Răzvan Sandu put forth on 2/4/2010 5:39 AM:
> I need a way of automatically performing the DELE command at server
> level, just after a POP3 user *succesfully* downloaded his messages via
> POP3...
And this is going to really upset customers who access a single POP account from
a work PC, a home
On 5.2.2010, at 0.06, Jean-Francois wrote:
> dovecot does just write no
> information but the process will not be created, no error message.
You're probably just looking into wrong log file.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Logging
Le jeudi 04 février 2010 21:32:05, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Jean,
>
> You must have missed something in the conf file (dovecot.conf)
> It has happened to me too and it was typos or things that don't
> match on the "dovecot.conf" file.
>
> Have a quick check.
>
> HTH,
>
> .s
>
> --- On Thu, 4/2/1
On 2010-02-03 9:13 PM, Frank Cusack
wrote:
> On February 3, 2010 4:49:50 PM -0500 Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>> I have a question regarding how dovecot might behave if a mail client
>> (like, for example, Thunderbird) decided to store some of its config
>> files on the IMAP server itself.
>>
>> Woul
I need mailutil in order to use the mbox to maildir translation routines
that are posted in the Dovecot wiki, but there is no mailutil with the
AIX image...
mailutil is apparently built as part of Pine, and indeed I can see it in
the build tree from my V4.6.1 Pine build, which I still haveOT
Hi Jean,
You must have missed something in the conf file (dovecot.conf)
It has happened to me too and it was typos or things that don't
match on the "dovecot.conf" file.
Have a quick check.
HTH,
.s
--- On Thu, 4/2/10, Jean-Francois wrote:
> From: Jean-Francois
> Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot
Hi All,
Actually, I installed Dovecot on an OpenBSD server, however, after properly
setting (assumed) the confs, Dovecot does'nt start. I don't know the reason
but don't know how to debug. Where is the log about reason for not starting ?
Thank you for helping.
Regards
On February 4, 2010 4:40:37 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote:
If it acts just like a local filesystem, then it doesn't have any
problems with Dovecot. But that guarantee usually makes the performance
worse, so I would have thought it had less strong guarantees. Anyway, I
don't know almost anything a
its posible upgrade from dovecot 1.0.x to 1.2.x?
i only see upgrades over micro versions..
thanks!
--
Salu2 ;)
Hi,
> - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to
> the same server behind the loadbalancer (because dovecot-deliver is
> used which updates indexes?)
like mentioned on the website, but "would it be possible without nasty
errors" ?
> - If we think of a "active/passive" se
Am Montag 01 Februar 2010 19:01:02 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> It's beginning to sound like I should add "lmtp_headers" setting where
> you could do all kinds of "interesting" things like:
That'd be great!
+1
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Dominik
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:56:14 -0200, Marcio Merlone
wrote:
> Em 1/2/2010 14:15, Charles Marcus escreveu:
>> On 2010-02-01 9:22 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappear
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Well, I know that the client knows it has *successfully* downloaded
messages, but how does the server know? Just to sent down some
packets through the wire does not mean success.
Thanks,
I see... so the server knows nothing about the success or insuccess of
retrieving m
Hi!
I downgraded again and found the same result. Seems that this problem
occurs after
version change after first access the problem seems to be gone.
But there is still the disconnecting problem with mutt.
Greetings
Thorsten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
Thanks a lot, but the problem here are not the IMAP users accessing the
server via squirrelmail. Few people use this.
Er, it doesn't matter if just few users use IMAP, but that the solution
has to cope with
Hmmm... I just had another thought...
Would it be possible for a standalone IMAP client like TB to somehow
download dovecot's indexes and make use of them locally?
So, for example, instead of downloading the headers for 1
messages in a folder, it could simply download and utilize dovecots
ind
> On 2010-02-03 5:14 PM, John Chapman
> wrote:
Sorry about that... the 'Change Quote and Reply Format' extension
for TB has a bug in it when you use 'Reply-To-List', where it uses
the wrong 'Author' - above it should have said Timo instead of 'John
Chapman'.
Sorry Timo...
--
Best regards,
Ch
On 2010-02-03 5:14 PM, John Chapman
wrote:
> On 4.2.2010, at 0.14, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> This would be so it could auto-disable GLODA - its new 'Global Search
>> and Indexing' scheme - for that account - assuming they accept (and
>> implement) my bug request to be able to do that:
>>
>> http
Am 04.02.2010 12:56, schrieb Marcio Merlone:
> Em 1/2/2010 14:15, Charles Marcus escreveu:
>> On 2010-02-01 9:22 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopeni
Am 04.02.2010 12:39, schrieb Răzvan Sandu:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks a lot, but the problem here are not the IMAP users accessing the
> server via squirrelmail. Few people use this.
>
> What I mainly want to avoid are *POP3* users checking the „Leave a copy
> on the server” checkmark.
>
> I need a way
Hi Timo
Tks, very much for the help... finally i finish my plugin and Its Work now.
Now i will start the second phase about this modifications.
I Need 3 more modifications one is encrypt my splited body (the header
will still open)... but i have some doubt.
The body email is splited in
Em 1/2/2010 14:15, Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 2010-02-01 9:22 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopening the folder
again.
I did upgrade too, _lots_ of mess
@Pascal Volk
Thanks for the algorithm you've provided !
Unfortuantely, I'm not a programmer myself and I don't feel confident to
code such an utility (even if I perfectly understand your pseudocode). ;-)
What I'm looking for is not even a hand-made script, but a production
solution included
Hello,
Thanks a lot, but the problem here are not the IMAP users accessing the
server via squirrelmail. Few people use this.
What I mainly want to avoid are *POP3* users checking the „Leave a copy
on the server” checkmark.
I need a way of automatically performing the DELE command at server
Hi!
Something new about that?
We also checked the Loadbalancer config depending on the connection losts
using mutt, they are exactly the same as the one which works with 1.1.6
fine.
So I strongly believe it is a dovecot 1.2.10 problem.
Greetings
Thorsten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
I have a question regarding how dovecot might behave if a mail client
(like, for example, Thunderbird) decided to store some of its config
files on the IMAP server itself.
Alpine/pine does so.
The kolab su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
- IMAP is allowed only locally, in order to be used together via stock
squirrelmail Web interface (for emergencies only)
However, there are users that check the infamous „Leave a copy on the server”
checkbox
27 matches
Mail list logo
