http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.16.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.16.tar.gz.sig
Fixes a couple of bugs in v1.1.15's changes. Hopefully the last v1.1
release before v1.2.0.
- v1.1.15 could have crashed if mailbox-closing command was pipelined
after
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 13:03 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I have folders containing messages which have been moved there -- either
> by the sieve plugin or manually in Thunderbird -- days or even weeks ago.
> The messages are not removed even with an expire time of "somefolder 1".
Were the messag
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 21:23 +0200, e-frog wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 12:49 +0100, e-frog wrote:
> >> Trying 1.2.beta1 with expire plugin currently:
> >> When I set mail_location = maildir:~/.maildir the expire plugin doesn't
> >> delete messages.
> >
> > Should be fix
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:02 +0800, wallace0615 wrote:
> I compared the data that using the two way to send, and found the reason:
> use outlook and foxmail: at the beginning of the eamil data is "From
> zxjteacher_SP_LZU ";
> and if I telnet host 25 to send the mail: at the beginning of the eamil
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 17:15 -0500, Matt Rude wrote:
> When I run the plug-in with the test flag, I receive the following message:
> /usr/local/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext
> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool --test
> Info: a...@example.com/Trash: stop, expire time in future: 1242953758
>
> Al
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:35 +0200, Andre Hübner wrote:
> > Does the problem go away if you don't configure Dovecot with
> > --enable-devel-checks?
>
> no, its not included in my configure-line. This is it:
..
> --enable-debug
This is what I meant actually, the name just changed in v1.2.
What do
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 02:11 -0400, David S. Madole wrote:
> Panic: imap: user=x, Status: file maildir-mail.c: line 85
> (maildir_mail_stat): assertion failed: (fd != -1)
Thanks, this fixes it:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/140bd7523890
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 17:26 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > Anyway it's not an error. It just means that all the rest of the
> > mailboxes have future timestamps, and expire-tool has finished its work.
>
> I upgraded to Dovecot 1.1.15, but expire still gives me trouble.
Did you try looking for the folders by connecting to IMAP using command line.
telnet servername 143
a1 login username pass
a2 list "" *
Check if you could see anything.
Did you try looking for the folders by connecting to IMAP using command line.
telnet servername 143
a1 login username pass
a2 list "" *
Check if you could see anything.
Hi,
That's what I'm looking for at the moment.
Thanks,
Eoin
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+ekennedy=sherlings@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+ekennedy=sherlings@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Scott
Silva
Sent: 29 May 2009 23:13
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Do
yes in deed.
then it worth a note or a link on the "download" page of dovecot ;-)
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Joan schreef:
thanks Stefan for the reply.
Yes, I have problems, as the "gratefully stolen copy" in Sieve is not
synchronized with the Dovecot one, so the current "new Sieve" (0.15)
does n
On 31. mai. 2009, at 06.00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
[...]
AFAIK an "updatedb" (as in locate/slocate) [...]
This won't help with
Joan schreef:
thanks Stefan for the reply.
Yes, I have problems, as the "gratefully stolen copy" in Sieve is not
synchronized with the Dovecot one, so the current "new Sieve" (0.15)
does not compile anymore with the current Mercurial/Hg of Dovecot.
That is why I was raising those 2 points.
I
> Many MUAs tag SPAM themselves and move SPAM to a junk folder (Thunderbird
> uses "Junk").
>
> It is said to not automatically train these mails, but let have an human
> revise them.
I really think you should turn that off. When it eventually does
classify email, you will run into problems be
thanks Stefan for the reply.
Yes, I have problems, as the "gratefully stolen copy" in Sieve is not
synchronized with the Dovecot one, so the current "new Sieve" (0.15)
does not compile anymore with the current Mercurial/Hg of Dovecot.
That is why I was raising those 2 points.
Stephan Bosch
Joan wrote:
As the "new Sieve implementation" is using a "gratefully stolen copy of
deliver.c from dovecot" (i.e. a dirty code in mail-raw.c), would it be
possible for the Sieve piece
1 - to be using files from dovecot directly rather than
copying&changing it (which is very bad for mainten
Hi,
As the "new Sieve implementation" is using a "gratefully stolen copy of
deliver.c from dovecot" (i.e. a dirty code in mail-raw.c), would it be
possible for the Sieve piece
1 - to be using files from dovecot directly rather than
copying&changing it (which is very bad for maintenance)
18 matches
Mail list logo
