On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:09 -0400, Eric Sammons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been through google and the dovecot source and have not yet found
> a reasonable explanation for the 'Timeout while waiting for lock' error.
> My customer's configuration is utilizes mbox with the following mbox
> configs.
>
Hi,
So I've been through google and the dovecot source and have not yet found
a reasonable explanation for the 'Timeout while waiting for lock' error.
My customer's configuration is utilizes mbox with the following mbox
configs.
[snip]
pop3_lock_session = yes
mbox_read_locks = fcntl
mbox_write_l
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:54 +0200, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > Timo (and all others), what do you think about such a Postfix
> > policy server implemented as a part of Dovecot?
>
> Dovecot v2.0 makes this much easier, since it can be extended with any
> kind of external services
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:54 +0200, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> Timo (and all others), what do you think about such a Postfix
> policy server implemented as a part of Dovecot?
Dovecot v2.0 makes this much easier, since it can be extended with any
kind of external services without recompiling anything.
Hi guys,
I'm currently experimenting with Postfix, Dovecot and OpenLDAP
to setup a mail server hosting virtual users.
The standard stuff works fine so far.
The only thing that doesn't work as I'd like it to do is Quota.
Currently, Dovecot handles/enforces quota through the deliver LDA.
When Postf
On Jun 12, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Geoffroy Desvernay wrote:
For a single webmail connection par login, it work, thanks to
cache_key
using client's IP.
But for multiple use of the same login in the webmail, there are more
than one 'password' valid at a time…
What may be the 'correct' solution:
T
On Jun 12, 2009, at 7:09 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
You only need to move one mail into the mailbox so that the mailbox
gets added to the database. Once that mail gets expunged, all the
other old existing mails get expunged along with it.
!? This isn't what you said when this was discussed earl
Hi,
First, thanks Timo and Stefan for this great IMAP/Sieve implementation...
We are using 1.1.16+cmu_sieve/managesieve additions for now (following
releases since ~ 1.0.1).
We have a specific problem here with auth-cache:
We use direct imap/sieve connection from different clients, using LDAP
pas
On 6/11/2009 6:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
it doesn't do anything (especially not deleting e-mails).
Obviously, in stef/Trash and stef/Spam, there are e-mails
waiting to be deleted.
>>> It doesn't go by the email date, it goes by the date/time the
>>> email was moved into that fold
I can confirm that now emails fetched from gmail are not market as
read, cool thanks!
I think I misunderstood the parameter the first time I've read it.
I don't know if that "pop3_no_flag_updates" is a standard name for the
param, but I would have changed to:
pop3_flag_updates = yes // means it up
10 matches
Mail list logo
