Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Oh, yes, that's it! When I wrote the code I noticed that the line looked
> a bit short. I thought it might have been because it was missing '.' at
> the end that all other commands had, but it must have been the lack of
> OK that kept nagging my subconsciousness. :)
>
> Fix
Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org
>> [mailto:dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org]
>> Namens James Butler
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2009 20:58
>> Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
>> Onderw
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:05 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
> Note the answer to the login request. I think dovecot 2.0 always missed
> the starting "OK ...". Maybe this is the problem?
Oh, yes, that's it! When I wrote the code I noticed that the line looked
a bit short. I thought it might have been because
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:29 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>
>> The effect on Outlook/OE is that it keeps asking for the password...
>>
>
> Hmh. What about with the attached patch? I guess it then at least logs
> in, but does it use IDLE?
>
>
unfortunately the patch doesn
On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:31 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:20 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
2 uid fetch somevaliduid 5 uid fetch 4 (BODYSTRUCTURE
BODY.PEEK[])
5 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTUR
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:29 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
> The effect on Outlook/OE is that it keeps asking for the password...
Hmh. What about with the attached patch? I guess it then at least logs
in, but does it use IDLE?
diff -r 36311318a958 src/imap/main.c
--- a/src/imap/main.c Mon Jun 01 14:37:18
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:31 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:20 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> > 2 uid fetch somevaliduid 5 uid fetch 4 (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
> > > 5 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE
>
> This should fix it: http://hg.dov
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:20 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> 2 uid fetch somevaliduid 5 uid fetch 4 (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
> > 5 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE
This should fix it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/4d2b2adfd415
signature.asc
Description
> So it saw the CAPABILITY response, but apparently not the tagged OK
> response, and then it timed out and tried again later? But two things:
>
> 1) The post-login CAPABILITY reply is wrong. Did you set imap_capability
> setting manually? Remove it.
>
> 2) Did Dovecot really not send OK reply or
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:59 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:03 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
This command fails:
2 uid fetch somevaliduid 5 uid fetch 4 (BODYSTRUCTURE BO
Timo Sirainen pisze:
OK, then I think you'll just have to end up patching that small part of
Dovecot. Supporting NIL separator seems like more trouble than worth.
Maybe you can also do something similar to how Maildir++ works, just
decide that e.g. ^ character is a hierarchy separator and have
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 13:09 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 6/1/2009 12:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> Were the messages moved there before expire plugin was loaded? Those
> >>> aren't tracked.
>
> >> Is there a simple way to fix this? Ie, maybe a script that could be run
> >> the first time
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:59 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:03 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> >> This command fails:
> >> 2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
> >> 2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unk
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:03 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
This command fails:
2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUC
On 6/1/2009 12:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Were the messages moved there before expire plugin was loaded? Those
>>> aren't tracked.
>> Is there a simple way to fix this? Ie, maybe a script that could be run
>> the first time a folder is added to the list, to add all of the current
>> messages
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:43 +0200, e-frog wrote:
Thanks Timo! It works now as long as there is no namespace for the virtual
plugin defined:
>>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6fd725b94504
>>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/531083e6e84a
>> The above
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:03 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
This command fails:
2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/f1a6c9dd4c
At 1:13 PM +0200 4/2/07, Frank Doege wrote:
>/thanks steffen, this will work for me till we have a plugin :-)/
What do you see as the benefit of a Dovecot plugin over a
free-standing sending gadget?
Also, Dovecot could advertise an ad-hoc IMAP capacity, which could be
understood
on 5-30-2009 2:25 PM Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk spake the following:
> On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> # e2fsck -D -f /dev/hdXY
>>
>> Note: This should work with both ext2 and ext3 filesystems. Depending
>> on the
>> size of your filesystem, this could take a long time. Perhaps you
>
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:43 +0200, Olivier Cailloux wrote:
> Since the change for dovecot, however, things are going strange.
> Sometimes the labels disappear for some reasons. Sometimes they stay
> there. And I can't reproduce the behavior, it just seems random. This is
> very annoying as it to
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 06:33 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/31/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> > Were the messages moved there before expire plugin was loaded? Those
> > aren't tracked.
>
> Is there a simple way to fix this? Ie, maybe a script that could be run
> the first time a fo
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:40 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
> 0.074466 10.4.1.100 -> 10.4.1.171 IMAP Request: ydqb LOGIN
> "i...@.com" "mypassword"
> 0.085791 10.4.1.171 -> 10.4.1.100 IMAP Response: * CAPABILITY
> IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE AUTH=PLAIN
> AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=D
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:43 +0200, e-frog wrote:
> >> Thanks Timo! It works now as long as there is no namespace for the virtual
> >> plugin defined:
> >
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6fd725b94504
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/531083e6e84a
>
> The above doesn't seem to fi
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:03 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> This command fails:
> 2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
> 2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/f1a6c9dd4c33 ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 21:23 +0200, e-frog wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 12:49 +0100, e-frog wrote:
Trying 1.2.beta1 with expire plugin currently:
When I set mail_location = maildir:~/.maildir the expire plugin doesn't
delete messages
ChangeLog contains somewhat more exact entries. But I don't think many
people care about the exact reason. For example the last 3 could have
been instead (their hg commit messages):
- Maildir: Use i_stream_stat() instead of i_stream_get_fd()+fstat().
Fixes zlib plugin.
- Maildir: Make sur
This command fails:
2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[])
2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE
Thanks,
Jonathan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi
Sorry if this a FAQ, but this updates report looks rather vague. The
four statements all say that "in case of xxx, yyy /could/ happen".
Wouldn't it be better to document what the actual bug in in the old
version, as in "buffer overflow at xxx" etc?
roy
On 1. juni. 2009, at 07.50, Timo
Dear Dovecot list,
I recently switched from uw-imapd to dovecot to manage my huge mbox
files (about 1 GB). I now observe a very strange behavior, difficult to
reproduce reliably, which might be related to some misunderstanding on
my part on how either dovecot works or imap labeling works.
Wh
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Implemented it now to v2.0:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5f64f935e64b
>
> You could test this by first verifying with older Dovecot or another
> IMAP server that Outlook/OE/etc. actually uses some IMAP extension, such
> as IDLE. Use e.g. Dovecot's rawlog or some
On 5/29/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
Hmm. Stephan, you currently have sieve_subaddress_sep setting. Should we
instead use a common setting here? Like:
protocol lda {
recipient_delimiter = +
}
>>> With v1.2 it probably wouldn't do anything,
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:24 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>
>>> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/0b3225f7b3a6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> hmm, partly. It show up as expected now, but I cannot subscribe to
>> subfolders of subfolder of INBOX.
>>
>
>
On 5/31/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> Were the messages moved there before expire plugin was loaded? Those
> aren't tracked.
Is there a simple way to fix this? Ie, maybe a script that could be run
the first time a folder is added to the list, to add all of the current
messages as of t
Am 28.05.2009 um 09:36 schrieb Sven Eulberg:
Hello,
sometimes we get the following errors on out dovecot proxies:
dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection
queue full (no auth attempts): REMOTE= LOCAL= TLS handshaking
dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login: Disc
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org
> [mailto:dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org]
> Namens James Butler
> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2009 20:58
> Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
> Onderwerp: [Dovecot] For the record:
> Postfix
On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:40 AM, Lenthir wrote:
Our storage has two parts... MySQL database and files with mails.
Very complicated, and I can't talk about it...
Do you mean you've implemented your own storage backend to Dovecot?
Yep, we implemented storage backend to Dovecot. Now Dovecot is
compa
Timo Sirainen pisze:
Alternatively you can unset "Server supports folders that contain
sub-folders and messages" setting in Thunderbird.
It's impossible, we can't change anything on the client side. The
configuration must be the simpliest as it can be...
Our storage has two parts... MySQL data
37 matches
Mail list logo
