Re: [Dovecot] Busy looping of 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD-current

2010-03-27 Thread Scott Ellis
On 3/26/2010 10:05 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: On 26.3.2010, at 4.47, Scott Ellis wrote: But it's not hanging anyway, just eating all CPU? I guess it's calling some IO_WRITE callback all the time. You could make it do something like: Yeah, functionally the imap process seems to be just fine. It's j

Re: [Dovecot] convert v1.2 config to v2.0

2010-03-27 Thread Pascal Volk
On 03/27/2010 04:47 PM Odhiambo Washington wrote: > How do I convert a version 1.2.x config into a v2.0 config? Some command? > /path/to/doveconf -n -c /old/dovecot.conf > dovecot.conf.new Check the warnings about obsolete settings and adjust if needed in the new configuration file. Regards, P

[Dovecot] convert v1.2 config to v2.0

2010-03-27 Thread Odhiambo Washington
How do I convert a version 1.2.x config into a v2.0 config? Some command? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 HG 11014: Crashes on parsing settings via LMTP service

2010-03-27 Thread Pascal Volk
Crashes when the lmtp process has delivered the first message and receives the LHLO in the 2nd connection for the 2nd message. Backtrace is attached. Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: decade.1008...@localdomain.org Continuing. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x7f0a6a

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Mar 27, 2010, at 3:59 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.3.2010, at 12.32, Patrick Wallura wrote: What about dovedevil and doveangel. Sorry just kidding Even if not, the problem with those is that the name is longer than 8 characters, which makes them not show up in all ps outputs. doveu

Re: [Dovecot] Question about SASL auth

2010-03-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Timo Sirainen wrote: >On 27.3.2010, at 6.43, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Mar 6 07:06:20 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[30273]: warning: SASL: Connect to >> private/auth failed: Resource temporarily unavailable > >Ah

Re: [Dovecot] INBOX. namespace

2010-03-27 Thread Brian Candler
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 03:54:48AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > but when I do 'examine inbox' I see it has been munged: > .. > > 30362 imap NAMI > > "/mail/0/6/37/30/briandev.example.comev.example.com/tmp" > > Oh. This should fix it: > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/0cf38dcd8ced

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 changset 11014 dict: Panic: file driver-mysql.c

2010-03-27 Thread e-frog
Hi, With the latest hg version I see panics with dict process whenever a message is received via lmtp. This didn't happen with the original beta4 release. Mar 27 11:45:51 ubuntu-test dovecot: dict: mysql: Connected to localhost (mails) Mar 27 11:45:51 ubuntu-test postfix/lmtp[5261]: 0F22B27F0D: t

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 HG 11014: Crashes on parsing settings via LMTP service

2010-03-27 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Steps to reproduce failure: a) do fresh start of Dovecot instance b) fire mail to myself via mail-client (not crashed yet), reply to my own mail afterwards (crashes 100%) Does not make a difference whether using Unix or Inet sockets for the LMTP part. Hope that helps to narrow down… Thomas

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 27.3.2010, at 12.32, Patrick Wallura wrote: > What about dovedevil and doveangel. Sorry just kidding Even if not, the problem with those is that the name is longer than 8 characters, which makes them not show up in all ps outputs.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Patrick Wallura
Am 25.03.2010 19:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen: I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is though. Two more ideas: "dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of lovenest :) What about dovedev

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/27/2010 2:18 AM: > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 02:10 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> Maybe the native english speakers (and I'd think only a subset of them >>> too). I had never heard of dovetail. >> >> I'm guessing that's because you're not a woodworker, or know any. ;) It

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 HG 11014: Crashes on parsing settings via LMTP service

2010-03-27 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 27.03.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 27.3.2010, at 9.19, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > >> Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Connect from local >> Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Panic: file settings-parser.c: >> line 1501 (settings_link_get_new): assertion failed:

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 HG 11014: Crashes on parsing settings via LMTP service

2010-03-27 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 27.3.2010, at 9.19, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Connect from local > Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Panic: file settings-parser.c: > line 1501 (settings_link_get_new): assertion failed: (diff + > sizeof(*old_link->array) <= old_link->pare

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Noel Butler
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM: > > > Nice Marco... > > OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P > > I fear anything with "null" in it will be confusing to people > not-in-the-know. The average OP may

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta4 HG 11014: Crashes on parsing settings via LMTP service

2010-03-27 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Hi, unfortunately no core was dumped. Let me know if you need more info to debug. ==> /var/log/dovecot.log <== Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Connect from local Mar 27 08:13:38 spectre dovecot: lmtp(8362): Panic: file settings-parser.c: line 1501 (settings_link_get_new): assertion

[Dovecot] dovecot user

2010-03-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Sorry, meant this to go to the list. Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/27/2010 12:08 AM: > On 27.3.2010, at 6.49, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >>> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free >>> of pornographic associations either. :) >> >> No, no, totally free of pornographic co