Hi,
I am running dovecot 1.1.10 and 1.1.11 on Solaris 10, mailboxes are in
mbox format and served by Solaris 10 NFSv3, the dovecot cache is on
local disk.
Some of my users always had above nfs error and their mailbox usually
very big, over 100M, 400M, or even 800M.
Grandy
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 16:26 -0600, Thomas M Goerger wrote:
> I'd been planning to change the source to redirect some of these errors
> from Error to Warn, as that's what it looked like it would take. I just
> wasn't exactly sure what to be looking for. If I have to change the
> source, that's fin
I'd been planning to change the source to redirect some of these errors
from Error to Warn, as that's what it looked like it would take. I just
wasn't exactly sure what to be looking for. If I have to change the
source, that's fine. Unless the change would be too extensive to make it
worthwhile,
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 15:14 -0600, Thomas M Goerger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to change the log levels of a few of the errors that Dovecot
> throws. Our servers throw errors at the console above the 'Error' level,
> and there are a few that I'd like to change to 'Warn' so that they don't
> do so.
Hi,
I'd like to change the log levels of a few of the errors that Dovecot
throws. Our servers throw errors at the console above the 'Error' level,
and there are a few that I'd like to change to 'Warn' so that they don't
do so.
Has anyone out there attempted this and can give me a few pointers?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:19 -0600, Bryan Bradsby wrote:
>
>>> I also hate the "aggregator" and "writer" names
>>>
>> Master, slave (ala DNS) ?
>>
>
> Maybe, but a bit weird in a multi-master setup.
>
>
Could always go with the naming conventions used by mult
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:19 -0600, Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> > I also hate the "aggregator" and "writer" names
>
> Master, slave (ala DNS) ?
Maybe, but a bit weird in a multi-master setup.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> I also hate the "aggregator" and "writer" names
Master, slave (ala DNS) ?
Bryan Bradsby
Texas State Government Network
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 19:24 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> > I'd think it behaves the same way if you simply created the private
> > namespace? The public namespace creation shouldn't make a difference.
>
> I'd think so too, but it doesn't work that way : if I set up only one private
> namespace
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 07:24:47PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> I cannot create a mailbox named "foo.bar" as I could with a global
> configuration with no namespace at all.
Would you agree that the behavior which denies dot is the correct one ?
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
| Pôl
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:36:48AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > But if I create a public Namespace, then I have to create a private
> > default
> > namespace as well and the server doesn't behave the same way :
>
> I'd think it behaves the same way if you simply created the private
> names
On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Florian Wörter wrote:
dovecot: Feb 16 09:08:09 Fatal: chdir(/home/woefl81) failed with uid
1001:
Permission denied
Do you have SELinux or something similar installed?
On Feb 16, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Thomas Hummel wrote:
But if I create a public Namespace, then I have to create a private
default
namespace as well and the server doesn't behave the same way :
I'd think it behaves the same way if you simply created the private
namespace? The public namespace
Hello Timo,
I'm experiencing the following different behaviors with dovecot-1.1.8/Maildir.
My Maildir hierarchy separator is the "." (dot) character.
My namespaces, when I use them, separator is "/".
When I run the server without any namespaces, I can create mailboxes named
something like
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Guenther Falk wrote:
> My dovecot-ldap.conf is:
> auth_bind = yes
> auth_bind_userdn = uid=%u,ou=People,dc=mydomain,dc=com
> [...]
> default_pass_scheme = CRYPT
> [...]
> It seems dovecot ignores the CRYPT password scheme. The password seems
> to be encrypt
Hi,
I read a lot of howto's and I got problems with LDAP and Dovecot to work
together.
I'm using:
Gentoo Linux 2008.0 hardened
Dovecot 1.1.7
Kernel 2.6.26
OpenLDAP 2.3.43
My dovecot-ldap.conf is:
uris = ldaps://auth.mydomain.com:636
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%u,ou=People,dc=mydomain
Hi,
I read a lot of howto's and I got problems with LDAP and Dovecot to work
together.
I'm using:
Gentoo Linux 2008.0 hardened
Dovecot 1.1.7
Kernel 2.6.26
OpenLDAP 2.3.43
My dovecot-ldap.conf is:
uris = ldaps://auth.mydomain.com:636
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%u,ou=People,dc=mydomain
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 00:24 +0100, Alex wrote:
Your debug output was from imap, but you're crossing the quota from
deliver. What does deliver log with mail_debug=yes when crossing the
quota?
this from dovocot-deliver.log with mail_debug=yes:
And that was all the output f
Hello!
I'm having a problem with dovecot on my gentoo linux box. it would be great
if you could help me.
i'm planing to use dovecot as imap server. the incoming mails for the
different useres are fetched by getmail. for every user a script should be
called, which fetches the e-mails of this user f
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:30:14AM +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:02:19AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Perhaps the NFS cache flushing doesn't work then for some reason. What
> > OS (kernel) are you using on the Dovecot servers? How big values have
> > you set to attribute
20 matches
Mail list logo
