At Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:17:37 -0500,
David Abrahams wrote:
>
> But, whatever is wrong with command c, it does seem to be working!
Spoke too soon, perhaps.
If I delete the last message in a thread from my regular INBOX, the
conversation view still shows the thread.
By the way, is there any way to
At Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:51:04 +0200,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:50 -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
> > At Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:17:40 +0200,
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4.1.2010, at 20.47, David Abrahams wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1. I had to manually create the virtual fol
I haven't reported this to the fetchmail developers, but I will now
that I've confirmed it's their bug.
For those interested, I've raised this on the fetchmail list here:
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/fetchmail-users/2010-January/002183.html
With the help of Timo and the fetchm
On 22.1.2010, at 0.51, Federico Tomasczik wrote:
> 1) A group of users can use IMAP or POP3.
>
> 2) The others, only can use POP3. But, this users can use IMAP only
> with a webmail (the webmail is in the same server that Dovecot)
>
> It is possible? How?
If you're using SQL, you can do somethi
It's always worth searching the mailing list to see if the question's
already been asked
You don't say how you run your authentication backend. I'll hazard a
guess that you're using MySQL, in which case you should see
http://old.nabble.com/Allow-POP3-per-Domain-td27143238.html
for reference.
In y
Hello!
First, sorry for my English...
I'm a newbie with Dovecot and I have some questions,
I'm testing Dovecot 1.1.11 in a virtual machine. I wish in the future,
migrate this to a real server.
Ok, but i need this:
1) A group of users can use IMAP or POP3.
2) The others, only can use POP3. But
Hi!
I'm pretty unsure this is only a TB3 problem. Saw the same result with
TB 2.0, but I'm unsure if this was after changing something on the
server. After 2 days of mailproblems we downgraded back to Dovecot 1.1
yesterday and no one reported this bug since this downgrade.
Greetings,
Thorste
Ok, I didn't understand it wasn't gone. I only read the doc today
:)
* Timo Sirainen [2010-01-21 22:58]:
On 21.1.2010, at 22.38, Kirill Miazine wrote:
Could we have nologin back please?
Where do you see nologin ever mentioned in authentication
protocol? I
don't see it in v1.0's auth-pr
On 21.1.2010, at 22.38, Kirill Miazine wrote:
>>> Could we have nologin back please?
>>
>> Where do you see nologin ever mentioned in authentication protocol? I
>> don't see it in v1.0's auth-protocol.txt. It's still working, it's just
>> not really part of the protocol itself.
>
> Quoting yours
* Timo Sirainen [2010-01-21 22:17]:
> On 21.1.2010, at 22.09, Kirill Miazine wrote:
>
> > I notice that the nologin parameter for the AUTH command is gone in
> > version 1.1 of Dovecot Authentication Protocol.
> >
> > nologin was added in 1.1, so that authentication client could indicate
> > that
On 21.1.2010, at 22.09, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> I notice that the nologin parameter for the AUTH command is gone in
> version 1.1 of Dovecot Authentication Protocol.
>
> nologin was added in 1.1, so that authentication client could indicate
> that there will be no subsequent master requests to re
* Kirill Miazine [2010-01-21 21:09]:
> I notice that the nologin parameter for the AUTH command is gone in
> version 1.1 of Dovecot Authentication Protocol.
>
> nologin was added in 1.1, so that authentication client could indicate
I meant 1.0, of course.
> that there will be no subsequent maste
I notice that the nologin parameter for the AUTH command is gone in
version 1.1 of Dovecot Authentication Protocol.
nologin was added in 1.1, so that authentication client could indicate
that there will be no subsequent master requests to retrieve user info.
Could we have nologin back please?
Ki
Am 21.01.2010 18:14, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
>>
>>> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
>>> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail
>>>
On 01/21/2010 12:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail acces
Hi folks,
Today I setup Cacti for my environment and I was wondering if there are
some templates/scripts for Cacti or SNMP I could use to gather some
statistics from Dovecot.
Thanks in advance.
BR
Chris
On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
>
>> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
>> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail accessing
>> the same servers. The problem is all my us
On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail accessing
> the same servers. The problem is all my users are convinced it's my mail
> servers. ;) However
On 01/21/2010 12:00 PM, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Hello, same problem here. I use Thunderbird 3.0.1. The strange thing
is that with the same version of TB on my PC at home I don't have this
issue. The same TB on my work PC has this issue and only on one
account (that has Dovecot as imap
On 21/01/2010 17:53, David Halik wrote:
Good news and bad news.
The good news is that I've been core dump free for about 24 hours. The
duplicate message issue is still there, so if you wanted that fix then
I guess the patch is not complete yet, otherwise it looks good.
The bad news is that
Good news and bad news.
The good news is that I've been core dump free for about 24 hours. The
duplicate message issue is still there, so if you wanted that fix then I
guess the patch is not complete yet, otherwise it looks good.
The bad news is that I'm now convinced that another problem I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
My silly and honest answer is: the fact, that I found maildrop first some weeks
ago and it seemed very flexible (a feeling of security in a sense, that I won't
have "any" impossible thing), but then I came
On Qua, 20 Jan 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
Does Dovecot really need a separate MTA for inbound mail? Or can it receive
SMTP directly if there is no forwarding to do? What about spam/virus
filtering in that case?
Dovecot does not receive mails. It only serves them to users via IMAP or POP3.
So,
* Timo Sirainen :
> If you set shutdown_clients=yes. Although even with =no it should stop
> listening.
shutdown_clients=yes is the default? I think it is :)
> I guess there can be bugs.. But in general the processes should notice
> immediately that master died, and immediately close their l
On 21.1.2010, at 16.35, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Which part of the process structure can be killed and takes all it's
> children with it?
>
> ├─runsvdir─┬─runsv───ntpd
> │ ├─runsv─┬─dovecot─┬─2*[dovecot-auth]
> │ │ │ ├─1203*[imap]
> │ │
I'm running dovecot under runit:
#!/bin/sh
echo '/var/core/%p' > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
ulimit -n 8096
ulimit -c unlimited
exec /usr/local/sbin/dovecot -F
(that way, together with incron, I can automatically generate the
coredumps I'm posting all the time)
If I apply a patch and recompile
* Timo Sirainen :
> > This should fix it (and hopefully doesn't expose another bug):
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/a1177c6cf8c7
>
> I think that fixes all of the "duplicate entry in uidlist" errors that have
> been reported recently. So please test soon and report how it goes over a
Does Dovecot really need a separate MTA for inbound mail? Or can it receive
SMTP directly if there is no forwarding to do? What about spam/virus
filtering in that case?
--
Phil Howard KA9WGN - ka9...@gmail.com
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 10:25 +0100, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
> When a user in thunderbird toggles some flags like junk, spam or
> something similar dovecot appends these flags form a-z to the end of
> the file in maildir.
>
> I have another application that also access the maildirs which gets
> re
ok.. sry for spam..
figured it out..
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,uid=mail=maildir:/mail/%$
2010/1/21 :
> hi again..
>
> user_filter =
> (&(objectClass=gosaMailAccount)(|(mail=%u)(gosaMailAlternateAddress=%u)))
>
> this works to check if the account is valid but i cant figure out how
> to s
On 2010-01-21 12:06:33 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> My silly and honest answer is: the fact, that I found maildrop first some
> weeks
> ago and it seemed very flexible (a feeling of security in a sense, that I
> won't
> have "any" impossible thing), but then I came across the mentioned proble
hi again..
user_filter =
(&(objectClass=gosaMailAccount)(|(mail=%u)(gosaMailAlternateAddress=%u)))
this works to check if the account is valid but i cant figure out how
to set the maillocation
i think this is done in user_attrs
but no idea how to use the uid. i tryed "user_attrs =
home=maildir:/
hi..
im running dovecot 1.2.9 and checking against an openldap.
i defined in dovecot.conf mail_location = maildir:/mail/%u
and now all mails are stored under /mail/my.e...@mydomain.com
how can i store them in /mail/ldapuid ?
these userdb and passdb settings drive me crazy..
looks like ldap is a
On Thursday 21 January 2010 11:13:22 Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2010-01-20 21:11:59 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > I found a post in this list [0], which says sieve scripts can be used to
> > deliver mail as read. However, can it be done somehow conditionally, I
> > mean, with a direct or indire
On 2010-01-20 21:11:59 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> I found a post in this list [0], which says sieve scripts can be used to
> deliver mail as read. However, can it be done somehow conditionally, I mean,
> with a direct or indirect switch for deliver?
> For a nonexistent example, it would be si
When a user in thunderbird toggles some flags like junk, spam or
something similar dovecot appends these flags form a-z to the end of
the file in maildir.
I have another application that also access the maildirs which gets
really upset with these flags and ignore those emails.
Are there any
36 matches
Mail list logo
