On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 15:30 +0300, Andrey Panin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> this patch allows master process to drop more root priveleges under
> Solaris. My limited testing shows that code works, but I'm not sure
> that defined privilege set is permissive enough for dovecot.
>
> Unfortunately I have
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:42 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In our configuration, we are using a "passdb passwd-file", with
> "user=" directives in each username, and a separate "userdb
> passwd-file" which contains the target usernames for the "user="
> directives. This works fine, for
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 00:10 +0100, Marcin Rzepecki wrote:
> Hello,
> i have following problems using dovecot-antispam plugin (Dovecot >1.1.3,
> FreeBSD 8.0-Current, dovecot-antispam 1.0/1.1)
> dovecot-antispam compiled using dspam-exec/mailtrain, with/wo debugging
> (i've tried all possibilities)
>
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:06 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> >> Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
> >>> When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
> >>>
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 12:16 +0100, Bardur Haskor wrote:
> HiWe need to track exactly when our users read messages.
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to figure out how we can achieve
> this with Dovecot. Then I saw the mail_log plugin.Is it possible to
> extend the plugin to also log system flag
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
login_log_format_elements from dovecot.conf was honored. Now when
I ru
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:15 +0100, Laurent Blume wrote:
> Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> > I can't really think of why this would have happened. You wouldn't
> > happen to have a core dump available from this? That would be very
> > helpful in figuring out why this happened.
>
> I have, here are the ps
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
> > When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
> > login_log_format_elements from dovecot.conf was honored. Now when I run
> > /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login from /e
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 02:44 +0300, Zohan wrote:
> Dec 9 02:11:15 localhost dovecot: auth(default): ldap(user1,127.0.0.1): pass
> search: base=ou=People,dc=example,dc=com scope=subtree
> filter=(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=user1)) fields=uid,nopassword
Do you have a "nopassword" field in LD
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 17:43 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Hi
>
> For some application we need a master user on our IMAP servers. We use
> dovecot 1.1.7 in proxy mode, with proxy_maybe (some mailboxes are on the
> proxy itself, others are on remote servers, also running dovecot).
>
> But the prox
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 04:41 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Oh. You haven't run configure at this point, so it's using config.h
> that's distributed in the dovecot tarball and reflects my machine's
> configuration. That won't work. I'm surprised it worked even this well.
> I wonder why the config.h i
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:41 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Hm. I update ports and try it again:
>
> mx# cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
> mx# make clean
> ===> Cleaning for dovecot-1.1.7_1
> mx# make extract
> ===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway
> ===> Found saved con
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:26 -0600, Jon Harvie wrote:
> Is it possible to use the dovecot 1.1 expire plugin with postgresql and
> if so how?
I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire
Note that the expires table also changed there.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 09:33 +0100, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il Tuesday 02 December 2008 18:14:23 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 15:35 +0100, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> > > passdb:
> > > driver: checkpassword
> > > args: /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
..
> userdb static {
> arg
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:40 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> Somewhere between revision f5554ae61732 (12 days ago) and the release
> of 1.2a4 (f53952ac4285; 9 days ago) sorting appears to have broken.
I fixed it yesterday.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 16:17 +0200, Ivars Strazdiņš wrote:
> Hi there,
> are there more trash plugin related updates since v1.1.4 ?
> I'm trying to use the plugin with dovecot+mysql according to
> documentation and get frequent segfaults
>
> Dec 4 13:58:21 mail kernel: [1605631.688946] imap[16662
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I'm using maildrop to filter mail like:
xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"
xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep"
I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?
deliver can't execute external progr
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:55 +0100, Matthias Rieber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I compressed a folder with the following script:
>
> ...
> for i in *.*.*; do
> file $i | grep bzip2 >/dev/null 2>&1
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> echo "Compress: $i"
> cat "$i" | b
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm using maildrop to filter mail like:
>
> xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"
> xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep"
>
> I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?
deliver can't execute external programs. Typically you'd
Здравствуйте, Yarema.
>> The annoying problem with that is that this will happen with ALL
>> plugins, not just with autocreate plugin. So it's kind of in the wrong
>> wiki page. But people probably won't find it elsewhere.. I'd rather see
>> about getting this fixed in FreeBSD port.
> I just di
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Has anyone reported this over on LKML yet? Or filed a bug?
I did not yet. First I would like to test my self compiled dovecot
without inotify against 2.6.27. Second I do not know where and how to
report kernel issues. (Also I am a little bit afraid of the whole kern
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yarema, do you have any thoughts on this?
>
> On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:54 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>>> I'd rather say this is a bug in the FreeBSD ports. If you compiled
>>> Dovecot directly from sources you wouldn't have had this problem.
>> Well may be. But:
> ..
>>
I'm using maildrop to filter mail like:
xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"
xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep"
I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?
Your argument is bogus - see above... again, a basic, properly
configured firewall has negligible impact on pretty much any systems
resources, even ancient ones...
So, yeah, enabling a firewall on a mail server is essentially free,
whether talking impact on system resources, or dollar cost.
Wh
Wow. Yeah, *some*thing's changed recently to cause this. If I had to
guess, I'd say it's a recent Thunderbird upgrade that's triggering it, as
it's been 2-3 weeks since my last dovecot upgrade.
Some other interesting data points:
* This problem seems to happen when I use Thunderbird (both
On Dec 13, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security
is handled by equipment built and optimized
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> I did several mbox fixes today. Wonder if they could have fixed also
> some of these other mbox bugs you've reported?
I'm stress-testing current 1.1.x mercurial head with imaptest and with
my account.
So far everything seems fine.
It sou
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Sat, December 13, 2008 12:28 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:40 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
In recent days, dovecot's "imap" processes keep getting stuck. Each
time I check my server (running dovecot 1.1.7) there's a bunch of
"imap" processes (som
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
> My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
> security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
> stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security
> is handled by equipment built
My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security is
handled by equipment built and optimized for that job.
It's not like it costs anything
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
Are you sure it's because of a missing return path? Sounds more like the
message MIME body is broken. I've never checked if it is..
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:19 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for
> bad_MIME
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:1
The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for bad_MIME
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Pretty much the same thing, just replace "rejection" with "vacation" in
> my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
>
> On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100,
Pretty much the same thing, just replace "rejection" with "vacation" in
my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return
> path
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 16:45 +0100, Diego Liziero wrote:
> Sorry, this time I've no core file, (I forgot to set ulimit -c
> unlimited before starting dovecot)
I did several mbox fixes today. Wonder if they could have fixed also
some of these other mbox bugs you've reported?
signature.asc
Descrip
I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return path
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> > I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
> > been fixed in v1.1.x?
>
> I
Sorry, this time I've no core file, (I forgot to set ulimit -c
unlimited before starting dovecot)
Regards,
Diego.
---
dovecot: Dec 09 08:26:52 Panic: IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c:
line 590 (mbox_sync_rewrite): assertion failed:
(mails[idx].from_offset == start_offset)
dovecot: Dec 09 08:26
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
>> Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
>>
>> Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
> He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have a
> firewall between the mail server and the jun
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Wow. Yeah, *some*thing's changed recently to cause this. If I had to
guess, I'd say it's a recent Thunderbird upgrade that's triggering it, as
it's been 2-3 weeks since my last dovecot upgrade.
Some other interesting data points:
* This problem seems to happen when
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:17 +0100, Diederick van Dijk wrote:
> > It doesn't show anything until there are shared mailboxes. Are there
> > any?
> >
> >
> How do I setup these, symlinks ? Or is it in the acl ?
What do you need shared mailboxes for? Perhaps you don't really need
user-shared mailbo
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 09:23 -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On Sat, December 13, 2008 5:43 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
> > also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
> > problem. Might be worth asking
On Sat, December 13, 2008 5:43 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
> also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
> problem. Might be worth asking about in Linux kernel mailing list.
Has anyone reported this over on
On Sat, December 13, 2008 9:14 am, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Wow. Yeah, *some*thing's changed recently to cause this. If I had to
> guess, I'd say it's a recent Thunderbird upgrade that's triggering it, as
> it's been 2-3 weeks since my last dovecot upgrade.
Or perhaps it's a recent kernel up
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 12:56 +0100, Diederick van Dijk wrote:
namespace:
type: shared
separator: /
prefix: Shared/%%u/
location: maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u
list: yes
subscriptions: yes
Looks ok.
auth default:
passdb:
driver
On Sat, December 13, 2008 12:28 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:40 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
>> In recent days, dovecot's "imap" processes keep getting stuck. Each
>> time I check my server (running dovecot 1.1.7) there's a bunch of
>> "imap" processes (sometimes 2 of them,
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
>> and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
>
> Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
>
> Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
>
He said "
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
> and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
> Hoards of little prepubescent miscreants won't stop hammering on my
> pop3 port and it's driving me bananas.
Although I'm not necessarily arguing against such a feature being
integrated directly into dovecot, you can fix you're problem n
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:49 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> While researching a possible bug in our custom-made Maildir++ expiration
> script, I found the following in src/plugins/quota/quota-maildir.c.
>
> | static const char *
> | maildir_list_next(struct maildir_list_context *ctx, time_t *mtime_r)
Cor Bosman wrote:
It seemed to be NFS related in our case.
Is your Maildir directory mounted via NFS?
I am using NFS-mounts, but not in connection with dovecot.
Greetings,
Arno
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:14 +0100, Antonio Casado Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi all, I have seen this in log:
>
> dovecot: Dec 03 06:12:57 Error: IMAP(maurirrr): file
> mail-index-view-sync.c: line 666 (mail_index_view_sync_end): asser
> tion failed: (view->log_file_offset >= view->map->hdr.log_file_int_
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
> been fixed in v1.1.x?
I don't consider it a bug. Rejection messages shouldn't have a return
path, otherwise they themselves may be rejected and soon you'll have a
> The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
> also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
> problem. Might be worth asking about in Linux kernel mailing list.
We've had something similar happen on 2.6.24. Over time processes would
take more and mo
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 12:56 +0100, Diederick van Dijk wrote:
> namespace:
> type: shared
> separator: /
> prefix: Shared/%%u/
> location: maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u
> list: yes
> subscriptions: yes
Looks ok.
> auth default:
> passdb:
> driver: pam
> userdb:
Hello, Timo.
> Yarema, do you have any thoughts on this?
> On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:54 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>> > I'd rather say this is a bug in the FreeBSD ports. If you compiled
>> > Dovecot directly from sources you wouldn't have had this problem.
>>
>> Well may be. But:
> ..
>> wor
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:48 -0800, badeguruji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can i fine tune dovecot for less then 10 users? or is there no need?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning lists some tuning settings.
But the defaults should work fine with small installations.
> Also, is there any smtp c
Yarema, do you have any thoughts on this?
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:54 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> > I'd rather say this is a bug in the FreeBSD ports. If you compiled
> > Dovecot directly from sources you wouldn't have had this problem.
>
> Well may be. But:
..
> work/dovecot-1.1.7/config.h:
Hello, Timo.
> On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:08 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>> Heh - I solve it.
>> To make it compile in FreeBSD you need to:
>>
>> cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
>> make extract
>> mkdir work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys
>> locate sysmacros.h
>> cp /your/path/to/sysmacros.h work/dovecot-1.1.*/s
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:33 +0100, Arno Wald wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> >> Or does it make more sense to try another kernel first?
> >
> > I guess that could also help.
>
> I started testing this with another kernel (2.6.26-6.slh.1-sidux-686).
> Until now (the last 15 hours) no such fail
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Or does it make more sense to try another kernel first?
I guess that could also help.
I started testing this with another kernel (2.6.26-6.slh.1-sidux-686).
Until now (the last 15 hours) no such failing imap process did show up.
So I guess it happens with 2.6.27 kerne
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:08 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Heh - I solve it.
> To make it compile in FreeBSD you need to:
>
> cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
> make extract
> mkdir work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys
> locate sysmacros.h
> cp /your/path/to/sysmacros.h work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys/
> patch it as sayd a
Heh - I solve it.
To make it compile in FreeBSD you need to:
cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
make extract
mkdir work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys
locate sysmacros.h
cp /your/path/to/sysmacros.h work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys/
patch it as sayd at wiki.
And then all work well.
I update wiki now.
> Hello all.
> I try t
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
> Dovecot 1.1.7 is running so smoothly that I gave up checking its log
> files daily. :)
>
> I've just had a look, and among the usual
> "IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox Sent UID xx got too little data: xx vs xx"
> messages (that means that un
Good news, everyone!
The most annoying bug in v1.1 series should finally be fixed by these
patches:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/f28348c5201e
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/74c47fcfb420
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/a28520d26b5a
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/539f8d
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la "route add
"?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
Understood. I sorta like this idea. I will give i
* Dave McGuire :
>> You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
>
> By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la "route add "?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de
Postfix -
67 matches
Mail list logo
