-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
I think ACL changes should take immediate effect, or at least should be
re-checked in reasonable intervals (which imo shouldn't exceed a few
seconds).
Although I see the problem in your scenario, it is rathe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, maximatt wrote:
some users report me some issues about when they try to conecct to dovecot.
they come early and when want to connect to theirs account, receive a
message from mua (ms-outlook) sayind "the pop server not responds i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:27:54PM -0200, maximatt wrote:
> hi,
[...]
> dovecot: Feb 06 20:45:55 Info: IMAP(user1): trash plugin: Added 'Sent
> Messages' with priority 3
> dovecot: Feb 06 20:45:55 Info: IMAP(user1): maildir:
> data=/var/vmail/mydomai
Hello,
I have a standard Mailman/Pipermail install with mboxes at
MM_HOME/archives/public/listname.mbox/listname.box
What's the best way to export these via IMAP using Dovecot 1.0rc15 on
Debian etch?
I know I could make a namespace with MM_HOME/archives/public/ but that
would result in half of
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:42 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> > With dbox yes, you can just ignore the error. Maildir probably would
> > give user-visible errors.
> >
> >
> Why the difference? I can see a big deal for mbox - but why Maildir?
It's just because of how the code was written. In mai
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 08:59 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should help:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/71b7c7f8d7a2
1st question...hmm...wow. Is that a patch you just wrote?! Cool!
Hmm...since I'm running
> > I think I don't need this anymore but it would be useful.
>
> It works, for imap and pop3 daemon processes. I don't see
> any in your grep.
It does, I was looking at the wrong thing. Thanks.
Mark
Words by Mark Hedges [Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:08:25PM -0800]:
>
> How is verbose_proctitle supposed to work? I set it in the
> config but I don't see anything particularly verbose while
> the mailbox is connected. This is while the connection is
> open, immediately after deleting a message, befo
How is verbose_proctitle supposed to work? I set it in the
config but I don't see anything particularly verbose while
the mailbox is connected. This is while the connection is
open, immediately after deleting a message, before closing
the connection. Same for IMAP and POP tests.
# `ps axu | gr
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> If you set mbox_read_locks=dotlock, it should get created
> whenever Dovecot is reading the mbox file. But it's
> created ONLY during those times. For example opening a
> mailbox whose index files are up-to-date doesn't cause
> dotlock to be created. A
The patch fixes everything.
Thanks!
Alan Ferrency
pair Networks, Inc.
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:51 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Is this going into the 1.1 branch for a future release, curiously?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And do I still need the p
Andrés Yacopino wrote:
> I am trying to compile Dovecot Sieve, when i execute the command make i
> get this error:
>
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- start-group
This flag is useless when libraries are offered in the correct order. I
thought I removed all of these, but apparently I didn't.
Th
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:51 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Is this going into the 1.1 branch for a future release, curiously?
Yes.
> And do I still need the previous patch(es) you sent? I expect not.
Probably not.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thanks!
Is this going into the 1.1 branch for a future release, curiously?
And do I still need the previous patch(es) you sent? I expect not.
Alan Ferrency
pair Networks, Inc.
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:35 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> > Mar 3 12:55:2
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:35 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> Mar 3 12:55:26 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(): file istream.c:
> line 81 (i_stream_read): assertion failed: (_stream->skip !=
> _stream->pos)
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/6aaf6a306c94
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
Hi *,
and yet another ACL problem. ;-)
User A allows User B to access his mailbox foobar:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready.
l login userA secret
l OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT
THRE
On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 05.03.2009, 12:21 Uhr, schrieb Edgar Fuß :
Dovecot assumes it's the only one changing the cur/ directory
Does this mean "there's no program that's not dovecot accesssing
cur" or "there's no other process than this dovecot accessing cur"?
hi,
some users report me some issues about when they try to conecct to dovecot.
they come early and when want to connect to theirs account, receive a
message from mua (ms-outlook) sayind "the pop server not responds in
60 seconds, Do you want to wait other 60 seconds for a server
response?"... lat
hi,
some users report me some issues about when they try to conecct to dovecot.
they come early and when want to connect to theirs account, receive a
message from mua (ms-outlook) sayind "the pop server not responds in
60 seconds, Do you want to wait other 60 seconds for a server
response?"... lat
I am trying to compile Dovecot Sieve, when i execute the command make i
get this error:
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- start-group
The configure sentence was :
./configure --with-dovecot=/export/software/dovecot1.2/dovecot-1.2
And it finishes right.
I have succesfully compile dovecot 1.2
Am 05.03.2009, 12:21 Uhr, schrieb Edgar Fuß :
Dovecot assumes it's the only one changing the cur/ directory
Does this mean "there's no program that's not dovecot accesssing cur" or
"there's no other process than this dovecot accessing cur"?
I.e., what about two dovecots on two servers with Ma
> Dovecot assumes it's the only one changing the cur/ directory
Does this mean "there's no program that's not dovecot accesssing cur" or
"there's no other process than this dovecot accessing cur"?
I.e., what about two dovecots on two servers with Maildirs on NFS?
Le Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:30:45 -0500
Timo Sirainen écrit:
> http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/maildir-dirty-syncs.diff
>
> This patch adds a new maildir_very_dirty_syncs setting. If set to "yes",
> Dovecot assumes it's the only one changing the cur/ directory (so other
> MDAs can add mails to new/ wi
23 matches
Mail list logo
