On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
Scott Silva wrote, On 4/17/09 1:27 PM:
[...]
AFAIR the RFC's state that all e-mail addresses are acted on in
lowercase when
being manipulated. The upper case parts are left intact only for
human beings
to read.
That is very wrong. Email addres
Scott Silva wrote, On 4/17/09 1:27 PM:
[...]
AFAIR the RFC's state that all e-mail addresses are acted on in lowercase when
being manipulated. The upper case parts are left intact only for human beings
to read.
That is very wrong. Email address local-parts MUST be treated as
case-sensitive in
On Apr 17, 2009, at 6:51 PM, stefan novak wrote:
maybe you have mounted your nfs share with nodiratime?
Dovecot doesn't care about atimes in mailbox syncing, only mtimes.
On Apr 17, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Markus Werner wrote:
Or you could also see if you could create a private namespace with
prefix="#User/" and subscriptions=yes, perhaps with
location=maildir:/var/lib/dovecot/empty:CONTROL=~/Maildir/shared
where
the empty directory would be a world-readable non-wri
maybe you need to include vacation?
require "vacation";
if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
stop;
}
> Is there an alternative to the "redirect" Sieve capability?
>
> For example:
>
> if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> stop;
> }
>
> How can I do the above without using "
Is there an alternative to the "redirect" Sieve capability?
For example:
if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
stop;
}
How can I do the above without using "redirect"?
Unfortuna
maybe you have mounted your nfs share with nodiratime?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:43:01PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It would be possible to do both. The INBOX/ could be set up as a hidden
> namespace and the "" namespace would be the default one. Or is there a
> reason why you wouldn't want "" namespace to show up anything?
Crying users, because s
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 23:38 +0200, Markus Werner wrote:
> > Preferably you should also be using subscriptions=no so you wouldn't
> > have to specify CONTROL at all, but for that you'd need to have a
> > namespace with prefix="".
>
> Would an additional namespace, for subscriptions only, work? I wo
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:22:32PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:48 +0200, Markus Werner wrote:
> > namespace shared {
> > separator = /
> > prefix = "#User/%%u/"
> > location =
> > maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/index/shared/%%u:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:48 +0200, Markus Werner wrote:
> namespace shared {
> separator = /
> prefix = "#User/%%u/"
> location =
> maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/index/shared/%%u:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/shared
> subscriptions = yes
> list = yes
> }
The CONTROL must hav
On 4/17/2009 1:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:05 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have come across my more problem. If somebody sends mail to JEFF
instead of jeff it is saying user unknown. How do I tell the pipe
command in Postfix to lowercase the username but not the e
Hi,
I've got a problem with user shared folders and subscriptions. When I try to
subscribe a folder, dovecot returns "OK Subscribe completed", but the newly
subscribed folder is not listed with LSUB:
a1 login t...@example.com ***
a1 OK [CAP.
a2 list "" "*"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:05 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> I have come across my more problem. If somebody sends mail to JEFF
> instead of jeff it is saying user unknown. How do I tell the pipe
> command in Postfix to lowercase the username but not the extension?
You can also do this in Dovecot
On 4/17/2009 12:39 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/17/2009 8:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly
with Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am
going to change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command to
mailbox_transport
On 4/17/2009, noahisaac (n...@miller.cc) wrote:
I've got Dovecot version 1.0.7
Best bet is to upgrade... lits of fixes and improvements since this
version...
1.1.14 is current stable version, and is available (well, maybe not
quite yet since it was only released yesterday, but at least 1.1.13
On 4/17/2009 8:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly
with Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am going
to change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command to mailbox_transport.
I have a few questions to make sure I am t
Wolfram Schlich writes:
Hi Wolfram,
> I am looking for a tool that does a true two-way synchronization
> (synchronization of expunges/deletes) of IMAP mailboxes, kind of
> a mixture of unison and imapsync.
> Does anyone have any ideas how to accomplish that?
I use OfflineIMAP [1] to sync my 2 r
James Butler wrote:
> Postfix 2.5.5
> SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (under Perl 5.10.0)
> ClamAV 0.95.1
> Dovecot 1.2.rc2
>
> works fine on Fedora 10.
>
> Installed Dovecot and ClamAV from source and everything else using yum.
>
> I'm using the ClamAV plugin for Spamassassin:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spam
On 4/17/2009, noahisaac (n...@miller.cc) wrote:
> I've got Dovecot version 1.0.7
Best bet is to upgrade... lits of fixes and improvements since this
version...
1.1.14 is current stable version, and is available (well, maybe not
quite yet since it was only released yesterday, but at least 1.1.13 i
Postfix 2.5.5
SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (under Perl 5.10.0)
ClamAV 0.95.1
Dovecot 1.2.rc2
works fine on Fedora 10.
Installed Dovecot and ClamAV from source and everything else using yum.
I'm using the ClamAV plugin for Spamassassin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
I'm calling Spamass
i run dovecot 1.1.7 and i have the ldap.conf like this:
base = ou=DOMAIN-Users,dc=domain,dc=com
ldap_version = 3
auth_bind = yes
dn = cn=ldap,cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=com
dnpass = password
I am authenticating against AD2003 and have not have and issue since
it went live back in december... I woul
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:01 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> > But there's no dovecot.deliver anymore in v1.2:
>> >
>> > ~/cvs/dovecot-1.2/src/deliver% grep dovecot.deliver deliver
>> > ~/cvs/dovecot-1.2/src/deliver%
>> >
>> > It is in v1.1 though.
>> >
>>
>> I have no answer for you, except:
>>
>>
Hi -
I've got Dovecot version 1.0.7 running on a CentOS 5.2 machine. It's
serving pop, imap and imaps and authenticating against an Active Directory
machine. This all works fine at first, but after about two weeks or so,
dovecot's authentication against AD starts to fail. All of dovecot's
aut
on 4-16-2009 6:10 PM Jeff Grossman spake the following:
> On 4/16/2009 5:18 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> On 4/16/2009 2:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:14 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Everything I can find about setting this up applies to virtual users
which
I
On 4/17/2009 9:24 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:10 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
You'll probably want to use userdb static now. Or if deliver needs to
verify that the user exists, use something like:
userdb passwd {
args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/home/vmail/user/
}
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:10 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> > You'll probably want to use userdb static now. Or if deliver needs to
> > verify that the user exists, use something like:
> >
> > userdb passwd {
> > args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/home/vmail/user/
> > }
> >
> I don't know if deliver
On 4/17/2009 8:46 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2. Have all mail delivered for each user to the "/home/vmail//"
directory. All mail will be owned by vmail, but that is okay
since Dovecot is the only thing touching the mail files anyway.
.
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2. Have all mail delivered for each user to the "/home/vmail//"
directory. All mail will be owned by vmail, but that is okay
since Dovecot is the only thing touching the mail files anyway.
..
6. Copy the current users mail to the ne
On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Raphael Thoma wrote:
We are currently facing the problem, that dovecot doesn't return any
messages (Pop3: +OK 0 messages) even if there are messages in the
cur and new directory (maildir format). The logfile does not contain
any information other than login/logo
On Apr 17, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Jernej Porenta wrote:
If I set my namespaces like this:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix =
inbox = yes
location = mbox:~/:INBOX=~/.mailbox
hidden = yes
list = yes
}
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = mail/
location = mbox:~/mail
prefix = ma
Thank you. I like that suggestion. I will probably do that.
Any recommendation on moving the mail over from the old location to the
new location without messing up any of the date/time stamps on the
messages? I use maildir format.
On 4/17/2009 8:41 AM, Romer Ventura wrote:
Looks about righ
Looks about right... I have a very similar setup, but i authenticate
to Active Directory via LDAP and it works very good.
If you have or may get more domains i would set up mail_location to
something like this: /home/vmail/%d/%u that way you are ready for
growth and everything is kept organ
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly with
Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am going to
change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command to mailbox_transport. I
have a few questions to make sure I am thinking correctly. All of my
users are sys
Hello
We are currently facing the problem, that dovecot doesn't return any
messages (Pop3: +OK 0 messages) even if there are messages in the cur
and new directory (maildir format). The logfile does not contain any
information other than login/logout.
After I deleted the dovecot.index file, a
On Sex, 2009-04-17 at 22:03 +1000, Simon L Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a mail server with multiple instances of Postfix each listening
> on a different IP address to create a set of virtual mail servers. There
> are various reasons why separate instances of Postfix seems to work best
> to
Hi,
I am looking for a tool that does a true two-way synchronization
(synchronization of expunges/deletes) of IMAP mailboxes, kind of
a mixture of unison and imapsync.
Does anyone have any ideas how to accomplish that?
TIA.
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschl
Hi,
We have a mail server with multiple instances of Postfix each listening
on a different IP address to create a set of virtual mail servers. There
are various reasons why separate instances of Postfix seems to work best
to achieve this goal, but I wont divert into that discussion here.
I w
Hello,
I am trying to migrate existing UW-IMAP installation to dovecot 1.1.14
and I am having troubles with namespaces.
As you know UW-IMAP allows full system access to home directory of a
user and you can set up dovecot to do that as well, but I would like to
use namespaces.
If I set my n
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 18:09, denis wrote:
> Hi,
> But the problem is that dovecot creates (when you log in for the first time)
> a directory in the form of the exact address. Here for example,
> /var/alternc/mail/d/de...@collectifs.net
>
> And so all connections will be on an empty location.
I was already going to report a bug with rc2 where the server crashed
when a client tried to access a Maildir folder with wrong permissions.
After installation of rc3 the server correctly reports the wrong
permissions and keeps running:
IMAP(user1): stat(/var/spool/mail/user1/Maildir/tmp) fail
Thank you for all tips. The design look more clear to me now.
I have one more question. I looked into fts_build_want_index_part() and I
saw that I need to add some flags to message_part_flags, what values should
I choose? My first approach was to follow your schema and set
MESSAGE_PART_FLAG_ATTACH
Hi,
I use dovecot 1.0.15 on Debian Lenny.
In my /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf, i use user_query = SELECT path, 33 AS uid,
uid AS gid FROM mail_users WHERE alias = '%u'
The result is something like this /var/alternc/mail/d/denis_collectifs.net and
is the correct location (the Maildir is created
User reports: 0% of 640MB -- which cannot be true.
I logged in as masteruser and was able to confirm this. I'm getting
"0.0% von 640.0MB" == "0.0% of 640.0MB"
His maildirsize file is attached. His mailbox is nearly full.
Manual login:
# telnet localhost 143
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to loca
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.14.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.14.tar.gz.sig
>
>
Here's a short status table when testing 1.1.14 on a Sun Fire X4240
(AMD, Solaris 10 Update 6 x86):
Compiler Options
On Apr 17, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Mart Pirita wrote:
So it's my mistake, but I was taught, that Dovecot always give error
on startup, if any double config lines exist.
Unfortunately not. I'll see if I can add that check to v1.3/v2.0.
Tere.
If you had changed the mechanisms=plain default, it would have shown
up here (and you can see that also with dovecot -a). So something's
wrong in that setting.
Hmm, You are right, postfix install inserted into config lines:
# Postfix - suggested configuration taken from SASL_README
48 matches
Mail list logo
