On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:04 -0400, David Halik wrote:
> But just to be sure I moved my homedir to local disk temporarily, and
> you are totally right. The problem happened again! So now I'm stumped.
> It looks like it is neither NFS or INDEX, but an issue with Solaris as
> you suggested. It just
On 3/20/2009 3:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now
>> that you are maybe settled in in your new digs...
> What's your use case? People mailing 10 MB pdfs to every...@company.com,
> or just reducing disk usage because random people
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:13 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now
> that you are maybe settled in in your new digs...
What's your use case? People mailing 10 MB pdfs to every...@company.com,
or just reducing disk usage because random
Hey Timo,
I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now
that you are maybe settled in in your new digs...
Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers
priorities?
Its real high on mine, so if has been back-burnered, I'll need to start
looking f
OK, so it isn't really the kind of bug I first thought it would be.
Instead it's allocating/leaking way too much memory.
I agree. I watched it closer again this time and it filled up all
available memory within 30 seconds.
Can you test what exactly is the difference? INDEX=MEMORY or bein
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:10 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> > If you removed spam messages and purged trash via IMAP you wouldn't have
> > to worry about updating quota.
> >
>
> I mean if you do this directly on the server using a "croned" script.
Yes, but I meant that you could rewrite your
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 13:57 -0400, David Halik wrote:
> Also, I've been keeping an eye on top while this was running and it
> seems that Dovecot is growing at an amazing rate, which is why it runs
> out of room I guess:
>
> 8081 dhalik 1 580 1030M 871M run 0:33 53.29% imap
OK,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 18:47 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Yes. It's too much work for Dovecot to try to figure out all the
> different things you might be doing under it. You can anyway easily make
> Dovecot recalculate the quota: delete the user's quota usage row fr
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 15:25 -0400, David Halik wrote:
So far
everything is working smoothly, but when someone does a search through
directory with a large number of emails, dovecot dies and prints the
following message:
[ID 107833 mail.crit] Panic: Trying to allocate
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 18:47 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> > Yes. It's too much work for Dovecot to try to figure out all the
> > different things you might be doing under it. You can anyway easily make
> > Dovecot recalculate the quota: delete the user's quota usage row from
> > the database.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:43 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
For example I copy some mailboxes to my server, then the current quota
for this mailboxes is still zero.
Is it correct that dovecot can't do this for me?
Yes. It's too much work for Dovecot to try to figure o
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:43 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> For example I copy some mailboxes to my server, then the current quota
> for this mailboxes is still zero.
>
> Is it correct that dovecot can't do this for me?
Yes. It's too much work for Dovecot to try to figure out all the
differ
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 13:23 +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
> If an incoming mail is saved in 2 mail locations via dovecot deliver,
> and its wished that if deleted from box "a" should also be deleted from
> box "b" ...
>
> wil it be safe to delete based upon the W=x part of the file name
On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Looks like ESORT is broken (just compiled 1.2 from hg 10 minutes
ago). Here is the command I'm using and the corresponding error
message:
C: 5 UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT) (ARRIVAL) US-ASCII UNSEEN
S: 5 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: I
Looks like ESORT is broken (just compiled 1.2 from hg 10 minutes ago).
Here is the command I'm using and the corresponding error message:
C: 5 UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT) (ARRIVAL) US-ASCII UNSEEN
S: 5 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Invalid sort argument.
The corresponding UID SORT command (w
Harry Lachanas escreveu:
> If an incoming mail is saved in 2 mail locations via dovecot deliver,
> and its wished that if deleted from box "a" should also be deleted from
> box "b" ...
>
> wil it be safe to delete based upon the W=x part of the file name
>
> So far my tests indicate that
If an incoming mail is saved in 2 mail locations via dovecot deliver,
and its wished that if deleted from box "a" should also be deleted from
box "b" ...
wil it be safe to delete based upon the W=x part of the file name
So far my tests indicate that It could be true ...
Thanks
Harry
On 3/19/2009, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
> The current attacks against my server are very slow attacks from a
> distributed botnet and fail2ban is hardly touching them. I see
> dozens of IPs trying at no more than one per minute and it would
> appear they swap between smtp and pop ports (I
Hello,
I use Dovecot 1.1.11 and store the current quota usage in a Database.
As far I can see it, the quota usage is updated each time dovecot
performs an action on a mail.
For example if a new mail is stored in the inbox, the current quota
usage is increased. If a mail is deleted the quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's the "dovecot" process that has trouble with the fd limits, because
it needs one fd for each child process (for logging).
Dunno if it is related or helpful, I use v1.10 still. When I had
login_max_pro
20 matches
Mail list logo
