Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Matt Rude wrote:
>
>> Error: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so)
>> failed:
>> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
>> capability_string
>
> This is the problem e-frog mentioned in
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Matt Rude wrote:
Error: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/
lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so) failed:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so: undefined
symbol:
capability_string
This is the problem e-frog mentioned in previous mail.
http://dovecot.or
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 19:42 -0500, Matt Rude wrote:
>> dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so) failed:
>> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
>> mountpoint_get
>
> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6f36829c9e0e
>
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 22:02 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Sorry for replying so late, the server running Dovecot succumbed to a
> hardware problem. Now that the machine is online again, I applied your
> patch. Running the expire tool now causes the following log messages:
>
> dict: db(secondary
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 15:35 +0200, e-frog wrote:
> $ /usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext expire-tool --test
> Info: Trash: timestamp 1243963680 (Tue Jun 2 19:28:00 2009
> ) -> 1244307774 (Tue Jun 2 19:28:00 2009
> )
>
> Both human readable timestamps are equal as ctime() returns a pointer
> to a s
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:18 +0200, e-frog wrote:
> Jun 6 14:40:19 server dovecot: IMAP(user): Panic: file virtual-sync.c: line
> 502
> (virtual_sync_mailbox_box_remove): assertion failed: (rec_count >=
> uid_count)
Hmm. This is kind of difficult. Can you reproduce it? What does your
dovec
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:07 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote:
> This is the first and only crash I could find in the logs
> (approx 500k Lines of postfix/dovecot logs)
>
> The following information could be extracted from the logfile (no core
> dump unfortunately)
>
> May 31 02:07:25 apollo
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:26 +0100, Peter Sparkes wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:06 +0100, Peter Sparkes wrote:
> >
> When trying to retrieve email using Dovecot for t...@domaintwo.com the
> password is not recognised although it is for t...@domainone.com.
>
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:48 +0200, Jacopo Cappelli wrote:
> I use dovecot with shadow support and i have a problem with aging password,
> if the password is ended dovecot continue to log me in...
> It's possibile to disable login if the password is ended?
I'm not really planning on adding password
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 17:01 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >From the log:
>
> Jun 5 16:38:46 postamt dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
> method=PLAIN, rip=141.42.142.67, lip=141.42.4.250
> Jun 5 16:38:49 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username): Panic: Trying to sync
> mailbox Sent with open transac
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 19:42 -0500, Matt Rude wrote:
> dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so) failed:
> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
> mountpoint_get
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6f36829c9e0e
signature.asc
Description: Th
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 14:55 -0300, Ezequiel Alfíe wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm confused about LAYOUT=fs...
>
> Does using LAYOUT=fs breaks maildir++ quota, if I use this quota scheme?
I think LAYOUT=fs works with Maildir++ quota as long as you're using
only Dovecot. I haven't tested it though.
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 14:48 -0300, Ezequiel Alfíe wrote:
> What are the steps for correctly setting up shared folders with acls
> if I choose one uid per user?
It's going to be annoyingly difficult.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions describes the
issues, but doesn't really tell
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 22:01 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Is there any way to let me access all three maildirs through dovecot?
> I'm guessing that I can do this with namespaces but I'm not sure. Any
> suggestions and pointers?
Either namespaces or use 3 different user accounts where each user has
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:59 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> authenid = 0x8669189 "*masteruser"
Fixed (also for v1.1):
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6886f1e18c76
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:26 -0500, Romer Ventura wrote:
> It would be nice to have some sort of archiving feature on which
> dovecot can save emails older than N+1 months to either a remote
> Dovecot server with MySQL as storage or a separate instance of
> Dovecot running on the same server b
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 17:49 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> How about a configuration option that's a regex or glob of files to ignore
> in the mail directories?
A plugin could do that. ACL plugin could be used as an example.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 19:45 +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I've just setup Dovecot v1.2.rc5 and switched the mailbox format of one
> account to dbox. Therefor I've created an empty directory, called dbox,
> with access mode 0700, like the user's home directory.
> After the IMAP login wit
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:18 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> mail_executable =
> /usr/local/dovecot-1.2.rc5unpatched/libexec/dovecot/rawlog
> /usr/local/dovecot-1.2.rc5unpatched/libexec/dovecot/imap
>
> # sbin/dovecot -F
> Fio_loop_handle_add: epoll_ctl(1, 0): Operation not permitted
This happens
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:23 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> 2 setacl Sent timo +lrwtsd
> 2 OK Setacl complete.
> 3 setacl Sent timo -lrwtsd
> Aborted (core dumped)
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/01fae3737994
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 20:40 +0200, Michal Szymanski wrote:
> I wonder whether this mixing of dovecot and non-dovecot access can make
> any problems, provide, of course, that the users are not using both ways
> at the same time. AFAIK dovecot makes some indexing. Will it not be
> confused if the fol
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 13:27 -0700, Jeremy Doran wrote:
> It certainly seems to be the 'verbose debug' information that DSpam
> prints to stderr that triggers this.
>
> After testing with the patches from Marcin Rzepecki and Harlan Stenn, I
> managed completely disabled these kind of lines from be
Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> However, I know from looking at the dspam system.log file, the retraining
>> actually happens - so it
>> -does- appear to be calling dspam. It appears that the 'move' operation
>> fails.
>
>> Plugin debug log when I attempt to move a message:
>> Jun 13 09:29:07 s
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:15 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:11 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > The problem is that the istream API doesn't work the way you expect.
> > > Just reading doesn't advance the stream, only calling i_stream_skip() or
> > > i_stream_seek() does that
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:11 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > The problem is that the istream API doesn't work the way you expect.
> > Just reading doesn't advance the stream, only calling i_stream_skip() or
> > i_stream_seek() does that (and o_stream_send_istream() internally). So
> > just remove th
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:08 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Christian has reported an error to me on dovecot 1.0.7, where the
> > following code:
> >
> > 199 if (i_stream_read_data(mailstream, &beginning, &size, 5) < 0 ||
> > 200
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Christian has reported an error to me on dovecot 1.0.7, where the
> following code:
>
> 199 if (i_stream_read_data(mailstream, &beginning, &size, 5) < 0 ||
> 200 size < 5) {
..
> 212 if (o_stream_send(
Timo,
Christian has reported an error to me on dovecot 1.0.7, where the
following code:
199 if (i_stream_read_data(mailstream, &beginning, &size, 5) < 0 ||
200 size < 5) {
201 ret = -1;
202 mail_storage_set_error(t->box->storage,
203
Hello,
I have recently installed Mailscanner/postfix for the mail server and
dovecot for (mainly remote) access to email (via T'bird etc. and/or
Webmail). Most users still use text mail clients (mutt, pine, some still
old elm) while in the office. These clients access mail (both incoming
at /var/m
Dunno how much this applys to a local drive, but:
I run dovecot for about 40k users over nfs. Default install of redhat el5
The version of dovecot shipped with redhat caused all kinds of user
issues, so swapped it out with a pre 1.0 release of dovecot that I
knew was good.
About a year ago
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] enourmous amount of disc writes
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:48:50 +0200
From: Rainer Sigl
To: Ralf Hildebrandt
References: <4a3640c5.1070...@mpe.mpg.de>
<4a364233.6090...@schetterer.org> <4a365913.6030...@mpe.mpg.de>
<20090615142836.gx2
Rainer Sigl schrieb:
> Hi Robert,
> many thanks for your answer!
> Yes I'm aware of the necessity to upgrade the complete system. Beside
> this I wanted to search for a quick solution. Upgrading the system
> entails many other things and is in my eyes not possible on the living
> system.
look for
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Andrew Hearn wrote:
>
>> We occasional see high load peaks on our mail servers - these generally
>> don't only last a few minutes. 'Top' show imap taking the lots of CPU
>> resources, is there a dovecot 'top' like program to show dovecot which
>
I think I mentioned this twice with little response by the DC community,
but here goes a third time. I have things set up so that I can kill
DC, swap in the new executables and restart DC, all in about 4 minutes
or less. And if things go wrong, I can fall back just as fast.
Users don't know t
Hi Richard,
many thanks for you answer.
yes, this solution did we discuss as well. For a future testing system I
will try this. But I can't use it on the living system in the moment.
Regards
Rainer
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
You might also want to enable "noatime" in the mount options for th
Hi Robert,
many thanks for your answer!
Yes I'm aware of the necessity to upgrade the complete system. Beside
this I wanted to search for a quick solution. Upgrading the system
entails many other things and is in my eyes not possible on the living
system.
Did you ever measure the ioactiviy wit
Hi Robert,
many thanks for your answer!
Yes I'm aware of the necessity to upgrade the complete system. Beside
this I wanted to search for a quick solution. Upgrading the system
entails many other things and is in my eyes not possible on the living
system.
Regards
Rainer
Robert Schetterer wro
Hello,
You might also want to enable "noatime" in the mount options for the
volume housing the data... if you're using maildir, this *could* reduce
the number of writes by half, theoretically!
Richard.
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Rainer Sigl schrieb:
>> Hi List,
>> on my mailserver (exim4, dovec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
using Dovecot v1.2 changeset: 9126:b745911012bb
ACL config:
acl = vfile
# To let users LIST mailboxes shared by other users, Dovecot needs a
# shared mailbox dictionary. For example:
acl_shared_dict = file:/var/cache/dovecot/shared
Rainer Sigl schrieb:
> Hi List,
> on my mailserver (exim4, dovecot 1.0.0, postgresql, ubuntu dapper, about
> 500 users) I record an enourmous amount of disc writes (up to 18000
> blocks written each second) in the time where most of users are active.
> This IO activity causes wait-states on the dis
Hi List,
on my mailserver (exim4, dovecot 1.0.0, postgresql, ubuntu dapper, about
500 users) I record an enourmous amount of disc writes (up to 18000
blocks written each second) in the time where most of users are active.
This IO activity causes wait-states on the disc interface (RAID5) and
fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
using Dovecot v1.2 changeset: 9126:b745911012bb
This line in dovecot.conf make trouble (wrapped in mail):
mail_executable =
/usr/local/dovecot-1.2.rc5unpatched/libexec/dovecot/rawlog
/usr/local/dovecot-1.2.rc5unpatched/libexec/dovecot/imap
42 matches
Mail list logo
