Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
How scalable is dovecot.
Very, but also it will vary by how you implement it (mbox or maildir,
local or remote disk, etc).
Do you think a machine with a dual core 2.8Ghz processor and 2GB of
RAM would do a business with 600 users?
Yes, unless something else is
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 01:19 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > - create yet another proxy to login processes. Probably some day I
> > > should combine all of them to one that only proxies i/ostreams. Although
> > > implementing SSL i/ostreams could be a bit difficult.
Looks like COMPRESS=DEFLATE i
Em 12/02/2010 23:43, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
Oh, this one. It's a libc bug.. I reported it to Ubuntu people already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/380487
Wouldn't hurt to report it elsewhere too :)
Anyway, it crashes only if the problematic setting is first in the
config
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 23:28 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x4c1be763 in unsetenv () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt full
> #0 0x4c1be763 in unsetenv () from /lib/libc.so.6
> No symbol table info available.
> #1 0x0805cc44 in main (argc=9, a
Em 12/02/2010 22:57, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
Can you cause it to crash by running deliver directly from command line?
If so, gdb backtrace would be nice:
gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
run
bt full
yes i can make it crash from command line. Hope the informations help
you
i'm run
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:35 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> Feb 12 21:27:54 correio postfix/pipe[12484]: 930F9F6105:
> to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.21,
> delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.18, dsn=4.3.0, status=SOFTBOUNCE (Command died with
> signal 11: "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver")
Can you cause it to c
Em 12/02/2010 22:35, Leonardo Rodrigues escreveu:
Feb 12 21:28:41 correio postfix/pipe[12748]: 1A969F6105:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.28,
delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.24, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot
service)
disabling mail_debug makes the segfault happens again and
ree
i'm facing a pretty hard to debug problem when trying to use
dovecot LDA (deliver) from postfix. After having all configured, mail
deliver fails. This is from my maillog:
Feb 12 21:27:54 correio postfix/pipe[12484]: 930F9F6105:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.21,
delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.18, ds
On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
How scalable is dovecot. Do you think a machine with a dual core
2.8Ghz processor and 2GB of RAM would do a business with 600 users?
This server will have a 100Mbps link to the net, however it will be
access by the business using a couple
Hi Folks,
How scalable is dovecot. Do you think a machine with a dual core 2.8Ghz
processor and 2GB of RAM would do a business with 600 users? This server
will have a 100Mbps link to the net, however it will be access by the
business using a couple of ADSL lines (Roughly 7Mbps each).
This ma
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:40 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> > Yeah, not for next half a year at least. Anyway, it would basically need
> > istream and ostream implementations for zlib. istream implementation
> > kind of already exists in zlib plugin, except it's using gz*() functions
> > instead of doing ever
Ignoring my previous message just for a second, I realized that my
config wasn't correct. First the layout:
~mail/
~mail/Drafts
~mail/Ashley-Feb09
~mail/Others-Feb09
~mail-Archives/
~mail-Archives/2009/
~mail-Archives/2009/Ashley/
i use drbd to keep the mailstore redundant and rsnapshot for backup.
I think mail is the wrong application for nfs, because nfs is slow for
metadata operations.
Would rather use it for vm hosting than mail.
We used to have a small clustered netapp with 10k hdds and three
frontend servers with postfix and courier imap/pop3.
the setup was stable however the performan
Hello all ( Postfix and Dovecot )
Trying to use deliver as mailbox_command with Postfix I get this
error each time an email is arriving
deliver(): Error: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/)
failed: Permission denied (euid=3003() egid=3010(smig) missing
+w perm: /var/mail) (
hi..
i can resolve them setting de following parameters:
in dovecot.conf:
- coment mail_uid and mail_gid parameters:
#mail_uid= 72940
#mail_gid= 72941
in dovecot-ldap.conf:
- add the foollowing parameters in "user_attrs":
user_attrs= .,=uid=72940,gid=72
hi...
i upgrading dovecot from v1.0.7 to v1.2.10, so i perform some modifications
(http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.1 and
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2), but i have the following problem
when i want to test installation:
in dovecot.conf, i set the user mail:
mail_uid= 72940
ma
Is any posibility to pass parameters/environment variables to deliver
with sieve plugin?
I have some procmail rules to decide where mail should go, which
can't be migrated to sieve (uses external programs). So far I write it
to maildirs, but I wonder to migrate to mdbox, and procmail can't
handle
Does that really work?
http://old.nabble.com/Virtual-POP3-Inbox-question-td27488956.html
POP3 uses only the INBOX - by default. But you could add some 'magic'
with the virtual plugin: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual
Regards,
Pascal
Following from Steffen Kaiser's response, RFC5230 explains the
conditions necessary for the Sieve Vacation extension to trigger a
response.
This says:
"Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or
"Rese
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 20:47 +0100, Rampage wrote:
as you can see the shared folder is listed but something seems to be
wrong in the path.
I don't see anything wrong.
mhhh maybe it's an issue in thunderbird 2 that can't manage this?
couse act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
BAD 4. send message from anotheru...@anotherdomain.tld to
u...@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered
to ?
See: http://tools.ietf.or
Hello,
scenario:
OK 1. created vacation script (see below)
OK 2. send message from u...@anotherdomain.tld to u...@domain.tld =>
got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13)
OK 3. send message from u...@anotherdomain.tld to u...@domain.tld =>
no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (201
23 matches
Mail list logo
