At 12:18 PM 10/14/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
Not that you need any help, but I would suggest to just focus on making
the conversion tools (mbox/maildir > (m)dbox, old config > new config,
etc) rock solid, and document any incompatibilities really well.
It'd be nice to think you were kidding, b
Hi All
I have not been able to get per user quotas going. A general quota
works fine. My LDAP server is windows 2000.
Here is my config
mail# dovecot -n
# 1.1.3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log
protocols: imaps pop3s lda managesieve
listen(default): *
listen(imap): *
li
HI All
I'm having this exact problem but I call deliver this way in Postfix
virtual_transport = dovecot
mailbox_transport = dovecot
Should I remove these and use the mailbox_command directive instead as
you suggested?
or is there a mailbox_transport alternative?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, T
Timo,
> -Original Message-
> -O2 compiling has dropped one stage from the backtrace, but I think
this
> will fix the crash:
>
> I guess it would be time for 1.2.7 somewhat soon..
Thanks! As always, you're one step ahead of us with the bug fixes! I've
got one more for you that just popped
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 09:49 +0900, ogu...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> So it means like this?
> A established connection = A pop3-login process
It should be about that.
> I'm having a strange phenomenon that there are 5000
> established
> connections, but pop3-login processes are more than 5000.
How muc
Hello,
Thank you for the reply.
So it means like this?
A established connection = A pop3-login process
I'm having a strange phenomenon that there are 5000
established
connections, but pop3-login processes are more than 5000.
Regards,
--- Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Hello!
>
> * ogu...@yahoo.c
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:59 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> > I'm planning on keeping both of them. And it's not necessarily only
> > because of NFS users. Multi-dbox was done mainly because filesystems
> > suck (mailbox gets fragmented all around the disk). Maybe if filesystems
> > in future suck less, sin
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 17:14 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> Backtraces and some further information are available here. Cores
> available on request.
> http://uoregon.edu/~brandond/dovecot-1.2.6/bt.txt
-O2 compiling has dropped one stage from the backtrace, but I think this
will fix the crash:
h
We recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.2.4 to 1.2.6 (with the sieve patches
of course). Everything has been running quite well since the upgrade.
The occasional issue with assert-crashing when expunging has gone away.
However, one of our users seems to have triggered a new issue. She's
been the only
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:52 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
But it should be able to heal itself using the backup files in version
2.0, right?
That's the theory anyway. :)
How often are they created anyway?
Whenever dovecot.index file would normally get recreated, the old one is
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:04 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
So basically you prefer mdbox but are maintaining dbox because of its
almost lockless design which is better for NFS users?
Do you consider it to be viable having two different dbox formats or are
you planning to keep only
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:52 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:41 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> And you've actually been looking at Dovecot's error log? Good if it
> >>> doesn't break, most people seem to complain about random errors.
> >
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:41 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
And you've actually been looking at Dovecot's error log? Good if it
doesn't break, most people seem to complain about random errors.
Well, it does complain once in a while but it has never resulted in dat
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:41 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > And you've actually been looking at Dovecot's error log? Good if it
> > doesn't break, most people seem to complain about random errors.
>
> Well, it does complain once in a while but it has never resulted in data
>
Timo Sirainen wrote:
And you've actually been looking at Dovecot's error log? Good if it
doesn't break, most people seem to complain about random errors.
Well, it does complain once in a while but it has never resulted in data
being lost in any way. But I guess your point is that this might h
Thanks Timo.
> From: t...@iki.fi
> To: jolumape...@hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:37:25 -0400
> CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Autocreate plugin for some domains
>
> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:33 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> > working correctly, just wanted to
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:33 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> working correctly, just wanted to ask if I use the variable VPOPUSER not
> bring trouble?
Anything that works is fine.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Timo,
This is the content of /tmp/Environment:
[r...@ml110c ~]# more environment
ANONYMOUS_USERNAME=anonymous
AUTH_1_MASTER=/usr/local/var/run/dovecot/auth-master
AUTH_1_MASTER_GROUP=vchkpw
AUTH_1_MASTER_MODE=600
AUTH_1_MASTER_USER=vpopmail
AUTH_NAME=default
AUTH_WORKER_MAX_COUNT=30
AUTH_WO
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:18 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> >> I don't think I've tried that one. Earlier on I experimented with
> >> fsync_disable=yes (which made a huge difference by the way) but that was
> >> before I started using mail_nfs_storage=yes and mail_nfs_index=yes
> >>
> >> I would like to t
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:14 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
reduce disk i/o, and I'm really inter
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:04 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> So basically you prefer mdbox but are maintaining dbox because of its
> almost lockless design which is better for NFS users?
>
> Do you consider it to be viable having two different dbox formats or are
> you planning to keep only one of them in
Timo Sirainen skrev:
> The main difference is that mdbox needs to lock files when saving
messages. That's not especially nice with NFS. Single-dbox currently
locks index files, but it can be made entirely lockless eventually.
There are also some other differences like:
- in mdbox all messages
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:17 -0400, David Warden wrote:
> To date, the only problem we have experienced is a seemingly random
> but significant slowdown in Squirrelmail's loading of the messages in
> a user's Inbox. Each time, I have been able to fix the problem by
> deleting the user's doveco
Hi All,
I'm running Dovecot 1.1.11 for a site of about 7000 active users with
a Squirrelmail frontend. We migrated from Courier (big shout to
everyone who worked on the wonderful part of the Dovecot wiki that
deals with Courier migration) and I have been extremely happy with the
performan
Good Afternoon,
I have my virtual users stored in an Active Directory database. As far
as mail info goes the 2 important fields are: mail (their primary
email address) and otherMailbox (a multivalue attribute containing
their mail aliases). Right now all email addresses belong in the same
domain a
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:39 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Do you play to support both ways migration tools?
> dbox <-> maildir(s)
convert plugin can already do that. In v2.0 I'm planning on getting rid
of convert plugin and relying on dsync program. It can
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:28 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> From your comments it appears like dbox and mdbox are quite different
> in many ways. Is mdbox going to replace dbox completely or are you
> expecting to keep both formats?
> My point is: what's going to be the difference between dbox and mbox
On Qua, 14 Out 2009, Art Gray - Razorpoint wrote:
Can Dovecot can handle separate authentication for receiving mail
(IMAPS) and sending mail (SMTPS)? In the past, we used Dovecot IMAP
for the receiving part and Cyrus SASL for the sending part. This
allowed us to use two passwords with mail
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:14 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
> >> It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
> >> the number of writes which is really killing us.
> >
> > BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
> > reduce disk i/o, and I'm really inter
Greetings,
Can Dovecot can handle separate authentication for receiving mail
(IMAPS) and sending mail (SMTPS)? In the past, we used Dovecot IMAP
for the receiving part and Cyrus SASL for the sending part. This
allowed us to use two passwords with mail. Cyrus has grown too old
and isn't
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> [...]
Do you play to support both ways migration tools?
dbox <-> maildir(s)
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
"Unlike most net.puritans, however, I feel that what OTHER consenting computers
do in the privacy of their own phone connections is their own b
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
Now the big question is whether multi-dbox and single-dbox are
compatible formats.
Kind of, but not practically.
If a Maildir->dbox migration is made on a system running dovecot v.
1.1, would it then be trivial later changing t
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
reduce disk i/o, and I'm really interest
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:48 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 17:53 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> > What can be done to make maildir_uidlist_refresh_fast_init() choose
> > the fast path more often?
>
> Pretty simple bug. Fixed:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/ebdba086e3b1
Hi Timo,
This is the content of /tmp/Environment:
[r...@ml110c ~]# more environment
ANONYMOUS_USERNAME=anonymous
AUTH_1_MASTER=/usr/local/var/run/dovecot/auth-master
AUTH_1_MASTER_GROUP=vchkpw
AUTH_1_MASTER_MODE=600
AUTH_1_MASTER_USER=vpopmail
AUTH_NAME=default
AUTH_WORKER_MAX_COUNT=30
AUTH_WORK
I'm, as yet, still unable to load any fts plugin ... any advice here? Thx.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:15 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> hi,
>
> @ imap login to 2.0/head,
>
> Oct 12 21:06:53 master: Info: Dovecot v2.0.alpha1 starting up (core
> dumps disabled)
> Oct 12 21:07:16 imap-login: Info: Login:
>
Hi,
I have a configuration with dovecot authenticating to AD.
I would like to authenticate using the user logon name in AD. and mail box
were created according to the field mail in AD
anyone have any idea about this?
my dovecot-ldap:
hosts = xx.xx.xx.xx
base = dc=domain,dc=com
ldap_version = 3
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 17:53 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> What can be done to make maildir_uidlist_refresh_fast_init() choose
> the fast path more often?
Pretty simple bug. Fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/ebdba086e3b1
This makes the performance pretty good when appending to maildirs
Hi,
I have a configuration with dovecot authenticating to AD.
I would like to authenticate using the user logon name in AD. and mail box
were created according to the field mail in AD
anyone have any idea about this?
my dovecot-ldap:
hosts = xx.xx.xx.xx
base = dc=domain,dc=com
ldap_version = 3
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 11:37 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> These are the results:
>
> more /tmp/autocreate
> jmarin
> jmarin
Oh, right, that's because of vchkpw that drops the @domain out of $USER.
What if you simply comment out:
> DOMAIN=`echo $USER|sed s/^.*@//`
Maybe it sets $DOMAIN i
Hi Timo,
These are the results:
more /tmp/autocreate
jmarin
jmarin
I'm using the mail account jma...@operaciones.qnet.com.pe
vchkpw-wrapper.sh
#!/bin/bash
DOMAIN=`echo $USER|sed s/^.*@//`
echo $USER > /tmp/autocreate
echo $DOMAIN >> /tmp/autocreate
if [ "$DOMAIN" = "operaciones.qnet.com.p
On 10/14/2009 12:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
>>> reduce disk i/o, and I'm really interested in hearing how much.
>> What are the downsides? Also, I'm guessing maybe there are certain
>> conditions where you definitely don't
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:18 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> > BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
> > reduce disk i/o, and I'm really interested in hearing how much.
>
> What are the downsides? Also, I'm guessing
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:18 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > The main problem with it is actually how to make it enough backwards
> > compatible that everyone won't start hating me.
>
> I honestly don't see that ever happening Timo - and please, don't go
> down the same road Microsoft did with Win
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 11:43 +, Brightblade wrote:
> Why is dovecot thinking quota is at 99% when du -h show me its value is near
> 70% ? any guess?
Messages copied with hard links. Try "du -l" instead.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 10/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
> reduce disk i/o, and I'm really interested in hearing how much.
What are the downsides? Also, I'm guessing maybe there are certain
conditions where you definitely don't want
On 10/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> I'm trying to get v2.0.0 out pretty quickly though. v2.0.beta1 should
> hopefully be out in less than a month.
Great news on how fast 2.0 is coming along! I finally got the go ahead
to convert my biggest client, but he wants to hold off (politica
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:53 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> I added the line you mentioned
>
> echo "yeah i got here" > /tmp/autocreate
>
> and did not create the file /tmp/autocreate
Then it needs more debugging. Try:
> This is the script with the real domain:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> DO
Dear Timo,
I added the line you mentioned
echo "yeah i got here" > /tmp/autocreate
and did not create the file /tmp/autocreate
This is the script with the real domain:
#!/bin/bash
DOMAIN=`echo $USER|sed s/^.*@//`
if [ "$DOMAIN" = "operaciones.qnet.com.pe" ]; then
export USERDB_AUT
Hello!
* ogu...@yahoo.co.jp [2009-10-14 21:47]:
Hi,
I would like to know if the pop3-login process would be
create
more than one while a user connection is established.
I appologize if I don't understand your question correctly:
There will be login_processes_count login processes listening f
* Darvin Denmian [2009-10-14 12:27]:
Hello,
I need to know : What is the best way to use Postfix (Virtual User on
Mysql) + Dovecot + Maildrop ?
Is there some documentation that you can indicate to me?
Thanks !!
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo
http://wiki.dovecot.org/maildrop
--
-- Kirill
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
reduce disk i/o, and I'm really interested in hearing how mu
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
Now I wonder what may be the best way of doing so. I'm considering
some sort of intermediate migration where the existing Maildir
Hello,
I need to know : What is the best way to use Postfix (Virtual User on
Mysql) + Dovecot + Maildrop ?
Is there some documentation that you can indicate to me?
Thanks !!
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
I found some errors in logs like this:
Oct 14 05:51:47 IMAP(ch...@khb.fxclub.org): Error: stat(/var/spool/
dovecot/domains/khb.fxclub.org/chief/.dovecot.sieve/tmp) failed:
Not a directory
Oct 14 06:17:01 IMA
Hi,
I would like to know if the pop3-login process would be
create
more than one while a user connection is established.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot
imap-login and pop3-login processes handle new IMAP and
POP3 connections until user has logged in.
Brightblade skrev:
Hi all,
I've troubles with dovecot and quota. Sometimes mails to users are bounced because quota
is full. I'm reading quota_rules from LDAP. One "du -h ." from maildir show
user is under quota ( at 70 % more or less), less than 99%, i delete maildirsize and
dovecot recreate
Hi all,
I've troubles with dovecot and quota. Sometimes mails to users are bounced
because quota is full. I'm reading quota_rules from LDAP. One "du -h ." from
maildir show user is under quota ( at 70 % more or less), less than 99%, i
delete maildirsize and dovecot recreate it with ldap-quota v
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce the
number of writes which is really killing us.
Now I wonder what may be the best way of doing so. I'm considering some
sort of intermediate migration where the existing Maildir users are
changed to single-dbox and then late
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 14.10.2009 2:30, Ed W wrote:
Actually, here's the original Nokia paper - just reading it now, seems
quite interesting:
http://research.nokia.com/files/NRCTR2008002.pdf
I wonder whats difference between WM phones which connects to Exchange
servers using same TCP socket
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:15:02PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de schrieb:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:41:40PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
[...]
i ll do backups with rsync on maildirs w
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
I found some errors in logs like this:
Oct 14 05:51:47 IMAP(ch...@khb.fxclub.org): Error:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/domains/khb.fxclub.org/chief/.dovecot.sieve/tmp)
failed: Not a directory
Oct 14 06:17:01 IMAP(m...@fxclub.org): Error:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/
Hello all.
I found some errors in logs like this:
Oct 14 05:51:47 IMAP(ch...@khb.fxclub.org): Error:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/domains/khb.fxclub.org/chief/.dovecot.sieve/tmp)
failed: Not a directory
Oct 14 06:17:01 IMAP(m...@fxclub.org): Error:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/domains/fxclub.org/msa/.d
On 14.10.2009 2:30, Ed W wrote:
Actually, here's the original Nokia paper - just reading it now, seems
quite interesting:
http://research.nokia.com/files/NRCTR2008002.pdf
I wonder whats difference between WM phones which connects to Exchange
servers using same TCP socket via HTTP(S) and push m
64 matches
Mail list logo
