Pascal,
On 5/31/10 11:40 PM, "Pascal Volk"
wrote:
>
> I've spent some time for the fine manual. Whats new?
>
> Location: http://hg.localdomain.org/dovecot-2.0-man
> So I don't have to flood the wiki with attachments.
> As soon as the manual pages are complete, they will be included in the
> Dove
I've spent some time for the fine manual. Whats new?
Location: http://hg.localdomain.org/dovecot-2.0-man
So I don't have to flood the wiki with attachments.
As soon as the manual pages are complete, they will be included in the
Dovecot source tree.
Additional manual pages:
* doveconf(1)
*
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:17:35PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On ma, 2010-05-31 at 21:53 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
> > > Finally I've some time to look at this. Can you still reliably reproduce
> > > this every time?
> >
> > Yes, even if I upload the messages into a new mbox. Done some tes
Il 31/05/2010 03:07, gbot...@emailforall.no-ip.org ha scritto:
hi, Simone Caruso, thanks for your answer but i have some questions i
test the script in the console and he works he read the quota pased by
mysql and then quota_rule ok but he update the maildirsize file??? and this
script have to
Timo,
On 5/31/10 6:56 PM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
>
> Oh, you're right. For auth settings currently only protocol blocks work. It
> was a bit too much trouble to make local/remote blocks to work. :)
That's too bad! Any hope of getting support for this and
director+proxy_maybe anytime soon?
-Bra
On 1.6.2010, at 2.44, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> It still seems to
> ignore the block and only use the global definition, even if doveconf -f
> lip= shows that it's expanding it properly.
Oh, you're right. For auth settings currently only protocol blocks work. It was
a bit too much trouble to mak
Timo,
On 5/31/10 5:34 PM, "Brandon Davidson" wrote:
>
> Still not sure why it's not proxying though. The config looks good but it's
> still using PAM even for the external IP.
I played with subnet masks instead of IPs and using remote instead of local,
as well as setting auth_cache_size = 0, bu
t;
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x3a4fe8] ->
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_stream_seek+0x7e) [0x3c0a4e] ->
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/libd
May 31 16:33:06 sbh16 dovecot: master: Error: service(imap): child 7342 killed
with signal 6 (core dumps disabled)
20100531-162632-
Timo,
On 5/31/10 5:09 PM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
>
> Right .. it doesn't work exactly like that I guess. Or I don't remember :)
> Easiest to test with:
>
> doveconf -f lip=128.223.142.138 -n
That looks better:
[r...@cc-popmap7 ~]# doveconf -f lip=128.223.142.138 -h |grep -B1 -A7 passdb
}
pass
On 1.6.2010, at 0.59, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> Interestingly enough, if I run 'doveconf -n' it doesn't seem to be retaining
> the order I specified. The local section is dropped down to the very end:
Right .. it doesn't work exactly like that I guess. Or I don't remember :)
Easiest to test with
Timo,
On 5/31/10 4:36 PM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
>
> The passdbs and userdbs are checked in the order they're defined. You could
> add them at the bottom. Or probably more easily:
>
> local 128.223.143.138 {
> passdb {
> driver = sql
> args = ..
> }
>
> passdb {
> driver = pam
>
On 1.6.2010, at 0.30, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> May 31 16:20:42 cc-popmap7 dovecot: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in
> configuration file. PLAIN mechanism needs one
Hmm. Maybe this check should check also the local etc. blocks..
> So I added a global passdb/userdb:
The passdbs and userdbs a
Timo,
On 5/31/10 4:13 PM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
> You need to put the other passdb/userdb to the external IP:
>
> local 1.2.3.4 {
>> userdb {
>> driver = passwd
>> }
>> passdb {
>> driver = sql
>> args = /etc/dovecot/proxy-sqlite.conf
>> }
>
> }
>
It still doesn't seem to work. I tried t
On 31.5.2010, at 23.59, Brandon Davidson wrote:
You need to put the other passdb/userdb to the external IP:
local 1.2.3.4 {
> userdb {
> driver = passwd
> }
> passdb {
> driver = sql
> args = /etc/dovecot/proxy-sqlite.conf
> }
}
> Even if the alternate passdb worked, how would I get it to co
Timo,
On 5/31/10 6:04 AM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
> Well .. maybe you could use separate services. Have the proxy listen on
> public IP and the backend listen on localhost. Then you can do:
>
> local_ip 127.0.0.1 {
> passdb {
> ..
> }
> }
>
> and things like that. I think it would work,
On 31.5.2010, at 23.45, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I am having problems setting up rawlog. I need some help.
Oh, right, I forgot. With v2.0 it's different.
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-December/045139.html (just remove the
/tmp/test.sh from the example)
On 5/31/2010 2:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 31.5.2010, at 22.41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> What I don't understand is whether this is strictly the client's
>> problem, or if there is some issue in Dovecot as well. If there is
>> a Dovecot issue, I can try to collect and report more information
On 31.5.2010, at 22.31, stefan novak wrote:
> is this proxy working for lmtp too?
Not yet, but it's probably less than 50 lines of code.
> is there a roadmap when this will
> be released and considered as stable?
Hopefully by the time v2.0.0 is released. It should already be usable with two
pr
On 31.5.2010, at 22.41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> What I don't understand is whether this is strictly the client's
> problem, or if there is some issue in Dovecot as well. If there is a
> Dovecot issue, I can try to collect and report more information about
> these Panics if that would be helpful.
All
On Monday, May 10, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On Sat Apr 24 12:27:40 EEST 2010, Juergen Daubert wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:14:28PM +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> got the following with beta4 while uploading messages from a local
>>> mbox to the dovecot server in my LAN, test
this feature sounds very interesting...
is this proxy working for lmtp too? is there a roadmap when this will
be released and considered as stable?
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 21:53 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
> > Finally I've some time to look at this. Can you still reliably reproduce
> > this every time?
>
> Yes, even if I upload the messages into a new mbox. Done some tests
> right now, one thing I've noticed is that the crash only happens if
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:55:48PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On ma, 2010-03-29 at 14:14 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
>
> > got the following with beta4 while uploading messages from a local
> > mbox to the dovecot server in my LAN, tested with mutt and sylpheed,
> > the same action works wi
On ma, 2010-03-29 at 14:14 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
> got the following with beta4 while uploading messages from a local
> mbox to the dovecot server in my LAN, tested with mutt and sylpheed,
> the same action works with 1.2.11:
>
>
> Mar 29 13:42:46 [dovecot] imap(juergen): Panic: strea
On ti, 2010-04-06 at 06:19 +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
> Apr 06 05:44:36 imap(pvo): Error: file_dotlock_open() failed with file
> /home/pvo/mdbox/mailboxes/Trash/S4/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.log: No such file
> or directory
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/3efe9dcbed3e
It also triggere
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 19:53 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> > - service name when logging %s in login_log_format_elements
> >
> Correlates with the first one; "managesieve"
If everything except process and binary name is now "sieve", and %s
expands to "sieve" in auth process also, I'd say this is
On Mon, May 31 2010, Julien Danjou wrote:
> My bad, Timo. It does work on some mailboxes actually.
>
> It seems I've some mailbox (even in the same directory) that are
> different and where it does not work, but I don't know why yet.
Answer is that I missed the `dovecot-shared' files in the direc
On la, 2010-04-24 at 14:45 +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Apr 24 14:35:09 spectre dovecot: imap(t...@leuxner.net):
> rename(/var/vmail/leuxner.net/tlx/mdbox/dovecot-uidvalidity,
> /var/vmail/leuxner.net/tlx/mdbox/dovecot-uidvalidity) failed: No such file or
> directory
http://hg.dovecot.org/dov
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, what parts should now be called managesieve and what parts sieve?
There are at least:
- process name (clearly managesieve)
Yeah.
- service name for auth lookups
"sieve" as by the draft spec (page 12):
`The service name specified by this protocol's profile
On Mon, May 31 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Actually a side effect of that change is that it also changes
> PERMANENTFLAGS. Dovecot's PERMANENTFLAGS handling is a bit stupid now I
> guess. It either has all or nothing.
My bad, Timo. It does work on some mailboxes actually.
It seems I've some mai
On to, 2010-05-13 at 10:14 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
> So this means we cannot create a mail subfolder whose name is "dbox-Mails"!
Yes. That's why it's called dbox-Mails, it's unlikely people will want
to try to create it :)
> I concede that this eventuality may be unlikely, but when designing
On to, 2010-05-20 at 14:26 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Chris Laif wrote:
> >
> > I'm using dovecot 2.0.beta5 (IMAP and LMTP+sieve) and I'm getting lots
> > of errors like this:
> >
> > Warning: /data/mail/4567/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry
> > at lin
Mmmm.
Will try again with other client...
Strange because it happes after using mail for a while...
Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
Consultor CRM - Ingeniero en
Informática
M. +34 607814276
El lun, 31-05-2010 a las 17:01 +0100, Timo S
On 2010-05-31 12:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On ma, 2010-05-31 at 11:57 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2010-05-31 11:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On su, 2010-05-30 at 14:04 -0400, David wrote:
passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow: stat() failed:
Permission denied
>>
>>> A
On Mon, May 31 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Actually a side effect of that change is that it also changes
> PERMANENTFLAGS. Dovecot's PERMANENTFLAGS handling is a bit stupid now I
> guess. It either has all or nothing.
I've tried the patch applying it on dovecot 1.2.11. Unfortunately, the
mailbox
On pe, 2010-05-28 at 16:00 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > If non-Dovecot MUAs modify mbox simultaneously (except appends by MDA
> > are ok), Dovecot might not notice those changes immediately and it might
> > log some errors sometimes.
>
> So it's the same caveat as with mbox_dirty_syncs = yes.
On la, 2010-05-29 at 15:30 +0200, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote:
> And about the command you said. There are lots!
> ...
> * 12337 FETCH (UID 12337 FLAGS (Junk) INTERNALDATE "29-May-2010 15:21:01
> +0200")
> * 12338 FETCH (UID 12338 FLAGS () INTERNALDATE "29-May-2010 15:21:23
> +0200")
..
So Dovec
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 11:57 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-31 11:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On su, 2010-05-30 at 14:04 -0400, David wrote:
> >> passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow: stat() failed:
> >> Permission denied
>
> > According to your dovecot -n output auth process
On su, 2010-05-30 at 10:12 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> As we
> have seen earlier, fully changing the protocol name from "managesieve"
> to "sieve" is a bad idea, for one because it causes much confusion.
>
> Timo, can you take a look at this?
Well, what parts should now be called managesieve
On 2010-05-31 11:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On su, 2010-05-30 at 14:04 -0400, David wrote:
>> passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow: stat() failed:
>> Permission denied
> According to your dovecot -n output auth process runs as root.
? I guess I'm blind Timo - how did you determine this
On la, 2010-05-29 at 11:47 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> That's the order they appeared in my logfile. I'm assuming they were all
> sent to deliver at the same time, they all thought they needed to make the
> directory, the one with msgid
> 20100529070110.17a781b5...@mail-out02.xecu.net was able t
I did a yum install and a yum update and that is what centos installed
how do I get a newer version
Sent from David's iPhone
On May 31, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Charles Marcus Brokers.com> wrote:
On 2010-05-30 2:04 PM, David wrote:
Dovecot -n output
# 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
You really should
On su, 2010-05-30 at 14:04 -0400, David wrote:
> passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow: stat() failed: Permission
> denied
According to your dovecot -n output auth process runs as root. So this
can only mean that SELinux disallows reading the file.
On 2010-05-30 2:04 PM, David wrote:
> Dovecot -n output
> # 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
You really should upgrade, especially if you're just starting out...
1.0.7 is really, really really old, current is 1.2.11, and 2.0 is now in
beta - way too many improvements to go into, just do it.
> socket:
>
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 05:02 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> > So instead of having separate proxies and mail servers, have only hybrids
> > everywhere? I guess it would almost work, except proxy_maybe isn't yet
> > compatible with director. That's actually a bit annoying to implement.. You
> > coul
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 13:26 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > I think the main bug is that maildir is thought to be read-only. IMAP
> > ACL RFC says READ-ONLY shouldn't be returned unless nothing can be
> > changed. Does this help?
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/c2c1639b91ee
>
> It will no
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 13:02 +0300, Greg Pearson wrote:
> would it be possible to prevent users who try to login from an
> unresolved IP from connecting to Dovecot IMAP?
Sounds like a bad idea. There are legitimate users sometimes connecting
from IPs that don't have DNS names. And sometimes DNS is
Timo,
After straightening out some issues with Axel's spec file, I'm back to
poking at this.
On 5/25/10 3:14 PM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
> So instead of having separate proxies and mail servers, have only hybrids
> everywhere? I guess it would almost work, except proxy_maybe isn't yet
> compatibl
thanks for your answer.
There is only 1 Account in Mail.app
I have imigratet from Courier and there I had no Problem with all the settings.
Is it possible that the index file is damaged or something like that ?
Gerhard
Am 28.05.10 17:56, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 10:
On Tue, May 25 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 16:44 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
>> However, when selecting the mailbox, system flags are not announced as
>> permanent but only as session flags:
>
> Yeah, that's a bug I guess..
>
>> 3445 OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed.
> ..
>
Hi,
would it be possible to prevent users who try to login from an
unresolved IP from connecting to Dovecot IMAP?
I have a suspicion that it should be done via the authentication module
(ie PAM) but I am not sure (if this is the case could someone recommend
a good resource or even a solution).
Hi,
i think ive asked it before
perhaps this feature can be included in dovecot2
couldnt get it run with dovecot 1.2.x
if i use the postfixadmin superuser,domainadmin,domainuser layout
so there are domainadmins defined in a sql table
it would be a nice feature to break it down to be master only a
Hi, sorry if this was asked before and/or
if there is allready a solution
different imap mail clients, have different imap folder naming
conventions typical by sent , trash, spam
i normally use thunderbird conventions, as its working on all major
plattforms and configure hord/imp , squirrelmail to
Hi,
2010/5/30 Andrzej Adam Filip :
> It depends on what you want:
> a) dirty&ugly but *trivial* "hack" serving your very specific
> requirement that can "make troubles" after some change in
> pattern of use
> b) simple solution
well, I don't see a real difference. As far as I know, and as Ti
54 matches
Mail list logo
