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Butler put forth on 6/16/2010 6:49 AM:
I will never use debian or its derivatives for its outdated crud, and I
would rather not use RHEL because of its old but patched methods, gentoo
and slackware are the only two serious "Linux" OS's that sho
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I run Debian Stable. If I were to run Debian Testing I'd have much more up to date packages
available. Call me conservative I guess. On a positive note, Debian Stable, as far behind as it
is, has _much_ newer packages than RHEL and some other "stable" or "enterprise"
di
On 16/06/2010 13:07, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Butler put forth on 6/16/2010 6:49 AM:
I will never use debian or its derivatives for its outdated crud, and I
would rather not use RHEL because of its old but patched methods, gentoo
and slackware are the only two serious "Linux" OS's that sho
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I run Debian Stable. If I were to run Debian Testing I'd have much more up to date packages
available. Call me conservative I guess. On a positive note, Debian Stable, as far behind as it
is, has _much_ newer packages than RHEL and some other "stable" or "enterprise"
di
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I run Debian Stable. If I were to run Debian Testing I'd have much more up to date packages
available. Call me conservative I guess. On a positive note, Debian Stable, as far behind as it
is, has _much_ newer packages than RHEL and some other "stable" or "enterprise"
di
On 2010-06-16 11:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Yes, but Gentoo isn't supplying binaries. The amount of project
> time/effort to get all those Debian binaries compiled and out the
> door is gargantuan compared to the Gentoo source model.
Ah, forgot about that... its amazing how you get used to the
On Jun 8, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 02:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On ti, 2010-06-08 at 14:20 +0200, Philippe Chevalier wrote:
>>
>>> dovecot: IMAP(@domain.org): Corrupted transaction log file
>>> /home//Mail/Maildir/INBOX/dovecot.index.log seq 13: record size too
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:19 AM, William Blunn
> wrote:
> [snip]... . With Maildir, everything works out-of-the-box with no
> configuration without breaking a sweat; mailbox corruption is simply
> designed-out.
>
> Bill
>
I may end up and go back to a maildir implementation, that would at least
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:46 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
> > (random 2.0 bug report, unless you set info_log_path
> > in conf.d/10-logging the additonal information doesn't come out)
>
> With or without setting log_path? If you didn't set lo
Chuck McManis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:44 AM, William Blunn
wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:28 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
Jun 16 08:22:07 eeebox dovecot: pop3(cmcmanis): Error: user cmcmanis:
Initialization failed: Initializing mail s
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/16/2010 7:18 AM:
> On 2010-06-16 7:56 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> For this last minor bug, I was a one percenter, had the right
>> combination--slow hardware plus mbox storage and full text
>> searches on very large mbox files.
>
> Right, now I remember...
>
> So, it
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:46 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
> (random 2.0 bug report, unless you set info_log_path
> in conf.d/10-logging the additonal information doesn't come out)
With or without setting log_path? If you didn't set log_path, it goes to
syslog and maybe to a different file (or maybe
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:44 AM, William Blunn
> wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:28 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Jun 16 08:22:07 eeebox dovecot: pop3(cmcmanis): Error: user cmcmanis:
>>> Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location
>>> s
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:28 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
> >
> > Jun 16 08:22:07 eeebox dovecot: pop3(cmcmanis): Error: user cmcmanis:
> > Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location
> setting
> > failed: mbox: mbox ro
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:28 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
Jun 16 08:22:07 eeebox dovecot: pop3(cmcmanis): Error: user cmcmanis:
Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting
failed: mbox: mbox root directory can't be a file: /home/cmcmanis/Mail
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/16/2010 7:16 AM:
> On 2010-06-16 7:52 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> The point is that waiting a few days or weeks after a release for the
>> other guinea pigs to find the problems doesn't always guarantee you
>> won't run into a bug, as I describe above.
>
> True, of co
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:28 -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
>
> Jun 16 08:22:07 eeebox dovecot: pop3(cmcmanis): Error: user cmcmanis:
> Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting
> failed: mbox: mbox root directory can't be a file: /home/cmcmanis/Mailbox (
> http://wik
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Pascal Volk <
user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.org
> wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 07:26 AM Chuck McManis wrote:
> > …
> > I've got qmail delivering into a file named 'Mailbox' in user's home
> > directories.
>^^^
> >
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42, bmfr wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I'm using a thrid party IMAP client (can not disclose
> its name) and testing with other IMAP clients work. I'm wondering if you had
> an idea of what could trigger this LOGOUT msg from the client and if it
> could
On 2010-06-16 10:42 AM, bmfr wrote:
> I'm using a thrid party IMAP client (can not disclose
> its name)
? wtf
> I'm wondering if you had an idea of what could trigger this LOGOUT
> msg from the client and if it could be something I could fix from the
> server side.
Yes absolutely (can not disclo
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 21:04 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> >> 6 imap0x000105867333
> >> imap_refresh_proctitle + 218 ->
> >> 7 imap0x0001058666ce
> >> cmd_sync_continue + 199 ->
> >
> > But how does this happen? Did it opti
On 2010-06-16 10:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:22 +0200, Bodo Schulz wrote:
>> And here are a screenshot from the Thunderbird:
>> http://yfrog.com/j5thunderbirdip
>
> So in TB it doesn't work.
>
>> and from Claws: http://yfrog.com/5hclawsxp
>
> And it Claws it works. Cle
Arne, Timo
Really helpful suggestions. Thanks!
imapsync looks like it will do the job - I think I can get the two servers to
co-exist on the same server, so bandwidth issue will be minimised. Presumably
also it will negate the need to convert each user to having just MailDir
directories befo
On 2010-06-16 9:44 AM, jason hirsh wrote:
>> Newly delivered messages go into /new. When the first client 'sees'
>> them, they get moved to /cur...
> for my education.. when are they removed from cur??
When you move or delete them.
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hi Phil,
Thanks for your reply, I'm using a thrid party IMAP client (can not disclose
its name) and testing with other IMAP clients work. I'm wondering if you had
an idea of what could trigger this LOGOUT msg from the client and if it
could be something I could fix from the server side.
Thank y
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:19 +0200, Oliver Eales wrote:
> Am 19.05.2010 10:51, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> > As http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS describes, the main problem with NFS has
> > always been caching problems. One NFS client changes two files, but another
> > NFS client sees only one of the chan
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:49 +0100, Gavin Lawrie wrote:
> I had a look on the Dovecot Wiki and under migration are discussions
> about various other mail systems, but I don't know enough about these
> to tell if they would also apply to CGP.
I don't know what CGP's mboxes and maildirs look like. If
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:22, bmfr wrote:
> I've set up Dovecot to use my signed SSL certificate and IMAP client is
> using STARTTLS on port 143 without secure authentication.
>
> The TLS negociation process seems to go through ok but once the negociation
> is finished the client sends an IMAP L
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:22 +0200, Bodo Schulz wrote:
> 59 lsub "" "Shared Folders.*"
Here it first lists all subscribed mailboxes.
> 60 list "" "Shared Folders.%"
> 61 list "" "Shared Folders.%.%"
Here it gets the first and second level mailboxes. (This is actually a
good idea to it this way.)
Hi All,
I've set up Dovecot to use my signed SSL certificate and IMAP client is
using STARTTLS on port 143 without secure authentication.
The TLS negociation process seems to go through ok but once the negociation
is finished the client sends an IMAP LOGOUT message; he does not try to
authentic
Onsdag 16 juni 2010 15:49:09 skrev Gavin Lawrie :
> Apologies if this is in the archive - did look but couldn't find it.
>
> Does anyone have any experience of migrating from CommunigatePro to
> Dovecot?
>
> We currently run CGP 5.3.4, supporting a small system (20 or so users, one
> domain). W
Am 16.06.2010 10:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 16.06.2010 10:22, schrieb Bodo Schulz:
>> Am 15.06.2010 14:34, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 13:11 +0200, Bodo Schulz wrote:
>>>
At this moment we have problems with access to the Public Folders.
(We use as Client the
Apologies if this is in the archive - did look but couldn't find it.
Does anyone have any experience of migrating from CommunigatePro to Dovecot?
We currently run CGP 5.3.4, supporting a small system (20 or so users, one
domain). We've been using it for years, and have a mixed bag of MailDir
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-16 9:14 AM, jason hirsh wrote:
It may just be impression.. I knew people weren't getting email even
though The maillog seemed to indicate that POSTFIX was receiving and
putting in que i just assumed the "lost" messages were these
me
On 06/16/2010 07:26 AM Chuck McManis wrote:
> …
> I've got qmail delivering into a file named 'Mailbox' in user's home
> directories.
^^^
> …
> So, I can't get dovecot to work at all. In an unusual turn about I got the
> SSL stuff working but not t
On 2010-06-16 9:14 AM, jason hirsh wrote:
> It may just be impression.. I knew people weren't getting email even
> though The maillog seemed to indicate that POSTFIX was receiving and
> putting in que i just assumed the "lost" messages were these
> messages
>
> I guess I was wrong
Newly deliver
Am 19.05.2010 10:51, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
As http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS describes, the main problem with NFS has always
been caching problems. One NFS client changes two files, but another NFS client
sees only one of the changes, which Dovecot then assumes is caused by
corruption.
host
On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 17:19, jason hirsh wrote:
I am running dovecot 1.1.7 with postfix 2.6.5. Ihad a server down
issue and when it rebooted the IPFW firewalll on my FReebsd server
prevented mail from being delivered..at least thatis what
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 17:19, jason hirsh wrote:
> I am running dovecot 1.1.7 with postfix 2.6.5. Ihad a server down issue and
> when it rebooted the IPFW firewalll on my FReebsd server prevented mail from
> being delivered..at least thatis what I think the issue was... when i stopped
> IPFW
On 2010-06-16 8:07 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> That's an interesting position/observation given that RHEL, SLES, and CentOS
> (RHEL derivative) have the largest datacenter footprint in the US by far.
> Across both oceans, mainly Europe and South America, SuSE rules pretty much
> everything, from wha
On 2010-06-16 7:56 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> For this last minor bug, I was a one percenter, had the right
> combination--slow hardware plus mbox storage and full text
> searches on very large mbox files.
Right, now I remember...
So, its working well for you now I presume (since you're still her
On 2010-06-16 7:52 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The point is that waiting a few days or weeks after a release for the
> other guinea pigs to find the problems doesn't always guarantee you
> won't run into a bug, as I describe above.
True, of course... I think babies should be required to have 'There
Noel Butler put forth on 6/16/2010 6:49 AM:
> I will never use debian or its derivatives for its outdated crud, and I
> would rather not use RHEL because of its old but patched methods, gentoo
> and slackware are the only two serious "Linux" OS's that should ever be
> in a serious data centre, IMH
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/16/2010 6:34 AM:
> On 2010-06-16 7:29 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> Once I installed it I almost immediately found problems with
>>> performance. I reported the symptoms here, and within a day or two
>>> Timo identified the cause relating to mbox processing and fixed
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:49 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> dovecot in mainstream, but hey, he still prefers sendmail over postfix,
> which is fine for system only users, but most of us do a lot more, and
> Claus has told me directly they will never support MySQL so we removed
Just want to clarify,
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/16/2010 6:29 AM:
> On 2010-06-16 1:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Charles Marcus put forth on 6/15/2010 12:44 PM:
>>
>>> Waiting almost always keeps me from any major bugs from new packages
>>> (one exception was a minor update to mailman that changed directory
>>> loc
caution OS war related statements within :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:29 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> We are not in disagreement, we just apparently do things differently. I
> prefer the 'rolling release' type of system that always has *everything*
> reasonably up to date, and gentoo gives me
We're drifting quite OT here, but...
On 06/16/2010 08:29 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Again - this is why I have never been inclined to even give debian a
> try... with gentoo, with a very few minor exceptions, the most I've ever
> had to wait was a few weeks...
>
If you want newer releases, yo
On 2010-06-16 7:29 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Once I installed it I almost immediately found problems with
>> performance. I reported the symptoms here, and within a day or two
>> Timo identified the cause relating to mbox processing and fixed it.
>> It took a couple/three weeks IIRC before the
On 2010-06-16 1:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Charles Marcus put forth on 6/15/2010 12:44 PM:
>
>> Waiting almost always keeps me from any major bugs from new packages
>> (one exception was a minor update to mailman that changed directory
>> locations), and still lets me stay up to date with the l
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:50:26PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 15:07 +0200, Wolfram Greinert wrote:
> > > acl_shared_dict = file:/var/lib/dovecot/acl_dict
> >
> > I try this, no success :-(
> >
> > chmod 0777 /var/lib/dovecot
> > touch /var/lib/dovecot/acl_dict
> > chown d
net, i see all Public Folders, right.
>
>>> Now, i have testet with rawlogs an switch on the debugging in
>>> Thunderbird, but a have no more idea! :-(
>>
>> Would have also been useful if you posted the rawlog..
>
> Here he comes:
> ,-
the debugging in
>> Thunderbird, but a have no more idea! :-(
>
> Would have also been useful if you posted the rawlog..
Here he comes:
,--
==> dovecot.rawlog/20100616-101322-9879.in <==
DONE
56 lsub &q
Am 15.06.2010 14:13, schrieb Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
> On 06/15/2010 08:11 AM, Bodo Schulz wrote:
>> When i want subscribe Folders, i have no access to folder are deeper as
>> second level!
>>
>
> I've seen this with Thunderbird 3.x (it worked fine with 2.x). I suppose
> it's a Thunderbird bug. T
79 matches
Mail list logo
