Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:20:18PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > > Ok.. this is not too good, you should have many other entries too, > > several starting with host/ and CCIMAP$. > > The suggestion to remove the computer object (and the 'imapCcimap' user > I bound the SPN to using ktpass) and 'net

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 15:35 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > NP, if you have success consider making a HOWTO for the dovcot wikki > :) For sure. > Ok.. this is not too good, you should have many other entries too, > several starting with host/ and CCIMAP$. The suggestion to remove the computer o

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Thomas
Hi Timo, http://dovecot.org/tmp/example-config/ [..] - master.conf needs more comments - mail.conf is kind of bloated, wonder if I could do something about it Great. It's really nice like that. You might use numbers as prefixes if you want to keep a kind of priority for dovecot or usually

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:21:47PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:24 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > Ouch, can you go a little more slowly, please? I think I've joined the > > > domain OK: > > > Sure.. > > Many thanks for taking the time on this - it is appreciated.

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:24 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Ouch, can you go a little more slowly, please? I think I've joined the > > domain OK: > Sure.. Many thanks for taking the time on this - it is appreciated. > Also verify that 'hostname -f' returns what you want. Very important. Yep

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot POP question

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 15:00 -0600, CJ Keist wrote: > Quick question, > Have dovecot 1.1.16. Does Dovecot's POP handle sub folders? No, but for v1.2 see http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual#Virtual_POP3_INBOX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Dovecot] Dovecot POP question

2009-08-31 Thread CJ Keist
Quick question, Have dovecot 1.1.16. Does Dovecot's POP handle sub folders? -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.ke...@colostate.edu UNIX/Network ManagerPhone: 970-491-0630 Engineering Network ServicesFax: 970-491-5569 College of Engineering, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:33 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > In Dovecot v2.0 I'm splitting dovecot-example.conf to multiple files. > It's probably annoying to have tons of dovecot-*-example.conf files, so > what do you think about: > > 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dov

Re: [Dovecot] Active IMAP sessions per server?

2009-08-31 Thread Nathan M
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Brent Bloxam wrote: > Hi, > > I'm curious about some of the larger dovecot installs out there and what > your current active user load looks like per server. Realistically, how many > active IMAP sessions are some of you maintaining? At what point did you find > th

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
How about this: http://dovecot.org/tmp/example-config/ or the same in: http://dovecot.org/tmp/example-config.tar.gz - master.conf needs more comments - mail.conf is kind of bloated, wonder if I could do something about it signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 07:23:22PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 14:29 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > The kerberos setup is pretty easy.. 'net ads join' your server, go > > into the adsi editor and provide a imap and smtp SPN for the host, use > > 'net ads keytab' to put

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Dovecot. You wrote 31 августа 2009 г., 20:33:57: > 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dovecot > (that's what most distros do anyway) Yes! > 2. Install *.conf files to $sysconfdir/example/ without the "-example" > part in any of the config files. And yes! --

[Dovecot] Smartsieve patch on Dovecot wiki?

2009-08-31 Thread Ronald Johnson
<>

[Dovecot] Active IMAP sessions per server?

2009-08-31 Thread Brent Bloxam
Hi, I'm curious about some of the larger dovecot installs out there and what your current active user load looks like per server. Realistically, how many active IMAP sessions are some of you maintaining? At what point did you find the load became unmanageable? I know there's a lot of different

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2007 w/SPA, Active Directory (was NTLM failures with an interesting twist)

2009-08-31 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 14:29 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > The kerberos setup is pretty easy.. 'net ads join' your server, go > into the adsi editor and provide a imap and smtp SPN for the host, use > 'net ads keytab' to put the imap and smtp SPNs in the system keytab, > and then you are good to

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 19:51 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:28:50PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > # main config, basically says !include conf.d/*.conf > > /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > > > > # the actual configs > > /etc/dovecot/conf.d/*.conf > > > Why in another subdi

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:28:50PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > # main config, basically says !include conf.d/*.conf > /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > > # the actual configs > /etc/dovecot/conf.d/*.conf Why in another subdir? Why not everything in /etc/dovecot? Also, conf.d sounds so Linuxy. :-)

[Dovecot] dovecot-auth segfault with vpopmail 5.5.0 on amd64

2009-08-31 Thread Lawrence
Seeing dovecot-auth segfault on amd64 dovecot is 1.2.4 pertinent details below: ldd /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffef1fe000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x7fe8e6bae000) libvpopmail.so => /usr/lib/libvpopmail.so (0x

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:31 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Yeah, maybe that's better. $datarootdir/dovecot/example-config/ No, $docdir/example-config/ of course, e.g. /usr/share/doc/dovecot/example-config/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 14:17 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > 2. Install *.conf files to $sysconfdir/example/ without the "-example" > > part in any of the config files. > > > > So new installations would then start with "mv example/* ." > > However, I don't think anywhere under /etc is the b

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:31 -0430, Julio C. Ortega wrote: > I'll would like to see a config dir like /etc/dovecot.d, and, inside it > something like: > > network.example > namespaces.example > logging.example > protocols.example > security.example > plugins.example Hmm. I kind of like it, except

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Seg, 31 Ago 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote: In Dovecot v2.0 I'm splitting dovecot-example.conf to multiple files. It's probably annoying to have tons of dovecot-*-example.conf files, so what do you think about: 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dovecot (that's what most

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julio C. Ortega said the following on 31/08/09 19:01: > But if i got to choose only from the two that you listed, i'll go for > option 2. IMHO the best solution is the Apache way: you can have either a monolithic httpd.conf file, or you can #include

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Julio C. Ortega
El 31/08/09 12:03, Timo Sirainen escribió: > In Dovecot v2.0 I'm splitting dovecot-example.conf to multiple files. > It's probably annoying to have tons of dovecot-*-example.conf files, so > what do you think about: > > 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dovecot > (that's

[Dovecot] v2.0 configuration paths

2009-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen
In Dovecot v2.0 I'm splitting dovecot-example.conf to multiple files. It's probably annoying to have tons of dovecot-*-example.conf files, so what do you think about: 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dovecot (that's what most distros do anyway) 2. Install *.conf files

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas ignored on INBOX only

2009-08-31 Thread Random Monkey
I think this is a bug in the 1.1.11 version bundled with ubuntu 9.0.4 I have switched back to an older version and quotas are now working fine.   Thanks.

[Dovecot] Dovecot Erros in Logs

2009-08-31 Thread David Cunningham
Different Error today: Aug 31 08:01:05 IMAP(user-folder): Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed Aug 31 08:01:05 IMAP(user-folder): Error: Raw backtrace: imap [0x49d0c8] -> imap [0x49db63] -> imap [0x49d386] -> imap [0x4a79bb] -> imap [0x49b3f5] -> imap(buffer_write+0x72) [

Re: [Dovecot] expire plugin: columns not uniq

2009-08-31 Thread Nikita Koshikov
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:33:15 -0400 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:27 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > CREATE TRIGGER mergeexpire BEFORE INSERT ON expires FOR EACH ROW > > > BEGIN > > > UPDATE expires SET expire_stamp=NEW.expire_stamp > > > WHERE username = NEW.user

Re: [Dovecot] Quick and dirty server optimized for IMAP upload speed?

2009-08-31 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/30/2009 11:34 PM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>> The two biggest real bottlenecks: >>> - Thunderbird is just slow at uploading to IMAP. With a bunch of >>> small msgs it only does a few per second and you can tell the server is >>> waiting for something to do. >> Did you try TBird 3.0b3? It has ma