On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:19 PM, FraNL wrote:
dovecot: Jul 25 02:00:26 Error: POP3(u...@mydomain.tld):
file_dotlock_open() failed with file
/var/mail/vhosts/mydomain.tld/user/dovecot.index.log: Permission
denied
dovecot: Jul 25 02:00:26 Error: POP3(u...@mydomain.tld):
file_dotlock_open(/var/mail/
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:55 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:56 Error: Temporary failure in creating login
processes, slowing down for now
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:56 Error: imap-login: USER environment missing
The only reason w
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:19 PM, FraNL wrote:
If this message again appear as new message - my apologies, but then
a bit
more info on "how to reply on the mailing list" would be appreciated.
The problem with the version number is solved.
Not really..
Solution:
1. # rpm -e dovecot
2. Remove ma
If this message again appear as new message - my apologies, but then a bit
more info on "how to reply on the mailing list" would be appreciated.
The problem with the version number is solved.
Solution:
1. # rpm -e dovecot
2. Remove manually all files and directories called dovecot or something
wit
On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Joseba Torre wrote:
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2
On Jul 24, 2009, at 6:58 PM, A. van Harten wrote:
Tried that, same result.
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:41 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
If it's logging this, it means you have v1.0 binaries around. If rpm -
e dovecot didn't remove it, something else will. I can't really help
you there.
Anyw
Tried that, same result.
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:41 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: Temporary failure in creating login
processes, slowing down for now
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: imap-login: USER environment missing
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: imap-login: US
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 00:07 +0200, FraNL wrote:
> Running OS: CentOS 5.3 (2.6.18-128.2.1.el5)
>
> 1.
> My Linux distribution comes with Dovecot 1.0.7. After trying to make it
> running, I encoutnered many problems. So I decided to upgrade to 1.2.1.
> When running dovecot -r from CLI, it returns wi
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:25 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
> Yes, I'm talking about Trash.lock files, not seeing any errors in the
> log files related with lock files.
Can you look at what Dovecot is doing while those .lock files exist? You
can get the process pid from the .lock file and then do:
truss
Yes, I'm talking about Trash.lock files, not seeing any errors in the
log files related with lock files.
Yes, I am using dovecot deliver. So does that mean I should not set
mbox_very_dirty_syncs to yes?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:55 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I have doveco
Hi,
Running OS: CentOS 5.3 (2.6.18-128.2.1.el5)
1.
My Linux distribution comes with Dovecot 1.0.7. After trying to make it
running, I encoutnered many problems. So I decided to upgrade to 1.2.1.
When running dovecot -r from CLI, it returns with version 1.2.1.
But at the top of the log file it say
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:55 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
> I have dovecot 1.1.16 running on Solaris 10. We are seeing problem with
> lock files taking forever to be removed after opening a email folder
> like Trash with several thousand messages in them. We use mbox format.
You mean dotlock files (
I have dovecot 1.1.16 running on Solaris 10. We are seeing problem with
lock files taking forever to be removed after opening a email folder
like Trash with several thousand messages in them. We use mbox format.
All users inbox's are local to the mail server, and all other users mail
folder
On 20/07/2009 09:36, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 03:48:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>> From: to...@tuxteam.de
>>> We do agree that local encryption of messages is a Good Thing [...]
>
>>> Did I forget anything?
>> I think that's a pretty good summary of the situation. W
On 19/07/2009 16:03, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 03:48:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt
(t200...@fjl.co.uk) wrote:
>
>> Encrypting the whole disk is good if the server gets pinched. My servers
are
>> behind several layers of hi-tech locks with permanent security guards on
the
>> d
Joseba Torre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
> available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
> server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
> delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
when they get moved to a different servers, etc.. But is this a real
issue? Maybe not.
I agree to that it is no issue.
Maybe, deliver should get a new option, e.g.:
- -X fake_hostname
Bye.
- --
Steffe
Hello,
My "exim" is doing the deliveries, "dovecot" handles POP/IMAP.
Exim Log shows:
2009-07-24 14:03:40 1MUJUy-0001Jr-B0 == u...@domain.tu-berlin.de R=maildir_user
T=maildir_delivery defer (2): No such file or directory: while opening or
reading /var/Mail/Boxes/u/user/maildirsize
2009-07-2
Joseba Torre schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
> available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
> server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
> delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB R
On 7/24/2009 1:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
mail_location: maildir:/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root:LAYOUT=fs
>>> Append :INBOX=/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root
>> Hey, thanks, worked perfectly. I just rechecked the wiki, and this is
>> not mentioned at all, should it be added? The on
Hi,
dovecot's imap process segfaults when I search a virtual mailbox using
the fts_squat plugin. Is this supposed to work, or a known bug?
I've seen some changes commited to fts_solr a couple of months ago
that where supposed to fix search issues on virtual mailboxes, maybe
fts_squat needs to be f
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and dual P4
Xeon 3,2GHz).
Our
22 matches
Mail list logo