Hello everyone,
I am currently running Dovecot as a high performance solution to a particular
kind of problem. My userbase is small, but it murders email servers. The volume
is moderate, but message retention requirements are stringent, to put it nicely.
Many users receive a high volume of e
Wayne Thursby put forth on 2/15/2010 10:24 AM:
> My Setup:
> Postfix and Dovecot running on the same virtual machine on a Dell 2950
> with 1x Xeon E5440 on ESXi 4. Maildirs served up by 10x146GB SCSI drives
> on RAID-10 via direct attached Dell MD-1000.
Interesting setup Wayne.
The same ESXi/
Helloo,
We are using dovectot lda with qmail-ldap,
dovecot 1.2.10, sieve 0.1.15
lda is executed as
exec /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -s
preline adds Delivered-To: header,
everything works fine except vacation
Feb 9 16:07:16 thebe dovecot: deliver(lazy)
Not sure what to call this - I'm actually working out the details as I
type this.
I want to have a valid username/password for an account for sending
purposes - but when receiving this is an alias that broadcasts to
several users.
Example: accountspaya...@mydomain.com - is an alias for
j..
> Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > plugin {
> > sieve_extensions = +imapflags
> > }
> >
> > in dovecot.conf. I know that imapflags is deprecated, but it is still
> > supposed
> > to be supported. Unfortunately ingo1 doesn't support imap4flags yet
> > (http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8784).
> >
> Thi
Andrew Schulman wrote:
plugin {
sieve_extensions = +imapflags
}
in dovecot.conf. I know that imapflags is deprecated, but it is still supposed
to be supported. Unfortunately ingo1 doesn't support imap4flags yet
(http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8784).
This is a known problem and it has been
Dovecot 1.2.10 in Debian, using Dovecot sieve.
I have a sieve script, generated by Ingo, that's supposed to mark spam messages
as "Seen" and file them into the Junk folder. In part it reads:
require ["regex", "body", "imapflags", "fileinto"];
if exists "X-Spam-Flag" {
addflag "\\Seen";
Quoting Timo Sirainen, who wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:23:09PM +0200 ..
> On 10.2.2010, at 21.36, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Hello Timo,
> > - On my new system I have dovecot v 1.2.8 which refuses to handle these
> > dot-seperated files. I get the somewhat familiar
> > "Mailbox doesn't allow in
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 11:19 AM:
> Well, the issue is, with mbox, you can decide if the name you create:
>
> a) can hold child mailboxes, or messages
>
> or
>
> b) messages, and no mailboxes
>
> it makes more sense when you think about them as directories and files. WIth
> mbox a
Wayne Thursby put forth on 2/15/2010 10:24 AM:
> My Setup:
> Postfix and Dovecot running on the same virtual machine on a Dell 2950
> with 1x Xeon E5440 on ESXi 4. Maildirs served up by 10x146GB SCSI drives
> on RAID-10 via direct attached Dell MD-1000.
Interesting setup Wayne.
> Serving 600+ us
Em 14/02/2010 04:53, to...@tuxteam.de escreveu:
No, just let Dovecot's algorithm do the generation (and later checking)
of the password? (I might be misunderstanding your problem, though).
unfortunelly i cant do that. I have my own accounts admin system,
written in PHP, which does ma
Well, the issue is, with mbox, you can decide if the name you create:
a) can hold child mailboxes, or messages
or
b) messages, and no mailboxes
it makes more sense when you think about them as directories and files. WIth
mbox a mailbox is a file. So:
~/mailbox/inbox
~/mailbox/foo/
~mailbox/fo
> Luigi Rosa uttered:
> Hi,
> has anyone implemented a mail server with maildir, Postfix and Dovecot
> using
> Active Directory ad userbase and password authentication?
>
> Do I need Samba to authenticate users?
>
> Can I use credential caching just like mysql?
>
>
> Ciao,
> luigi
>
> --
> /
> +--
Well, I had the same problem and a colleague pointed me to this cockeyed
black-is-white TB config setting:
Under Account Settings, Server Settings, Server Settings, Advanced,
*UN*click "Server supports folders that contain sub-folders and
messages". Then you can create sub-folders. Doesn't mak
On 15.2.2010, at 17.52, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Speaking of which, I've tried creating empty imap folders and then creating
> subfolders in them. TB won't allow me to do this with Dovecot mbox accounts.
> Shouldn't I be able to do this? I've tried it with and without
> tb-extra-mailbox-sep enable
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 9:26 AM:
> On 15.2.2010, at 17.23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and
>>> maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it speci
Frank Bonnet put forth on 2/15/2010 4:30 AM:
>> mail_privileged_group=mail
>> in dovecot.conf and I think you''ll be good to go.
> it's already set ...
Hmm
> BTW what kind of locking are you using ?
> I do not use NFS and all files are located on "local" disks
I use pretty much the doveco
On 15.2.2010, at 17.23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and
>> maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it specific to
>> mbox?
Oh, and: In general, IMAP clients a
On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and
> maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it specific to
> mbox?
I looked at the patch, and it looked like the code that handled condstore was
simply ju
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 8:58 AM:
> On 15.2.2010, at 16.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about this
>>> here. Basically the fix is to disable CONDSTORE support in Thunderbird
>>> until 3.0.2 is released.
>>
>> I guess I shou
On 15.2.2010, at 16.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about this
>> here. Basically the fix is to disable CONDSTORE support in Thunderbird until
>> 3.0.2 is released.
>
> I guess I should have paid closer attention to that thread. Since I
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 8:18 AM:
> On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
>>
>> Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
>> were marked as unread.
>
> This is a Thun
Stan,
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade
directions, I
stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in
/home/%user/mail/.imap. Performed upg
Em 15/02/2010 12:14, Stan Hoeppner escreveu:
WTF is going on? Why won't they stay marked as read? I've got over 25,000
emails in these folders and I get a few hundred list mails a day. I really need
to get this read/unread business straightened out.
What the heck am I missing? Is this a bug
On 15.02.2010 17:14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I
stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in
/home/%user/mail/.imap. Perfor
On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
>
> Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
> were marked as unread.
This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about thi
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I
stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in
/home/%user/mail/.imap. Performed upgrade to 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Modified n
On 10.2.2010, at 21.36, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> - On my new system I have dovecot v 1.2.8 which refuses to handle these
> dot-seperated files. I get the somewhat familiar
> "Mailbox doesn't allow inferior mailboxes".
mbox hierarchy separator is typically '/'. The above error message sounds like
Quoting Wilko Bulte, who wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:36:33PM +0100 ..
> hi
>
> Today I have been in a puzzling fight with 2 dovecot versions that I would
> like to ask some comments on.
>
> The situation is this:
>
> - I have a considerable mail archive in mbox format (yes, I know, but that
I use Dovecot for SASL authentication from Postfix. In Postfix main.cf I
have:
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
It works good, but now I need to allow users to connect by IMAP only from
given IP adresses. I've added extra field allow_nets to passdb in Dovecot,
and IMAP authentication works fine. But now
On 02/15/10 10:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Frank Bonnet put forth on 2/15/2010 3:21 AM:
Well I've looked forward into the wiki and did not found
my server have only system users ( no virtual domain )
and the wiki says :
System users
If you wish you use deliver for all system users on a single dom
Frank Bonnet put forth on 2/15/2010 3:21 AM:
> Well I've looked forward into the wiki and did not found
> my server have only system users ( no virtual domain )
> and the wiki says :
>
> System users
>
> If you wish you use deliver for all system users on a single domain mail
> host you can do it
Hi Timo
Looks like COMPRESS=DEFLATE is valid only after login, which made it
much easier to implement. It's now in v2.0 hg. Tested that it seems to
work with Thunderbird 3.0.1.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/29f5567e0a9a
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = zlib imap_zlib
}
Oh!! Dur
Well I've looked forward into the wiki and did not found
my server have only system users ( no virtual domain )
and the wiki says :
System users
If you wish you use deliver for all system users on a single domain mail
host you can do it by editing mailbox_command parameter in
/etc/postfix/mai
Hi,
I have installed dovecot(1.2.10) with --libexecdir=/usr/lib .
Dovecot sieve(0.1.15) is compiled with --with-dovecot
but still uses /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver instead of
/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver.
How should be dovecot sieve configured to use /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
thanks in advance
On 15.2.2010, at 8.13, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/14/2010 1:31 PM:
>> On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 01:16 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> If you use maildir format mailboxen, you physically can't run into a write
>>> lock
>>> contention between the MTA and the imap process becaus
36 matches
Mail list logo
