> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:08 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> > Dec 14 12:46:04 server01 postfix/pipe[1870]: 57489E913:
>> > to=, orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
>> > delay=1703, delays=1369/328/0/5.9, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced
>> (permission
>> > denied. Command output: Not enough disk space )
>>
>> Can y
Papp Tamás wrote, On 2009. 12. 22. 0:32:
hi All,
I have a problem, which makes me headache. I can't find out, what is
the problem.
I have a mail szerver, which works just fine as expected, TB move
messages to trash folder after I delete it, and they are moved.
I have an other server. If I
hi All,
I have a problem, which makes me headache. I can't find out, what is the
problem.
I have a mail szerver, which works just fine as expected, TB move
messages to trash folder after I delete it, and they are moved.
I have an other server. If I delete a message, it doesn't move to the
In Windows Live Mail I have this setting enabled: "Remove From Server
When Deleted From Deleted Items". It does not seem to remove them
even when the trash is emptied though. Am using POP3 access. Anyone
else see this?
Matt
On 20.12.2009, at 1.01, Pascal Volk wrote:
> Does this mean, all the mentions of v1.x could be removed when a page is
> updated?
> Some v1.x specific pages (e.g. /LDA/Sieve/CMU) can be deleted?
Yes.
Just wanted to update you that I just upgraded all of our servers to
1.2.9 and I'm still seeing the array_delete panic:
Dec 21 12:10:16 gehenna11.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user1): Panic: file
maildir-uidlist.c: line 403 (maildir_uidlist_records_array_delete):
assertion failed: (pos != NULL)
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:44:42 +0100
Joan wrote:
> >
> > You need to check user's quota on routing stage, not transport.
> >
> It'd be much better, because I would allow me to mix overquota and
> no-overquota recipients.
> But the problem in my case is that I am using some hashing to
> distribute t
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Is there any plan to add quota enforcement to managesieve?
Yes, it's on the TODO list.
Yes, it's been on the TODO for a long time, but how much of a priority
is it?
As a matter of fact, it no longer has a priority, simply becau
Hi,
I am trying to deploy large e-mail system but I will use qmail-ldap on Linux
and maildir will be mounted by all backends from Netapp via NFS.
In LDAP, there will be only one mailhost entry. All qmail-ldap backends will
have same name and will run dovecot instance. So, all users can access to
Heya,
We are in the process of migrating from qpopper to dovecot as POP3 server (and
IMAP as well) and we hit the UIDL issue with dovecot. Qpopper uses its own
algorithm to create UIDL values and if you set it up to write them down in the
mbox file as X-UIDL, then dovecot can use them (pop_uidl
10 matches
Mail list logo
