Am 17.03.2010 17:45 schrieb Ivica Glavocic:
> Can i use Managesieve patch for Dovecot v1.2.10
> on new Dovecot version v1.2.11
at least: it compiles ;-)
I will try these days
--
Andreas Schulze
Internetdienste | P532
DATEV eG
90329 Nürnberg | Telefon +49 911 319-0 | Telefax +49 911 319-3196
E-Ma
On 3/16/2010 11:08 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> mail_location = mbox:~/mail:CONTROL=~/:SUBSCRIPTIONS=.mailboxlist
>
> This works, because the only control file that mbox uses is the
> subscriptions file. In future this might cause some trouble if some
> other mbox control files show up..
This seem
On 03/17/2010 11:24 PM Papp Tamás wrote:
> …
> The problem is that the mailbox is almost empty:
> $ du -sh .
> 228K.
>
> But the quota usage show something else:
>
> mysql> select bytes,messages from quota where username='';
> +---+--+
> | bytes | messages |
> +---
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.11.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.11.tar.gz.sig
mbox users really should upgrade, because by sending a message with a
huge header you could basically cause a DoS (this problem exists only
w
On 3/17/2010 2:59 PM, Edgar Fuß wrote:
These web servers also use the nullfs mount which is actually a NFS
mount via the host machine to get the content that it serves to the
reverse proxy.
But Web servers usually don't delete or rename files, do they?
Some can depending on whether any
hi All!
Dovecot's version is 1.2.11-0~auto+0 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ .
dovecot.conf:
dict {
quota = mysql:/data/apps/dovecot/dict-sql.conf
#expire = db:/var/lib/dovecot/expire.db
}
/data/apps/dovecot/dict-sql.conf:
connect = host=127.0.0.1 dbname=db user=user password=pw
map
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:15 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> From the wiki and from the
>> thread, it sounds like this just affects index files. One thing I
>> didn't see in the thread (though it'd be easy to miss in a thread that
>> long) is w
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:45 +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > userdb {
> >driver = passwd
> > }
> > userdb {
> >args = /etc/passwd
> >driver = passwd-file
> > }
..
> userdb {
>driver = passwd
>args = /etc/passwd
> }
>
>
> Is there really a need for 2 userdb config groups?
No,
On 17/03/10 21:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Recent hg versions convert v1.2 configs to v2.0 configs automatically.
That is what it outputs with your config:
auth_mechanisms = digest-md5 cram-md5 ntlm login plain
passdb {
args = /etc/cram.pwd
driver = passwd-file
}
service auth {
unix_lis
On 17/03/10 21:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thanks Timo, so I suppose the daily snapshot should be better for me.
So do you mean you really tried beta3 release, not the nightly
snapshot / hg version? Because I thought that error didn't happen with
beta3.
Yes, I really tried beta3
I am also usin
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:27 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> I'll definitely keep that in mind. I should be able to keep things
> pretty segregated in terms of POP3 alone or IMAP alone but my big
> worry is that Courier POP3+Dovecot IMAP scenario.
I know a large installation that was (is?) using Dov
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tony Rutherford wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> * Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
>>> I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
>>>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:21 +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >> dovecot_delivery transport output: lda: Fatal: User lookup failed:
> >> net_connect_unix(/opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such
> >> file or directory
> >
> > Yeah, I broke this yesterday. Fixed it today.
> >
>
> Thanks T
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:19 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> Since Exim wouldn't be touching the index files, is it safe to leave
> exim as-is and let it handle the deliveries to the maildirs natively?
> Exim's already got access to everything it needs including the quota.
> I just want to make sure I
On 17/03/10 21:11, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:09 +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
dovecot_delivery transport output: lda: Fatal: User lookup failed:
net_connect_unix(/opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such
file or directory
Yeah, I broke this yesterday. Fixed it
Oops, forgot to ask one other thing
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> * Exim: We currently deliver all of our mail via Exim on separate
>> servers. Our POP3/IMAP servers only do POP3/IMAP and the Exim mail
>> servers deliver
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:09 +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
> dovecot_delivery transport output: lda: Fatal: User lookup failed:
> net_connect_unix(/opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such
> file or directory
Yeah, I broke this yesterday. Fixed it today.
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:15 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >> * Our #1 main motivation for looking Dovecot is relief for our
> >> currently overtaxed NFS servers, mostly in the form of the index
> >> files. Benchmarking dovecot looks great, even with the index files in
> >> the maildir.
> >
> > Have
Hello,
I tried to install dovecot 2.0 beta3 and deliver seems to look for its
config file in unusual places.
In my exim logs, I get:
010-03-17 13:39:24 [31257] 1NrsWt-0004T0-1K :
dovecot_delivery transport output: lda: Fatal: User lookup failed:
net_connect_unix(/opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovec
On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
Yes, hopefully it's coming soon :)
* Our #1 main motivation for lo
First off, thanks for the reply. I appreciate it greatly!
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> * Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
>> I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
>
> Ye
Hi.
It works, I'm in! Authentication mechanism set to External and five
colons after {PLAIN} the command "a AUTHENTICATE EXTERNAL =" worked.
It was brute force that did the trick, after reading as much as I could
find about /etc/passwd file formats I was still none the wiser.
passwd file
> These web servers also use the nullfs mount which is actually a NFS
> mount via the host machine to get the content that it serves to the
> reverse proxy.
But Web servers usually don't delete or rename files, do they?
Hi all
Can i use Managesieve patch for Dovecot v1.2.10
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.2/dovecot-1.2.10-managesieve-0.11.11.diff.gz
on new Dovecot version v1.2.11
http://www.dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.11.tar.gz ?
Is Dovecot gonna work correctly after compiled with SIEVE support and
There was an other problem. I forgot to remove the .INBOX
subdirectories. They were a rudiment of earlier tests. Well, I've
removed them, and the original problem is resolved. But now I run into
another trouble. The users cannot subscribe to the inboxes other
users. The inbox paths in the s
Stephan Bosch schrieb:
> Oliver Eales wrote:
>>
>> the mailbox gets created but not subscribed to. (I didn't make any
>> difference if i use the :create sieve command or leave or it out)
>>
>> Am i doing something wrong ?
>>
> Not that I can see. I've tested the behavior at my end and all works
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I haven't tried to really understand what your plugin does, but looks
> like it does most of its work in mail_alloc(). deliver does the mail
> delivery via:
>
> typedef int deliver_mail_func_t(struct mail_namespace *namespaces,
>
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> auth: Fatal: Master passdb can't have pass=yes if there are no passdbs
>> master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed, throttling
>>
>
> I fixed that a few days ago in hg.
>
The original error is gone but it is still not working for me. Now i get
in the debu
What, exactly, is the problem? How do you want Dovecot and XMail to work
together?
I am setting up Dovecot to read from standard Maildirs in user home
directories, because I am using a separate delivery agent (TMDA but would work
for maildrop, Dovecot's deliver program and others) to deliver m
> I was part of the discussion group for NFSv4 spec
> the short comings of v2 and v3 have been fixed
I'm a bit surprised by this. Which "discussion group"?
> NFSD (v2/v3) is stateless other than the information provided by
> mountd (mount requests) and lockd (file locking).
NFS is stateless save t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Frank Cusack wrote:
[...]
> And when you don't want to block on I/O. Threads are almost always
> easier than AIO, and especially easy (ie, no scary complexity issues
> eg deadlock) if you aren't sharing data
31 matches
Mail list logo
