Tom Hendrikx schreef:
> Charles Marcus schreef:
>> On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
Enough, I'm really only interested in further responses if someone
actually wants to respond to the subject of the message.
>>> Here you go:
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276480
>> Thanks f
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:02 +0200, Jernej Porenta wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Another issue when building 1.2.2 that wasn't there with 1.2.1 is that
"-lsocket" seems
to be missing causing linking errors. One example:
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/cd29b745c8d
On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Brad wrote:
Jul 20 20:34:38 warden dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth
attempts): rip=80.237.136.4, lip=80.237.235.10, TLS handshaking: SS
L_accept() failed: error:03078041:bignum
routines:BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL:malloc failure
However, deleting the ssl-parameter
On Monday 20 July 2009 15:15:29 Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 18.04.2009 22:31, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> > On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:26 +0200, Christian Rueger wrote:
> >> dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=Y.Y.Y.Y,
> >> lip=X.X.X.X, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:0
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:56 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> # ls -l /home/publicfolders/dovecot-shared
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 publicfolders publicfolders 0 2009-07-27
>15:01 /home/publicfolders/dovecot-shared
This file probably isn't in the right place. It needs to be in each
maildir under the publicfol
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:14 +0100, Guy wrote:
> I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
> version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
> climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
> any given time. The load on the server also c
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:02 +0200, Jernej Porenta wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> Another issue when building 1.2.2 that wasn't there with 1.2.1 is that
> >> "-lsocket" seems
> >> to be missing causing linking errors. One example:
> >
> > Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/cd29b745c8d
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 23:42 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi Timo,
> all of my tests fail
> with expire plugin, mail simply not get deleted
> i cant find any stuff in the logs why it does not or should not work.
Try with 1.2.2 and check the mails' save dates now that you have the
FETCH X-SAVE
Is that a normal HFS+ filesystem?
Yup.
Anything special done to it?
Nope.
With case-insensitive filenames?
Yup.
Have you tried my imaptest tool (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest) to
see if it gives errors?
I'll try that soon and let you know.
BTW. Is there some really easy way to get
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 08:23 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> There is still lots of "noise" in the log though. The attached perl
> script just sends and retrieves mail over and over:
..
> When run against a Mac OS X server with dovecot-1.1.16 and dovecot's
> deliver via postfix, there are lots of e
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 17:00 +, Diego Roversi wrote:
You shouldn't need more than one namespace. Try something like:
mail_location = maildir:~/Mail:INBOX=~/Mail/inbox:LAYOUT=fs
And only a single namespace.
Looks like it works:
b LIST "" *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:22 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Ed W wrote:
> > I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
> > (before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
> > using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
> > loa
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz.sig
Updated ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18-managesieve-0.10.7.diff.gz
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18-manag
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz.sig
Refreshed ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2-managesieve-0.11.7.diff.gz
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2-manages
Ed W wrote:
> I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
> (before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
> using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
> loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't not
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't notice
and the othe
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Let me state it again: nothing is gained with server-side *de*cryption
which can't be achieved more easily with disk encryption. Werver-side
encryption is another thing...
One use case is where you have regulatory or policy determination that
certain email should be
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Ed W wrote:
per host (current situation is rather difficult... I'm using a cert
with multiple names on it, but this is hard to buy)
What expieriences do you have on client-side with those certs?
I tried
On 7/27/2009 11:43 AM, Ed W wrote:
>> A quick google shows: http://tiny.pl/hhc4k
> Writing a decent ebuild from scratch which is good enough to be accepted
> IS fairly tricky, but the good news is a "good enough" one is fairly
> straightforward.
Hi Ed,
Thanks very much for your detailed reply...
Mario Antonio wrote:
> If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
> Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
> What would you recommend?
> Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
> Use Backports Version 1.1.13 (1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1)
> Do y
Hi list
I'm trying to set up shared public folders with individual SEEN flags.
I've set up three test users, but as soon as one of them marks a mail in
the public folder as seen or unseen, that change is propagated to all
three users. If I watch the dovecot.index.log file in each user's
directory
Charles Marcus wrote:
A quick google shows: http://tiny.pl/hhc4k
Hi Charles
Writing a decent ebuild from scratch which is good enough to be accepted
IS fairly tricky, but the good news is a "good enough" one is fairly
straightforward.
Actually the whole thing sounds more grandiose than
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> Hello, dovecot-users ...
>
> as you may read at
>
> http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/Week-of-Mon-20090706/037786.html
>
> I am stuck getting dovecot-sieve working with the ingo-application of
> the horde-framework.
>
> To me it seems as if ingo doesn't even
On Monday 27 July 2009 16:21:53 Stephan Bosch wrote:
> > or Use any of the packages from:
> > Dovecot v1.2 for Debian Testing (binary and source):
> >
> > deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
> > deb-src http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
> > -
Hello, dovecot-users ...
as you may read at
http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/Week-of-Mon-20090706/037786.html
I am stuck getting dovecot-sieve working with the ingo-application of
the horde-framework.
To me it seems as if ingo doesn't even trigger any request/command to
managesieve ... I
Mario Antonio wrote:
If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
What would you recommend?
Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
This version is ancient. The last release is 13 months old. M
If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
What would you recommend?
Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
Use Backports Version 1.1.13 (1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1)
or Use any of the packages from:
--
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Another issue when building 1.2.2 that wasn't there with 1.2.1 is that
"-lsocket" seems
to be missing causing linking errors. One example:
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/cd29b745c8dd
It is not working for me. "-lrt" is already set before checking
clock_gett
- kernel
r...@stoat:/# uname -a
Linux stoat.aluminati.org 2.6.24-23-server #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 01:36:05
UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- the output of "dovecot --build-options"
This is from the current 1.1.18 install, but 1.2 was compiled with the
same configuration options, so they should be the sam
I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
any given time. The load on the server also climbed to 150+.
I've reverted back to 1.1.18, which
Hi,
I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
any given time. The load on the server also climbed to 150+.
I've reverted back to 1.1.18, wh
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:12:44 -0400
> Von: Charles Marcus
> An: Dovecot Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Gentoo overlay?
> On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
> >> Enough, I'm really only interested in further responses if someone
> >> actually want
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:32:43 -0400
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 7/27/2009 6:22 AM, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in
> > dovecot.conf
>
> mail_max_userip_connections = 10
> Maximum number of IMAP connections allowed for a user from e
On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:06 AM, Peter Eriksson wrote:
"mech-gssapi.c", line 276: undefined symbol: gss_mech_krb5
"mech-gssapi.c", line 276: warning: improper pointer/integer
combination: arg #2
..
"gss_mech_krb5" is not a valid variable on Solaris.
Oh, there are more GSSAPI implementations than
On 7/27/2009 6:22 AM, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in dovecot.conf
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
Maximum number of IMAP connections allowed for a user from each IP
address. NOTE: The username is compared case-sensitively.
--
Charles Marcus schreef:
> On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
>>> Enough, I'm really only interested in further responses if someone
>>> actually wants to respond to the subject of the message.
>
>> Here you go:
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276480
>
> Thanks for trying, but that is n
Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in dovecot.conf
Regards,
BTJ
--
---
Bjørn T Johansen
b...@havleik.no
-
On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
>> Enough, I'm really only interested in further responses if someone
>> actually wants to respond to the subject of the message.
> Here you go:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276480
Thanks for trying, but that is not an overlay, it is just an ebuild,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz.sig
>
> Found and fixes several v1.2-specific bugs. Hopefully it's now stable
> for most people's usage.
>
> * GSSAPI: More changes to authentication. Hopefully g
On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Guy wrote:
We have the users total quota in MySQL along with a number of grace
days (counts up to 7). The amount of space used is stored in
maildirsize in the users maildir.
What we currently some bits of voodoo which allow the user to go up to
200% of their quota. W
Hi guys,
I already use Dovecot for imap/pop3 with some simple quota options.
I'm starting to look at the switch from maildrop to dovecot lda and
I'm wondering whether it's possible to do our unusual quota management
with the quota plugin.
We have the users total quota in MySQL along with a number
Hi Timo,
thanks for your time and analysis.
We upgraded our dovecot installations to
# dovecot --version
1.1.13
(Debian Lenny backport package) and the problem went away. It might have
been due to our particular infrastructure, now luckily it's working fine.
Regards,
Sandro
Timo Sirainen wrote
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
OK, that definitely means something's either deleting dovecot-uidlist
files or changing that mailbox's index files in some way, which then
causes the UIDVALIDITY changed errors and/or next_uid changed errors.
Neither should really be happening
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The problem is most likely that since you're using LAYOUT=fs, gtd/ is
> accessible using both namespaces. Change the virtual to something
> like:
>
> location = virtual:~/res/gtd
Excellent, that did the trick! Many thanks,
t
* Timo Sirainen :
> ># zfgrep -h virus-al /var/log/OLD/2009-07-*/pop3d-imapd.log |grep
> >UIDVALIDITY
> >Jul 2 02:27:19 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al): Maildir /home/v/i/
> >virus-al/Maildir: UIDVALIDITY changed (1246493487 -> 1246494049)
> >Jul 2 22:25:34 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al): Maild
Timo Sirainen schrieb am 27.07.2009 08:54:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:49 +0200, Ralf Becker wrote:
>> "settings.c", line 132.31: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier GLOB_BRACE.
>>
>> This is because AIX glob doesn't support GLOB_BRACE :-|
>
> Should have known.. Solaris is also broken, but BSDs ar
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Timo Sirainen :
Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir,
though.
Do you have any "UIDVALIDITY change
* Timo Sirainen :
> Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
> recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir, though.
> Do you have any "UIDVALIDITY changed" lines in logs?
# zfgrep -h virus-al /var/log/OLD/20
49 matches
Mail list logo
