i'm trying to setup autocreate in 2.0.
in mail.conf,
...
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix= ""
inbox = yes
hidden= no
On 10/08/2009 02:49 PM t...@dingsbums.org wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i'm using dovecot deliver (lda) and i want to show quota to the users
> via imap/pop3, but i don't want to enforce it (i.e. don't
> reject/bounce mails when quota is exceeded).
>
> protocol imap {
>mail_plugins = quota imap_qu
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You didn't list "auth", which is also there.
you're correct. so,
auth, auth-source, config, log, anvil
is all the types?
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> gdbhelper is also in PKG_LIBEXECDIR.
ok, so i didn't realize that. my mistake. full paths, then, for
stuff NOT in libexecdir.
thanks.
On Oct 10, 2009, at 4:45 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There are a few internal special-case services and type specifies
what type
it is. So with type=config Dovecot knows that to reload
configuration it
needs to connect to that service.
ok.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The lack of IMAP compliance isn't really as serious as you seem to think.
that may well be the case ... i'm simply presuming, based on oft-made
excuses @ MUA dev that "it's not in the IMAP spec blah blah blah" that
it IS a peblem.
> Almost
On Oct 10, 2009, at 4:51 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
executable is the binary name, relative to PKG_LIBEXECDIR
if relative to PKG_LIBEXECDIR, and $PATH is not used, are the examples
in master.conf, e.g.,
# executable= gdbhel
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> executable is the binary name, relative to PKG_LIBEXECDIR
if relative to PKG_LIBEXECDIR, and $PATH is not used, are the examples
in master.conf, e.g.,
# executable= gdbhelper /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
correct? or shou
On Oct 10, 2009, at 12:41 AM, PGNet Dev wrote:
if, in fact, solr's the better performance solution, i hope that the
IMAP compliance might, somehow, get addressed -- either from the
Dovecot side, the MUAs, or both.
The lack of IMAP compliance isn't really as serious as you seem to
think. Almo
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There are a few internal special-case services and type specifies what type
> it is. So with type=config Dovecot knows that to reload configuration it
> needs to connect to that service.
ok. current master.conf uses type(s)={auth-source, co
On Oct 10, 2009, at 3:57 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
@2.0's master.conf, there's, e.g.,
service config {
type= config
executable =config
unix_listener {
path = config
mode = 0666
}
}
can someone please explain function/usage for the 'type', 'executable'
& 'path' fields?
There are a few inte
@2.0's master.conf, there's, e.g.,
service config {
type= config
executable =config
unix_listener {
path = config
mode = 0666
}
}
can someone please explain function/usage for the 'type', 'executable'
& 'path' fields?
and, for any file paths, are the presumed to be _relative_ to
On 10/10/2009 06:43 PM Ντελάκης Δημήτριος wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
> I am new with dovecot and i am trying to setup a simple mbox with quotas
> setup. Here is my configuration.
>
> dovecot -c /etc/dovecot.conf -n
> # 1.2.6: /etc/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 2.6.21 i686 Fedora Core release 6 (Zod
Hello list,
I am new with dovecot and i am trying to setup a simple mbox with quotas
setup. Here is my configuration.
dovecot -c /etc/dovecot.conf -n
# 1.2.6: /etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.21 i686 Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) ext3
log_path: /var/log/mail/dovecot
protocols: imap pop3
ssl:
thanks, as i noted i am using rsync v3, so the problem lies elsewhere
(maybe the ',' character?). i ended up starting an rsync daemon on
the remote server and using that. so far so good. i can't say too
many nice things about cifs, but it's a necessary evil here.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:0
On 10/10/2009, Andreas Ntaflos (d...@dword.org) wrote:
> Ok, I'll get on it and create a HOWTO in the Dovecot wiki, based on my
> internal documentation. I will have to organise my thoughts a bit first,
> though :)
Cool! I'll be a test case for it... I have finally gotten the go ahead
to repl
On Saturday 10 October 2009 14:33:16 Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/10/2009 3:14 AM, Nikolai K. Bochev wrote:
> >> What exactly do you mean by archiving?
> >>
> >> We use Postfix and Dovecot to backup any sent and received mail
> >> for our users.
> >
> > Could you show us an example how do you do t
On Saturday 10 October 2009 13:34:39 dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
> I mean every single email sent and recieved is kept for a period of
> time (3 -5 years) separate from users mail, and emails cant be
> deleted. Ideally emails would have compression, mailboxes need to be
> searchable
On 10/10/2009 3:14 AM, Nikolai K. Bochev wrote:
>> What exactly do you mean by archiving?
>>
>> We use Postfix and Dovecot to backup any sent and received mail for our
>> users.
> Could you show us an example how do you do this ? I'm really
> interested in such solution.
Same here... !
In fac
I mean every single email sent and recieved is kept for a period of
time (3 -5 years) separate from users mail, and emails cant be
deleted. Ideally emails would have compression, mailboxes need to be
searchable easily, and some mechanism whereby attachments sent to
multiple people only get
Could you show us an example how do you do this ? I'm really intersted in such
solution.
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Ntaflos"
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 8:30:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] mail archiving
On Friday 09 October 2009 17:18:53 dhottin...@h
21 matches
Mail list logo
