On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
..
<<>@domain1.com>
Stephen
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yeah, it was fixed a week after my mail:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.1/rev/49537bad6797
Hello,
Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
It was mentioned in a previous thread before:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-December/035753.html
Basically the vacation system is useless, most mail servers with anti-spam
are rejecting the vacation replies because the sender isn't a vali
Thanks Timo for putting up the .pdf and .ppt files for your talk at www.dovecot.org/talks
.
Is there a video or audio file of it?
Thanks,
James.
Hello,
is there a way to configure plugin "autocreate" per domain? Like:
For domain xwz.com i want to autocreate folders: Models and Clients
For domain yxw.com i want to autocreate folders: Adm and Tech
Thanks.
Hi,
> > > I am using dovecot with postfix for authentication.
> > >
> > > Everything (TLS/SSL, authentication) is working fine, except that when
> > > I set:
> > >
> > > disable_plaintext_auth = yes
> > >
> > > I still can authenticate with plain text on a no TLS/SSL session:
> > >
> > > 2
Hi,
> > I am using dovecot with postfix for authentication.
> >
> > Everything (TLS/SSL, authentication) is working fine, except that when
> > I set:
> >
> > disable_plaintext_auth = yes
> >
> > I still can authenticate with plain text on a no TLS/SSL session:
> >
> > 20 mail2.cs.ait.ac.th
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
Hello list,
My question: is sieve support some kind of "continue" action, to explicit tell
server processing rules below current one(if current has triged)?
Situation:
I have few rules, which fileinto's to different directories. All is working
fine, but if I want redi
Stephan Bosch schreef:
jsech...@gmx.ch schreef:
hi,
I had two problems with deliver / sieve.
First one is not reproducible anymore.
[..]
2009-07-29 18:15:37 deliver(xxx): Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc():
stack frame changed
This message tells me I committed a Dovecot API crime. I thought
well, I thought I had the official tarball, but the
dovecot-latest.tar.gz compiled fine..
thanks.
Jason
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:33 -0400, Jason Welsh wrote:
>
>> if test "$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
>> make "$target-am" || exit 1; \
>> fi; test -z "$fail"
>> make: Fat
jsech...@gmx.ch schreef:
hi,
I had two problems with deliver / sieve.
First one is not reproducible anymore.
[..]
2009-07-29 18:15:37 deliver(xxx): Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack
frame changed
This message tells me I committed a Dovecot API crime. I thought I fixed
all of these. I
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:04 +0200, Ralf Becker wrote:
> Jul 29 10:38:27 trevi mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(beckerr):
> fchown(/u/f0/rzuser/beckerr/Mail/.subscriptions.lock, -1, -1)
> failed: Invalid argument
..
> I located the bug in src/lib/file-dotlock.c ... a patch is attached.
> - if (fd
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 08:59 +0200, Christian Felsing wrote:
> I experienced a strange effect after updating from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 with
> Horde. IMP 4.3.4 had problems with GnuPG handling while Dovecot 1.2.1
> was installed, but IMP 4.3.3 had no problems.
>
> Now I updated to Dovecot 1.2.2 and IMP 4.
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:33 -0400, Jason Welsh wrote:
> if test "$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
> make "$target-am" || exit 1; \
> fi; test -z "$fail"
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
> Current working directory /scratch/jawelsh/src/dovecot-1.2.2/src
> *** Error code 1
>
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Tom Hendrikx schreef:
> BTW, before I fixed your bug I had the same error for the above reason.
> But, as you may have noticed, that error is wrong, since you are using
> :global. I've committed a fix for that already:
>
> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-1.2-sieve/rev/449d8ec
It's working
A lot of thanks, Steffen!
My problem was a "Kaspersky Internet Security".
It has a "network traffic control" function and option "check SSL
connection", if this option checked - everything work, if not checked -
don't work.
Best regards, Sergey.
- Original Message -
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:25 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
3 UID FETCH 13608 (BODY[HEADER])
* 30 FETCH (UID 13608 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent impflag0) BODY[HEADER] {2529} ...
..
FYI, I am using dovecot 1.2.1 on archlinux (they haven't upgraded the
package to 1.2.2 yet, but
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:25 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Not reproducible every time, but every so often, after viewing an
unseen message, I am seeing the first non-system flag set on the
message without an intervening STORE call.
mbox or maildir?
Sorry about tha
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:25 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> 3 UID FETCH 13608 (BODY[HEADER])
> * 30 FETCH (UID 13608 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent impflag0) BODY[HEADER] {2529} ...
..
> FYI, I am using dovecot 1.2.1 on archlinux (they haven't upgraded the
> package to 1.2.2 yet, but I didn't see anythi
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:25 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> Not reproducible every time, but every so often, after viewing an
> unseen message, I am seeing the first non-system flag set on the
> message without an intervening STORE call.
mbox or maildir?
signature.asc
Description: This i
Not reproducible every time, but every so often, after viewing an
unseen message, I am seeing the first non-system flag set on the
message without an intervening STORE call.
Here's an example:
2 EXAMINE "XXX" (QRESYNC (1165391112 78
12160:12162,12168:12171,12173,12178,12183,12191,12360,124
hi,
I had two problems with deliver / sieve.
First one is not reproducible anymore.
Im using debian unstable (amd64), often dist-upgraded, with some experimental
stuff too (wine i think).
The first basically triggered a backtrace when confronted an email with
spammassassins report headers prep
I'm trying to implement a shared mailbox: in other words, we have a
generic email address ("security@") which we want a number of users to be
able to monitor. The problem I have is that users can see folders under
that shared mailbox but can't see the INBOX.
All the users in question have their ow
On 7/29/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
>> If its a Cisco PIX, diable the 'smtp fixup' crap that breaks smtp...
> What has the Cisco PIX "smtp fixup" feature got to do with IMAP STARTTLS?
Obviously, nothing... ;)
Sorry, wrong list (I'm on the postfix list and this is a comm
Hi Timo,
Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see user
names.
Charles Marcus schrieb:
> On 7/29/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
>> Do you have a Cisco Firewall/IDS or a software firewall running
>> between your client and Dovecot? If so, try to disable it for a test.
>>
>> Some firewalls don't understand that after STARTTLS they ha
On 29.07.2009 18:14, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to authenticate using GSSAPI, but getting this in dovecot.log
"authn_name and authz_name differ: not supported". What is actually
trying to say me? I've remeber once encounter this problem but it get
away silently.
I'm using Mozilla Th
On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Jose Celestino wrote:
Well said. Truth is i'm for a long time trying to find out what kind
of
vodka Timo drinks.
I don't really, except maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmiakki_Koskenkorva
:)
hi
i have virtual users stored in ldap server and i must to do some
modifications that requiere to chage mail_location value...
the solution comes to use the "uid" value stored in ldap server for users on
mail_location parameter...
i can see in http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables that i can't do
On Qua, 2009-07-29 at 11:22 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
> I purely love that kind of crap. As if presentations meant anything, as
> if there aren't all kinds of scholarly work about theoretical perfect
> world algorithms and conceptual systems that will never be implemented
> and are as practica
Amen to that! I wholeheartedly agree...
Sincerely,
- Wouter van der Schagt
--
From: "Stewart Dean"
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:22 PM
To: "Steffen Kaiser" ; "Timo Sirainen"
; "Dovecot Mailing List"
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Some people asked m
Hello Stephan,
First of all, thank you for dovecot-sieve implementation.
I see that you are adding X-Sieve header to all outgoing e-mail in
cmd-redirect.c
/* Prepend sieve version header (should not affect signatures) */
rfc2822_header_field_write(f, "X-Sieve", SIEVE_IMPLEMENTATION);
How do y
I purely love that kind of crap. As if presentations meant anything, as
if there aren't all kinds of scholarly work about theoretical perfect
world algorithms and conceptual systems that will never be implemented
and are as practical and effective as wings on a pig. Please.
I'm reminded of t
On Jul 29, 2009, at 5:39 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of
some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
IMO You should place all slides and conference papers online - at
least I did not found th
On 7/29/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
> Do you have a Cisco Firewall/IDS or a software firewall running
> between your client and Dovecot? If so, try to disable it for a test.
>
> Some firewalls don't understand that after STARTTLS they have to stop
> listening / chec
Hello list,
My question: is sieve support some kind of "continue" action, to explicit tell
server processing rules below current one(if current has triged)?
Situation:
I have few rules, which fileinto's to different directories. All is working
fine, but if I want redirect all my mail for some p
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> Robert Schetterer schrieb:
>> Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
>>> Robert Schetterer schrieb:
>>>
if you get problems with sieve dovecot
try http://www.woozle.org/~neale/src/pysieved/
>>> exactly the same behavior: ingo complains "driver not in transaction
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Рачков Сергей wrote:
I have a problem with STARTTLS, with imaps all ok.
Do you have a Cisco Firewall/IDS or a software firewall running between
your client and Dovecot? If so, try to disable it for a test.
Some firewalls do
Hello,
I'm trying to authenticate using GSSAPI, but getting this in dovecot.log
"authn_name and authz_name differ: not supported". What is actually
trying to say me? I've remeber once encounter this problem but it get
away silently.
I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird 3 beta 3 and Dovecot 1.0.15
On Qua, 29 Jul 2009, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I am using dovecot with postfix for authentication.
Everything (TLS/SSL, authentication) is working fine, except that when
I set:
disable_plaintext_auth = yes
I still can authenticate with plain text on a no TLS/SSL session:
20 mail2.cs.
if test "$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
make "$target-am" || exit 1; \
fi; test -z "$fail"
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
Current working directory /scratch/jawelsh/src/dovecot-1.2.2/src
*** Error code 1
The following command caused the error:
failcom='exit 1'; \
for f i
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> Robert Schetterer schrieb:
>
>> if you get problems with sieve dovecot
>> try http://www.woozle.org/~neale/src/pysieved/
>
> exactly the same behavior: ingo complains "driver not in transaction
> state" ...
>
> Seems as if ingo fails to even contact port 2000 ...
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> if you get problems with sieve dovecot
> try http://www.woozle.org/~neale/src/pysieved/
exactly the same behavior: ingo complains "driver not in transaction
state" ...
Seems as if ingo fails to even contact port 2000 ... any idea on how to
debug ingo itself?
Stefan
Hi
I have a problem with STARTTLS, with imaps all ok.
I have tried to connect to server with different clients (thunderbird, the
bat, mulberry) and had same result.
Thunderbird log for example:
0[284708]: 25c0e08:192.168.4.200:NA:SetupWithUrl: clearing
IMAP_CONNECTION_IS_OPEN
1920[25c77c8]:
> This file probably isn't in the right place. It needs to be in each
> maildir under the publicfolders/ directory (i.e. where the
> dovecot-uidlist files are also).
Thanks Timo.
That seems to work, which in turn suggests that the directory listing in
the second code example at http://wiki.doveco
Tom Hendrikx schreef:
Applied and tested. sieved and sieve-test now complain with an error
message, but everything seems to function when run from within dovecot.
Error: sieve: include: sieve_dir and home not set (wanted script spam.sieve)
Error: failed to load binary: .default.svbin
I'll wait
Stephan Bosch schreef:
> Tom Hendrikx schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After upgrading from dovecot 1.1 to dovecot 1.2.2 and the new sieve
>> implementation (0.1.9), I'm having some strange problems. I'm including
>> some general purpose scripts into my user script from sieve_global_dir.
>>
>> After some test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
IMO You should place all slides and conference papers online - at
least I did not found them on dov
Christian Felsing schrieb:
> I experienced a strange effect after updating from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 with
> Horde. IMP 4.3.4 had problems with GnuPG handling while Dovecot 1.2.1
> was installed, but IMP 4.3.3 had no problems.
>
> Now I updated to Dovecot 1.2.2 and IMP 4.3.4 is also running flawless :-)
Hi Timo,
today I found this in the logs again:
Jul 29 10:38:27 trevi mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(beckerr):
fchown(/u/f0/rzuser/beckerr/Mail/.subscriptions.lock, -1, -1)
failed: Invalid argument
Jul 29 10:38:27 trevi mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(beckerr):
file_dotlock_open() failed with subsc
Thanks a lot for all the answers. We already have high availability on
the storage, so we'll go with Timo's proposal, mainly because it's the
closer one to our current situation.
Thanks!
El Sábado 25 Julio 2009 a las 01:58, Timo Sirainen escribió:
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Joseba Torre wr
I experienced a strange effect after updating from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 with
Horde. IMP 4.3.4 had problems with GnuPG handling while Dovecot 1.2.1
was installed, but IMP 4.3.3 had no problems.
Now I updated to Dovecot 1.2.2 and IMP 4.3.4 is also running flawless :-)
Is that an known issue ?
Christian
51 matches
Mail list logo
