On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote:
>
>> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth
>> -I../../src/lib-mail -I../../src/lib-imap -I../../src/lib-index
>> -I../../src/lib-storage/index/maildir -I../../src/
Hi All,
Our webmail having an issue with the harddrive so I build new webmail on other
machine (using Squirrelmail+dovecot+postfix). After copy all data/home folder
from the backup, when this user want to access his Sent item, nothing's in it.
I've checked the log and found the message as belo
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:43 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> From RFC 5530[3]:
>
> NONEXISTENT
>
> The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist.
>
> NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE)
> commands.
Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt
I'm going to take exception to the way dovecot (1.2.8) is returning
the NONEXISTENT response code in certain cases. For example, these
transactions:
c: 1 EXAMINE "foo"
S: 1 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: foo
C: 2 STATUS "foo" (MESSAGES)
S: 2 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist:
Hello,
which solution will be working or will be working better
(performance). Using dovecot 1.2.6 (plugin section contains quota_rule
= *:storage=500M:messages=1 and i need override this default quota
for some users)
A) passdb sql(SELECT userid AS user, pw AS password, quota AS
userdb_quota
On 11/20/09 , Nov 20, 11:13 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP
described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3
bugging the hell out of me about the "all o
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote:
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth
> -I../../src/lib-mail -I../../src/lib-imap -I../../src/lib-index
> -I../../src/lib-storage/index/maildir -I../../src/auth
> -DPKG_RUNDIR=\""/usr/local/var/run/dovecot"\" -I/us
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:38:43 -0500
Jonathan Jonathan replied:
[snip]
> I'm giving Claws Mail, a fork of Sylpheed apparently, a try. Haven't
> found a way to change key bindings yet and SHIFT-! is really awkward
> for marking a message unread.
Place cursor over 'Mark as Read"
Press the key
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Tony Rutherford wrote:
> We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right
> now). Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that
> a plugin developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line?
There are some
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote:
I've got an issue using Sun's compilers on Solaris 10 - it appears
that dovecot is trying to use the getopt function, that's part of
GNU's glibc, and, therefore, not present when using Sun's compilers.
Any ideas on how to resolve?
cc -DHAVE_CO
I've got an issue using Sun's compilers on Solaris 10 - it appears that dovecot
is trying to use the getopt function, that's part of GNU's glibc, and,
therefore, not present when using Sun's compilers.
Any ideas on how to resolve?
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-
We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right now).
Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that a plugin
developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line?Thanks,Tony
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to whom
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> We're talking about a mailbox with two or more users always in it and
> around 40K messages across a few hundred folders. The scale of it
> all seems to be part of the issue I think.
Ok, last question then I'll shut up... ;)
Have you tri
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP
described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3
bugging the hell out of me about the "all of a sudden a b
On 11/20/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
> What IMAP server?
heh... dumb question, huh...
dovecot -n output?
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP
> described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3
> bugging the hell out of me about the "all of a sudden a bunch of
> messages are marked new" issue.
On 11/20/2009, Thomas Berezansky (tsb...@mvlc.org) wrote:
> and Outlook 2007 at home (largely due to getting freaky attachments I
> need to open on a regular basis that only Microsoft mail clients seem
> to be able to open properly).
If you're talking about winmail.dat files, I found a very simple
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, John Gateley wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or
cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings...
Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread
on this list recently about it. It has a l
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:23 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Nov 20 10:16:00 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file
> mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 31 (log_append_buffer): assertion failed:
> ((type & MAIL_TRANSACTION_)
Oh, missed that one: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/fa8a438c64ce
Personally, I am using Horde (http://www.horde.org/) at work (this
address) and Outlook 2007 at home (largely due to getting freaky
attachments I need to open on a regular basis that only Microsoft mail
clients seem to be able to open properly).
Horde is a webmail client, and works well in
On 11/20/2009 12:59 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> I'm getting tired of Thunderbird telling me I have unread messages in
> folders that haven't gotten new messages for months so I'm looking for a
> new mail client. I know the problem lies with Thunderbird because
> everything is fine via RoundCube and if i
On 11/20/2009 1:27 PM, John Gateley wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows
or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings...
Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread
on this list recently about it. It has a l
Jonathan writes:
Hi Jonathan!
> So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days?
I use Gnus [1], the version that is included in Emacs 23.
> Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key
> bindings because (probably like many of you) I get 100s of emails a
> day via lis
Jonathan wrote:
So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or
cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings...
Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread
on this list recently about it. It has a lot of IMAP improvements.
Sylpheed has a ne
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jonathan wrote:
> So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross
> platform and it needs to have decent key bindings because (probably like many
> of you) I get 100s of emails a day via lists and anything that speeds my way
> through them is good
screen+mutt
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
I'm getting tired of Thunderbird telling me I have unread messages in
folders that haven't gotten new messages for months so I'm looking for a
new mail client. I know the problem lies with Thunderbird because
everything is fine via RoundCube and if it tell Thunderbird to rebuild
it's index it
> But "faster" is not always the way to measure things.
>
> In this topic, I think that raw disk access speed is not a critical
> value; I've tested our setup with maildir on NFS and performance is
> close enough to local disks. Given this, I prefer the extra features
> our NAS/SAN setup gives us,
On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On November 19, 2009 7:45:05 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig
>>
>> This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which co
The default dovecot.conf says
# Dictionary can be used by some plugins to store key=value lists.
# Currently this is only used by dict quota backend.
Looks like expire uses dict as well.
The managesieve comments are stale as well, with a reference to
sieve_storage still in there. Or do they
On November 19, 2009 7:45:05 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig
This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be
considered a security hole, exploitable by local users.
Joseba Torre wrote:
El Viernes 20 Noviembre 2009 a las 13:05, alex handle escribió:
to put it simply: local storage
We use Dell R710 in pair, each with 6 15K SAS Disks and RAID 10 -
iSCSI or NFS can hardly be faster
But "faster" is not always the way to measure things.
In this topic,
El Viernes 20 Noviembre 2009 a las 13:05, alex handle escribió:
> to put it simply: local storage
>
> We use Dell R710 in pair, each with 6 15K SAS Disks and RAID 10 -
> iSCSI or NFS can hardly be faster
>
But "faster" is not always the way to measure things.
In this topic, I think that raw disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, JC wrote:
I have debian lenny configured with postfix 2.5.5 and dovecot 1.0.15 with mysql,
every user has a different quota. The problem is that the quota is not ignoring
trash folder, how can I solve this problem? And another q
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI
wrote:
> Robert Schetterer writes:
>
>> sorry for the stupid question what is "DAS"
>> do you have a link etc for it, to get more info
>
> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-attached_storage
>
to put it simply: local storage
We use Dell R7
Robert Schetterer writes:
> sorry for the stupid question what is "DAS"
> do you have a link etc for it, to get more info
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-attached_storage
--
Nicolas
alex handle schrieb:
>> Extra question, what is the better : iSCSI SATA backend or NFS share ?
>> NFS share is more convenient to have a failover server.
>
> Everyone wants to use nfs for mailstorage, because it is convenient,
> but nfs is the wrong storage model for mail.
> NFS shines on big file
>
> Extra question, what is the better : iSCSI SATA backend or NFS share ?
> NFS share is more convenient to have a failover server.
Everyone wants to use nfs for mailstorage, because it is convenient,
but nfs is the wrong storage model for mail.
NFS shines on big files but metadata performance is
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:53:19 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:31 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:10 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning: header rewrite:
> > > size=32824
> > > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...
39 matches
Mail list logo
